Australians in the affected community and their healthcare providers and supporters believe this illness is chronic Lyme disease or something similar. However, the concept of chronic Lyme disease is disputed and not accepted by most conventional medical practitioners, not only in Australia but around the world. The likelihood that Australia has an indigenous form of classical Lyme disease is questionable given a causative microorganism with a competent vector is yet to be found. Whether a form of tick-borne human borreliosis exists in Australia is yet to be determined.
The Australian Government recognises the existence of classical Lyme disease which is found in high rates in endemic areas (mainly the north east of the USA, some areas of Europe including the UK and some parts of Asia). Australians can be infected in these endemic areas and bring the infection to Australia. In the same way, visitors infected in endemic areas can also bring the infection to Australia. Because there is no person-to-person transmission of classical Lyme disease, the risk to Australia and Australians is low. The diagnosis and treatment for classical Lyme disease is readily available in Australia.
At the same time, the department is aware that Australian ticks are important vectors of human disease, e.g., rickettsial infections, Q fever and the newly described mammalian meat allergy.
The department will continue to encourage, identify and make known relevant Australian research on tick-borne disease.
Even though the Chief Medical Officer’s Clinical Advisory Committee on Lyme Disease (CACLD) has ceased, the Australian Government Department of Health will maintain an interest in an Australian Lyme disease-like syndrome. This website will provide updates on the department’s work and relevant research findings on Australian Lyme disease-like syndrome.
Statement from Australia’s Chief Medical Officer
Ministerial Statement - Australian Government response to the Senate Community Affairs References Committee final report: Inquiry into the growing evidence of an emerging tick-borne disease that causes a Lyme-like illness for many Australian patients
Australian Government response to the Senate Community Affairs References Committee final report: Inquiry into the growing evidence of an emerging tick-borne disease that causes a Lyme-like illness for many Australian patients
The Australian Senate has established an inquiry into a Lyme-like illness in Australia. The URL link for making a submission is: (www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/Lyme-like_Illness).
Australian Government Response to the Senate – Community Affairs References Committee Interim Report on Health Inquiry into Lyme-like illness
Department of Health Media Statement
The Department of Health issued a media statement on Lyme Disease in Australia following several requests from the public and media outlets - a copy can be accessed below:
Recently Published Australian Research
- Molecular characterization of ‘Candidatus Borrelia tachyglossi’ (family Spirochaetaceae) in echidna ticks, Bothriocroton concolor Authors: Siew-May Loh, Amber Gillett, Una Ryan, Peter Irwin, Charlotte Oskam – April 2017. *
- Searching for Lyme borreliosis in Australia: results of a canine sentinel study Peter Irwin et al 13 March 2017. *
- Inhibition of the endosymbiont "Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii" during 16S rRNA gene profiling reveals potential pathogens in Ixodes ticks from Australia. Peter Irwin et al, 25 June 2015. *
- Bacterial Profiling Reveals Novel “Ca.Neoehrlichia”, Ehrlichia, and Anaplasma Species in Australian Human-Biting Ticks” Peter Irwin et al 28 December 2015 *
- Novel Borrelia species detected in echidna ticks, Bothriocroton concolor, in Australia Peter Irwin et al 14 June 2016. *
Preventing and Treating Tick Bites
Chief Medical Officer's progress report on Lyme disease in Australia
Australian guideline on the diagnosis of overseas acquired Lyme Disease/Borreliosis
Progress Report against the CACLD Terms of Reference
The Progress Report from the Chief Medical Officer that details the activity achieved against each of the CACLD’s terms of reference can be accessed below.
The Department of Health contracted an expert in microbiology to conduct a Scoping Study to identify the research needs for an investigation into whether a causative tick borne microorganism for Lyme disease exists in Australia.
The Scoping Study can be accessed below.
Department of Health’s Response to the Scoping Study
In November 2013, the Department of Health sought public comment on the Scoping Study requesting that comments focus on the research programmes. Twenty-four submissions were received, along with eight expressions of support for the Lyme Disease Association of Australia’s submission and four letters from people describing their personal situations (36 submissions in total). The department considered each submission and has prepared a response to the Scoping Study.
The Department of Health’s response to the Scoping Study can be accessed below:
Consolidated List of Research Projects
The Department of Health, in consultation with the CACLD and other clinical experts has identified a number of research projects that would assist in clarifying the Australian Lyme disease-like syndrome.
The consolidated list of research projects can be assessed below:
Lyme Disease Treatment Round Table
The Department of Health hosted the Lyme Disease Treatment Round Table Meeting on Tuesday 27 May 2014. The outcomes can be accessed below:
Advice provided by the CACLD, recommendations from the Scoping Study, and outcomes from the Lyme Disease Round Table Meeting have revealed potential research projects that would assist in clarifying the Australian Lyme disease-like syndrome.
The majority of Australian Government health and medical research funding is administered by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). The Australian Research Council (ARC) has funded some Special Research Initiatives in the health and medical areas however the ARC does not generally fund medical research. The ARC Medical Research Policy is available on the ARC web site. Researchers may also seek other avenues for funding including the higher education sector, business sector or the private non-profit sector. The Department of Health is not a research funding agency.
National Health and Medical Research Council
The Project Grant scheme is the NHMRC's main avenue of support for individuals and small teams of researchers undertaking biomedical, clinical, public health or health services research in Australian universities, medical schools, hospitals or other research institutions. The Project Grants scheme aims to fund research leading to improved health of all Australians. To achieve this aim the scheme provides support for projects with the following attributes:
- Investigator initiated research across all fields of research, from basic research through to research in clinical and community settings, relevant to health; and
- single investigators or small teams of researchers (up to 10 investigators) and early career researchers (new investigators).
All applications undergo a competitive peer-review process and project grant rounds usually start in December each year. Further information is available on the NHMRC website.
Australian Research Council
The ARC funds research and researchers under the National Competitive Grants Program (NCGP). As part of its commitment to nurturing the creative abilities and skills of Australia's most promising researchers, the NCGP provides:
- support for the highest-quality research leading to the discovery of new ideas and the advancement of knowledge
- financial assistance towards facilities and equipment that researchers need to be internationally competitive
- support for the training and skills development of the next generation of researchers
- incentives for Australia’s most talented researchers to work in partnership with leading researchers throughout the national innovation system and internationally, and to form alliances with Australian industry
Advice to Clinicians
The provision of linked information does not constitute departmental endorsement.