Health Star Rating (HSR) Advisory Committee Meeting - Outcomes of meeting held on 17 February 2015
- Four submissions regarding potential anomalies with the HSR Calculator were considered, as well as other correspondence regarding the HSR system.
- Members agreed to post a register of anomaly submissions that have been considered by the Advisory Committee.
- Members noted that a proposal to amend Standard 1.2.7 – Nutrition, Health and Related Claims (the Standard) of the Australia and New Zealand Food Standards Code (the Code) was being developed to remove the requirement for food manufacturers to comply with specific requirements in the Standard that would be imposed if they chose to display the prescribed nutrient icons within the HSR graphic.
- Members agreed on a Dispute Resolution Process, should complaints be received about the HSR system. The process will be made available on the HSR website.
- Members noted that the HSR website would be further developed to include, for example, a ‘What’s New’ page that may feature information such as details of upcoming stakeholder workshops, and notification of amendments to the HSR Style Guide and Guide for Industry to the HSR Calculator.
- Members noted that the request for tender to develop the monitoring and evaluation framework for the HSR system has been released, and will close on 11 March 2015.
Steering Committee Meeting – 21 November 2014Steering Committee members noted updates from: the Chair of the Health Star Rating (HSR) Advisory Committee on progress in implementing the HSR system; and the Chair of the Social Marketing Advisory Group on the development of the social marketing campaign to support implementation of the HSR system.
The Steering Committee noted the decision taken by the Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation (Forum) at its 27 June 2014 meeting to extend the implementation timeframe for the HSR system to five years, commencing 27 June 2014, with a review of progress after two years.
The Steering Committee noted an update on the progress in implementing the HSR system in New Zealand.
Members were advised that 11 companies have either adopted the HSR system, or publicly announced their intention to adopt the system, and that there are approximately 100 products displaying the HSR system graphic on shelf.
Products which currently display the HSR system graphic include cereals, muesli bars, ultra high temperature processed milks, salads, cooked rice, canned tomatoes, ready meals, cheese, meat pies, peanut butter and chicken wings.
Health Star Rating (HSR) Advisory Committee Meeting – Outcomes of meeting held on 31 October 2014Key Outcomes
- Significant progress was made in scoping the monitoring and evaluation framework. It was agreed that relevant expert/s would be commissioned to assist with finalising the framework and sourcing appropriate data.
- Two submissions regarding potential anomalies with the HSR calculator were considered, as well as other correspondence regarding the HSR system.
- Members agreed on the approach for a dispute resolution process, should complaints be received about the HSR system.
- A representative from The George Institute for Global Health attended part of the meeting to discuss the role it could potentially play in enhancing adoption of the HSR system.
- Members noted that the three recent workshops held with food companies and other stakeholders in Sydney (26 August 2014), Melbourne (19 September 2014) and Perth (22 October 2014) were well attended, including representation from small to medium enterprises. Participants were provided with information about development of the HSR system, how the HSR calculator operates and an overview of the intended social marketing approach, with the opportunity to ask questions throughout. A summary of questions and answers from all three workshops is currently being prepared. Top of page
Health Star Rating (HSR) Advisory Committee Meeting – Outcomes of meeting held on 26 August 2014
- Members noted an update from the Chair of the SMAG on the development of the social marketing campaign for the HSR system, and considered the content of a digital approach for a ‘soft launch’.
- Members agreed on a Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for the HSR system, and will continue its development at the next meeting.
- Members noted that additional stakeholder workshops are scheduled for 26 August 2014 in Sydney; 19 September 2014 in Melbourne; and mid-October 2014 in Perth (date later confirmed as 17 October 2014). The stakeholder workshops are intended to provide guidance on how to apply the HSR system; an overview of the social marketing campaign; an update on other work that is underway; and to gain feedback from stakeholders regarding current understanding of the system and what support is required going forward.
- Members assessed the first anomaly submissions against the process endorsed by the Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation at its meeting on 27 June 2014. The outcomes of the Advisory Committee’s consideration of anomaly submissions will be available on the HSR website once it goes live. Top of page
Health Star Rating (HSR) Advisory Committee Meeting - Outcomes of meeting held on 15 July 2014
- New Zealand was welcomed as a Member of the HSR Advisory Committee.
- Members noted an update from the Chair of the SMAG on the development of the social marketing campaign for the HSR system.
- Members agreed to convene additional stakeholder workshops to: provide guidance on how to apply the HSR system; an overview of the social marketing campaign; an update on other work that is underway; and to gain feedback from stakeholders regarding current understanding of the system and what support is required going forward. There is one stakeholder workshop scheduled for 26 August 2014 in Sydney and one on 19 September 2014 in Melbourne.
- Members discussed the development of a Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for the HSR system.
- Members noted that the process for dealing with HSR Calculator anomalies was endorsed by the Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation at its meeting on 27 June 2014, and agreed that the process be made available on the Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council website - www.ahmac.gov.au.
- Members are working to establish a complaints process with the intention that it is in place as products appear on shelf.
- Members noted the update from the Chair in relation to recent meetings with small and medium enterprise in Western Australia, Victoria and South Australia. The Chair advised that the meetings were well attended, and constructive discussions took place. Top of page
Steering Committee Meeting - 2 May 2014Steering Committee Members considered advice from the Front-of-Pack Labelling Oversight and Advisory Committee and agreed on the definition of an anomaly, and process for addressing potential anomalies within the Health Star Rating calculator, for consideration by the Legislative and Governance Forum on Food Regulation at its meeting in June 2014. The Steering Committee also noted the final stages of design artwork, which has been well received by stakeholders, and is currently subject to consumer testing.
Health Star Rating (HSR) Advisory Committee Meeting - Outcomes of meeting held on 15 April 2014
OverviewMembers discussed the development of Interim Governance Arrangements for implementation of the HSR system, a proposed process to address any anomalies that may be identified within the HSR calculator and minor refinements to the Style Guide.
- Members discussed the proposed Interim Governance Arrangements for implementation of the HSR system and discussed options for seeking technical expertise in relation to complaints.
- Some minor amendments to the Style Guide were discussed for clarity and simplicity.
- Members discussed the process to be considered by the Front of Pack Labelling (FoPL) Steering Committee for dealing with potential HSR calculator anomalies.
- Members noted the update from the Chair in relation to the recent Adopters and Supporters meetings in Melbourne and Sydney. The Chair advised that the meetings were well attended, effective and that constructive discussions took place.
- Members considered preliminary work undertaken by the former FoPL Implementation Working Group in relation to monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the HSR system, including options for the collection of baseline data. A representative from GoScan presented to Members. Members agreed to further consider monitoring and evaluation activities as a priority at its next meeting. Top of page
Health Star Rating Advisory Committee Meeting - Outcomes of meeting held on 3 March 2014
OverviewMembers had a constructive discussion and made significant progress including consideration of the Health Star Rating (HSR) label design, and developing a process to address any anomalies that may be identified within the HSR calculator for consideration by the Legislative and Governance Forum on Food Regulation (the Forum) at its June 2014 meeting.
- Members noted that the work of the HSR Advisory Committee was to oversee and advise on the finalisation, implementation and evaluation of the HSR system, and to develop a process for dealing with anomalies for consideration by the Forum.
- Members agreed to propose to the FoPL Steering Committee a name change from the FoPL Oversight and Advisory Committee, to the HSR Advisory Committee.
- Members agreed to a number of proposed minor amendments to the Terms of Reference.
- Members noted that the preferred implementation option for the HSR system is via an industry led code of practice hosted by the Australian Food and Grocery Council (AFGC) but was exploring alternate arrangements should the AFGC be unable to assume responsibility for administration of the code in the near future.
- Members were provided with the HSR Style Guide containing draft artwork, noting that the artwork may be further refined in light of additional consultations.
- Members agreed to establish a Social Marketing Advisory Group (SMAG), comprised of representatives with social marketing expertise, to inform the approach to social marketing activities. Initial SMAG membership was agreed to from the Heart Foundation, NSW Health, a public health expert, and the Australian Government Department of Health. The AFGC, Australian Industry Group (AIG) and the Australian National Retailers Association also agreed to each put forward a nomination.
- Members considered a process that could be used to address any anomalies that may be identified within the HSR Calculator. The Front-of-Pack Labelling Secretariat was asked to further develop the concepts discussed, for consideration at the next meeting of the HSR Advisory Committee.
- Members considered preliminary work undertaken by the former FoPL Implementation Working Group in relation to monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the HSR system, including options for the collection of baseline data. It was proposed that a GoScan representative be invited to the next meeting of the HSR Advisory Committee, pending initial discussions.
- Members noted the importance of operating in good faith. Minutes are to provide an overview of the general discussion, and agreed outcomes. A short communique will be posted on the FoPL webpage (hosted by the Department of Health) after each meeting. Members agreed not to disclose further detail about committee deliberations to other stakeholders or media. Top of page
Steering Committee Meeting – 14 November 2013The Front-of-Pack Labelling (FoPL) Steering Committee met on 14 November 2013 to consider feedback from the recent meetings of the FoPL Project Committee, the Technical Design Working Group and Implementation Working Group.
The FoPL Steering Committee noted the significant progress made by the FoPL Project Committee and its working groups in progressing further amendments to the Health Star Rating (HSR) and is confident that the HSR System is technically robust, and produces results which are in line with the provisions in the 2013 Australian Dietary Guidelines and Guide to Healthy Eating.
The FoPL Steering Committee will report to the Legislative Governance Forum on Food Regulation with its final recommendations.
Project Committee Meeting - 4 November 2013The Project Committee received an update on the industry feedback on the refinements to the Health Star Rating Calculator (HSRC). The Project Committee agreed that the current version of the HSRC is producing appropriate star ratings for food products in all categories that accurately reflect their nutritional profile, and accord with provisions in the 2013 Australian Dietary Guidelines and Guide to Healthy Eating.
The Project Committee agreed that companies could choose to apply the full Health Star Rating (HSR) system to non-dairy beverages, in accordance with the hierarchy of elements. It was agreed that packaged water (as defined by the Food Standards Code) would receive an automatic 5 star rating to reflect the importance of its role in hydration. The Project Committee also agreed that companies could choose to apply the full HSR system to confectionery products, in accordance with the hierarchy of elements. Top of page
Technical Design Working Group - 29 October 2013The TDWG considered feedback from stakeholders on the HSR calculator, which reinforced that the HSR calculator works reasonably well in identifying food products which may assist consumers construct healthy diets. A number of unresolved issues were referred to the FoPL Project Committee.
Implementation Working Group - 28 October 2013The Implementation Working Group (IWG) continued to flesh out an ‘implementation roadmap’ that provides an indicative timeframe for implementing the HSR system across a large number of packaged products. The IWG also further discussed: the evidence base by which the Health Star Rating (HSR) system will be evaluated over the longer term; a proposal for a social marketing program; and details around second phase consumer research that will measure the factors that drive decision making and the likely impact of the HSR system on consumer purchasing behaviour.
The IWG considered its advice to the Front-of-Pack Labelling Oversight and Advisory Committee, once it is established. Top of page
Steering Committee Meeting - 6 September 2013The Front-of-Pack Labelling (FoPL) Steering Committee (Steering Committee) is very heartened by the significant progress made by the FoPL Project Committee and its working groups following the 14 June 2013 meeting of the Legislative and Governance Forum on Food Regulation.
The Steering Committee noted the work done by the Technical Design Working Group in progressing amendments to the modified Nutrient Profiling Scoring Criterion (now known as the Health Star Rating Calculator); and to resolve technical issues specific to dairy products.
The Steering Committee is looking forward to receiving further feedback from industry and other key stakeholders, who are currently testing the further refinements to the Health Star Rating Calculator.
Project Committee Meeting - 2 September 2013The FoPL Project Committee received a further update on the refinement of the "Health Star Rating Calculator" (HSRC) that will be used to profile the nutrient composition of foods and assign a star rating. As requested by the Legislative and Governance Forum on Food Regulation, particular attention has been paid to the profiling of dairy products.
A draft Guide for Industry on the Health Star Rating Calculator has also been developed, and testing of these two documents by industry and other key stakeholders will commence shortly.
The Project Committee also considered the transition of the FoPL Governance arrangements and recommendations about certain types of food products that should not use the FoPL system. Details of these products will be included in the FoPL Style Guide, which is currently being developed by the TDWG. Top of page
Technical Design Working Group - 13 August 2013The TDWG considered an early draft version of the FoPL style guide and the most recent version of the modified Nutrient Profiling Scoring Criterion (NPSC). The TDWG, with FSANZ, is preparing a guidance document that will assist industry and other key stakeholders in their consideration and testing of the revised modified NPSC. The TDWG prepared a series of recommendations for the Project Committee to consider at its meeting of 2 September 2013 and agreed to meet again following the Project Committee meeting.
Implementation Working Group - 1 August 2013The IWG considered how it can continue to contribute to the FoPL project in the areas of consumer research; baseline data for monitoring and evaluation, and social marketing. The IWG provided input to the next phase of consumer market research; explored approaches to monitoring and evalution; and developed a plan to action the social marketing campaign.
Technical Design Working Group Meeting 12 – 8 July 2013The TDWG agreed to key elements and time frames of its work plan over the next six months including the development of the style guide. The TDWG considered amendments to the modified Nutrient Profile Scoring Criteria (NPSC) following industry feedback and received a presentation from Dairy Australia about anomalies specific to some dairy products. The TDWG agreed to undertake further refinements to the modified NPSC before circulating a revised version back to industry and other key stakeholders. The TDWG agreed to meet again in August 2013 to review progress against its work plan. Top of page
Project Committee Meeting - 26 April 2013Over the past year, the Front-of-Pack Labelling (FoPL) Project Committee has been working to develop an interpretive FoPL system for use on packaged foods sold in Australia. Participants from government, industry, consumer groups and public health groups have collaborated and negotiated to develop an agreed, mutually beneficial system that aims to assist consumers to make informed, healthier food choices.
In addition to extensive discussion among key stakeholder groups, development of the system has been informed by advice from technical experts and consumer market research.
FoPL has significant potential to support consumers to make healthier food choices by giving them at-a-glance information about the food they buy.
The Project Committee meeting on 26 April 2013 continued to finalise recommendations and draft designs for the proposed FoPL system. The Legislative and Governance Forum on Food Regulation (the Forum) will consider recommendations about the FoPL system at their meeting in June 2013.
Key recommendations include:
- The system should consist of a 5 star rating (including half star increments) and a nutrient component.
- The nutrient component will include icons for energy, saturated fat, sodium, sugars and one optional positive nutrient eg calcium.
- The star rating will be underpinned by a modified Nutrient Profiling Scoring System.
- The system will be voluntary.
- The system should be supported by comprehensive social marketing and education. Top of page
Project Committee - 4-5 April 2013The meeting continued its productive work to develop recommendations for the FoPL system, including its design, a methodology for a rating system, an implementation framework and a social marketing strategy, with a view to resolving recommendations shortly.
Project Committee - 12 March 2013The Meeting discussed the progress of the working group’s work to develop final recommendations for a FoPL system and its implementation framework. The meeting narrowed areas of disagreement and provided feedback to working group co-chairs, with a view to agreeing final recommendations at its next meeting.
Technical Design Working Group - 4 March 2013A further presentation was received from FSANZ about remodelling the NPSC for FoPL. TDWG agreed to include sugar in the informative component of FoPL, and is giving special consideration to the scaling used to generate star rating for dairy beverages.
Project Committee – 12 February 2013The meeting noted the significant progress of the working groups’ work on final recommendations for a FoPL scheme and considered interim reports on Nutrient Profiling Scoring Criteria remodelling and consumer testing.
Implementation Working Group – 5 February 2013The IWG settled the overall framework for the implementation of an agreed FoPL scheme, an implementation and review plan for the scheme. It also agreed a final package of papers for recommendations to the Project Committee and that these would be finalised at its next meeting. Top of page
Technical Design Working Group 30 January 2013The Meeting received a presentation from Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) about Nutrient Profiling Scoring Criterion remodelling for the purpose of FoPL and agreed that work should continue on this. The Meeting considered advice received from the National Health and Medical Research Council about sugar.
Technical Design Working Group - 30 November 2012The Meeting agreed refinements to the draft FoPL designs which will shortly be consumer market tested.
Project Committee Meeting 7 - 22 November 2012The Project Committee considered a range of possible FoPL designs, which will be subject to consumer testing in late 2012 and early 2013 and noted proposals for integrated FoPL approaches for confectionery and carbonated beverages, which will be considered in more detail. The Meeting noted the good progress of the work, which will see recommendations finalised and presented to Ministers in June, via the FoPL Steering Committee.
Steering Committee Meeting - 12 October 2012This meeting noted the progress reports of the Project Committee and its working groups and agreed its report to the FoFR meeting in December 2012, which includes a timetable for finalising FoPL recommendations.
Project Committee Meeting 6 – 5 October 2012The Project Committee noted the progress reports of the technical design and implementation working groups. The Project Committee prepared its own progress report to the Steering Committee for the Forum, and identified issues requiring further work by the Committee and its working groups. Top of page
Technical Design Working Group Meeting 6 – 28 September 2012The TDWG met by teleconference to finalise its report to the FoPL Project Committee, which provides an overview of work to date and identifies aspects of the proposed FoPL system that require further consideration. The TDWG is working with Food Standards Australia New Zealand on aspects of the FoPL methodology and plans to undertake some market research around possible FoPL designs shortly.
Technical Design Working Group Meeting 5 – 19 September 2012The TDWG continued its consideration of key issues including consistent measure, food categories, exclusions, essential nutrients and system methodology. The meeting agreed to seek advice from Food Standards Australia New Zealand on technical aspects of a possible FoPL methodology.
Implementation Working Group Meeting 4 – 17 September 2012The Implementation Working Group agreed its progress report to the Project Committee and considered possible governance structures for the FoPL system, including the option of a tripartite oversight body with responsibility for implementing the overall FoPL system. It also discussed data requirements for an effective social monitoring strategy and marketing and evaluation program and the need to identify existing data sources for this purpose.
Project Committee Meeting 5 – 13 September 2012The Project Committee received progress reports from the two working groups and approved presentations and information to be provided at the Stakeholder information update session on 18 September 2012. The Project Committee considered a number of key issues including: FoPL methodology: consistent measure; informative, interpretive and design elements; and consumer testing. Top of page
Steering Committee Meeting 6 – 3 September 2012The Steering Committee noted the progress of the Project Committee’s work and noted possible FoPL recommendations being developed by the Technical Design Working Group and Implementation Working Group. The meeting also received a report from New Zealand on the progress of its FoPL work.
Implementation Working Group Meeting 3 - 28 August 2012The Implementation Working Group agreed to explore whether it was possible to integrate a FoPL requirement into existing industry based code structures. Mechanisms for ensuring widespread coverage and the need for independent code administration were discussed. The working group agreed to commence work on identifying baseline information, new research and the funding required for all elements of the implementation plan and framework.
Technical Design Working Group Meeting 4 - 10 August 2012The TDWG continued consideration of FoPL mechanisms and design issues. The TDWG agreed to work with Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) to further test and validate a proposed FoPL methodology. Another key issue being considered is the use of a consistent measure for comparing products as well as the use of serve size or metric units (100g/100ml) as on-pack presentation. The TDWG continued to consider options for consumer testing at an appropriate point in the FoPL development process.
Project Committee Meeting 4 - 3 August 2012Project Committee members continued to discuss the issues surrounding the front-of-pack labelling development including the issues of consistent measure, stakeholder consultation, consumer testing of the front-of-pack labelling system, pilot testing of front-of-pack labelling, scope of priorities for what foods are covered, imported foods, and whether the system should enable comparisons to be made across or within categories. Project Committee received a presentation from the Technical Design Working Group on the possible designs and underpinning mechanisms that are under consideration. Top of page
Implementation Working Group – Meeting 2 - 27 July 2012The IWG further refined the proposed implementation options as well as the social marketing and monitoring and evaluation frameworks. The IWG considered code of practice matters including the roles and responsibilities of a code administration committee and a code owner committee, as well as the co-existence of other front-of-pack marks, logos, certification schemes and systems.
Steering Committee Meeting 5 - 6 July 2012The Steering Committee discussed issues and noted the progress of the work of the Project Committee and its Working Groups.
Project Committee Meeting 3 - 5 July 2012Project Committee members noted the issues register and the progress of the working groups. The committee agreed to invite the Technical Design Working Group to present at its next meeting on 3 August 2012 on the possible designs and underpinning mechanisms that are under consideration, and noted that some consumer testing of proposed designs would be required.
Technical Design Working Group (TDWG) Meeting 3 - 2 July 2012The working group is continuing its consideration of FoPL systems and identified a number of issues that it will take to the Project Committee for consideration. Top of page
Implementation Working Group – Meeting 1 - 5 June 2012The IWG members have been selected on the basis of their expertise and experience in the following fields and do not represent their organisations as working group members:
Jenni Mack (co-Chair) - Public Health/Consumer
Craig Sahlin (co-Chair) - Government/Food Regulation
Joelle Day - Industry
Lisa Studdert - Government/Preventive Health
Rohan Greenland - Public Health/Consumer
Roger Bektash - Industry
Jodi Dixon - Industry
Lisa Szabo - Government/Food Regulation
Simone Pettigrew - Public Health/Consumer
In light of the Project Committee’s Objectives and Principles for the front-of-pack labelling work, the IWG workshopped the following subject matter: implementation options, evaluation and monitoring, and social marketing. The IWG identified three co-regulatory options for implementation of an agreed front-of-pack labelling system. Each option is based on a code of practice. These options are being refined in a further paper for IWG discussion at its next meeting. The IWG also discussed possible frameworks for social marketing, monitoring and evaluation. Further work is being done with a view to a combined paper on these matters.
Technical Design Working Group (TDWG) Meeting 2 - 18 May 2012The TDWG considered a range of existing front-of-pack labelling systems, categorising like systems and rating them against the Design Principles as set out in the Project Committee’s Objectives and Principles for front-of-pack labelling development. The TDWG also noted the need for the system to allow for new products. Top of page
Steering Committee Meeting 4 - 15 May 2012The meeting noted the progress of the work by the Project Committee and its working groups.
Project Committee Meeting 2 - 11 May 2012Project Committee members agreed to the final Objectives and Principles for front-of-pack labelling development and terms of reference and membership for the working groups. Updates from the working groups were provided.
Steering Committee Meeting 3 - 2 May 2012Co-Chairs of the working groups provided the Steering Committee with an update of work undertaken to date, including out of session work by the Implementation Working Group on implementation options, evaluation and monitoring and social marketing for consideration at their first meeting. The Committee requested a monitoring system of cross boundary issues of committee and working groups.
Technical Design Working Group (TDWG) Meeting 1 - 20 April 2012The TDWG members have been selected on the basis of their expertise and experience in the following fields and do not represent their organisations as working group members:
Geoffrey Annison (co-Chair) - Industry
Michael Moore (co-Chair) - Public Health
Greg Gambrill - Industry
Rebecca Boustead - Industry/Nutrition
Kevin Buckett - Government/Food Regulation
Rosemary Stanton - Nutrition/Public Health
Clare Hughes - Nutrition/Public Health/Consumer
Neil Smith - Industry
At its first meeting, the TDWG began considering existing front-of-pack labelling systems in light of the Project Committee’s Objectives and Principles for the front-of-pack labelling work. Top of page