Submissions to the 2012 Review of the National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme - Lyndall McCormack

The Discussion Paper: Review of the National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS)–June 2012 was released on 1 June 2012. Submissions were received betweeen 1 June and 27 July 2012. The comments received from this consultation process will be used to inform the government of stakeholder views.

Page last updated: 12 October 2012

PDF printable version of Ms Lyndall McCormak (PDF 54 KB)

Please read the article below

Please add this information to my submission can you compare and contrast what is being done here so that if it means less environmental impacts you take up this new position implore the people at Environment to take up this new position if it has lesser impacts to the environment.

Yours sincererly
Ms Lyndall McCormack

Solid Waste & Recycling
DAILY NEWS May 28, 2012 2:18 PM

EPA considers new pharmaceutical waste rules

As reported by the U.S.-based Waste Business Journal (Waste Business Journal), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is now considering healthcare facility-specific regulations for managing hazardous pharmaceutical waste rather than regulate them under its universal waste program as proposed in December 2008.

The action follows criticism from states and the healthcare industry that EPA's original approach would fail to address improper disposal of the waste.

EPA's 2008 proposed rule aimed to facilitate better management of pharmaceutical wastes by streamlining generator requirements and encouraging generators of hazardous pharmaceutical wastes to manage them under the provisions of the Universal Waste Rule, which is generally less stringent than federal rules for hazardous waste.

The proposed rule was intended to facilitate take-back programs by removing Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA) barriers, according to the rule's preamble.

The Environmental Council of the States, representing state environmental regulators, wrote that EPA's proposed rule was unlikely to divert pharmaceuticals from sewer systems because of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's (DEA's) witnessed destruction requirements and because reverse distributors cannot accept most pharmaceutical wastes generated outside the pharmacy.

States want the agency to take a more holistic approach to dealing with pharmaceutical waste by working with other federal agencies, like the DEA and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), on the issue.

This submission is made by me an individual a member of the Revesby Workers club a member of the Padstow R.S.L a member of the Alternative technology association the moderator of the zerowastenetwork yahoo group parishioner of the Anglican Church Padstow I do this submission as an individual. I want you to note that children neonates till 12 years of age are significantly affected by toxins. I gained this knowledge from my reading.Return to top

  1. Please look at this information and ban DMF (dimethyl fumarate). Please read these articles
  2. Take note of this
  3. I am just making you aware of this
  4. Take note of what they do in California
  5. I want to make you aware of this
  6. You might ask the EU what products where banned and compare and contrast
  7. Can you eliminate toxins from cleaning products please read these articles
  8. I want to make you aware of this a waste issue
  9. Please don't make consumers polluters look at this web link

Return to top

A full list of all 2012 submissions can be viewed at June 2012 submissions to the review of NICNAS.