An evaluation of the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Demonstration

6.11 Summary table of responses for overall opinion of the Pad Demonstration

Page last updated: August 2008

Table 3: Overall opinion of the Pad Demonstration

Q39/Q78. Now, I would like to find out your overall opinion of the PAD Demonstration Project, do you agree or disagree, or neither agree nor disagree that:

Statement

Manager (53)

Staff (59)

Strongly agree/ agree %

Strongly disagree/ disagree %

Strongly agree/ agree %

Strongly disagree/ disagree %

Having an AED in the organisation is important to me
100
0
95
2
My organisation is a suitable location for AED placement
98
2
98
2
Having an AED in the organisation is important for public safety
96
0
98
2
I am committed to the PAD project
96
2
98
2
AED is easy to use
92
0
100
0
I would not hesitate to use the AED
91
6
97
3
Having an AED in the organisation is important for employee safety
89
2
95
3
Any untrained staff or member of the public could use an AED
79
14
78
19
Training is easy to understand
89
0
-
-
Reasonable maintenance cost
83
2
-
-
Reasonable on-going training costs
62
6
-
-
I am pleased to be a responder for the AED
-
-
97
3
Management support my role as a 'first responder'
-
-
96
2
Clear procedures and plan of action are in place if there is an emergency
-
-
86
7
My knowledge is kept up-to-date with internal training as required
-
-
68
19
I had to take on additional work over and above what was expected
-
-
10
85