Three cases of dengue 1 virus infection from islands in the Gulf of Thailand

This article published in Communicable Diseases Intelligence Volume 22 Number 6, 11 June 1998, discusses three cases of dengue 1 acquired by Australian travellers in Thailand.

Page last updated: 11 June 1998

E Geoffrey Playford,1 Debra Phillips,2 David F M Looke,1 Michael Whitby1

Introduction | Discussion | References

Abstract

Three Australian tourists who recently travelled to islands in the Gulf of Thailand developed febrile illnesses associated with myalgias, thrombocytopenia, and atypical lymphocytosis. Dengue 1 virus was isolated from all three patients. The patients' clinical features and serological and virological investigations are presented. These cases highlight the need for awareness of dengue amongst travellers and the preventive precautions required when visiting endemic regions. After the urgent exclusion of malaria, dengue should be considered in the the differential diagnosis of febrile persons who have recently returned from endemic regions. Commun Dis Intell 1998;22:107-109.

Top of page

Introduction

Dengue fever is endemic throughout South East Asia. Over the past three years, increased dengue activity has been reported from Malaysia, where over 19,500 cases of predominantly dengue 1 and 2 were notified during 1997,1 Indonesia,2 Cambodia,3 India4 and the western Pacific.3,5-7 Although the north and central areas of Queensland, which correspond to the distribution of Aedes aegypti,8 are potentially receptive to the establishment of endemic dengue, the virus is not endemic in Queensland. Epidemics are assumed to have arisen from viraemic travellers.9 Recent outbreaks in Queensland have included an outbreak of dengue 2 in Cairns, commencing in December 1996, and resulting in 201 confirmed cases,10 and an outbreak of dengue 3, which commenced in December 1997 and has resulted in 165 confirmed cases up to 25 May 1998 (J. Hanna and S. Ritchie, personal communication). Sequencing data of the dengue 3 isolates has shown that the most likely source of the virus was Thailand (D. Phillips, unpublished data).

This report presents three cases of dengue 1 in Australian tourists who recently travelled to islands in the Gulf of Thailand, and discusses the implications of these cases for travellers to endemic areas and for dengue control in Australia.

Case 1

A 57 year old male developed a febrile illness associated with myalgias on 17 October 1997, three days after returning from Ko Chang. He had spent one week on the island and sustained numerous mosquito-bites. Over the preceding 6 months he had travelled through southern Spain and northern India without medical problems, apart from self-limited diarrhoea in India. Upon presentation to hospital on the 20 October 1997, investigations revealed mild leucopenia (total white cell count 2.3 x 109/L, neutrophil count 1.47 x 109/L). Four days later significant thrombocytopenia (platelet count 56 x 109/L) and mild atypical lymphocytosis (5% of 2.7 x 109/L) developed.

Arboviral serology was performed on serum collected on 21 October and 24 October. Flavivirus IgG was reactive by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) on both specimens. Dengue IgM by EIA was initially nonreactive, but reactive on the second specimen. Cross reactive IgM antibody to the four dengue serotypes was detected following ultra- centrifugation separation and haemagglutination inhibition assay (UC/HI) of the second specimen. Dengue 1 virus was isolated from both specimens.

Case 2

A 39 year old male developed a febrile illness associated with myalgias, bone pain, and vague generalised abdominal pain on the 17 October 1997, five days after arriving on KO Pha-ngan. He sustained numerous mosquito-bites whilst on the island. For the preceding three weeks he had trekked in the Himalayan area of Nepal without medical problems. He presented to hospital in Australia four days after the onset of symptoms. He developed marked leucopenia (total white cell count 1.4 x 109/L, neutrophil count 0.58 x 109/L) and thrombocytopenia (platelet count 51x109/L). Seven days after the onset of symptoms, his fevers and symptoms subsided, with the subsequent development of atypical lymphocytosis (10% of 2.1 x 109/L). Resolution of cytopenias occurred by day 12.

Flavivirus IgG and dengue IgM was detected from serum collected on 23 October. Specific IgM antibodies to dengue 1, but not types 2, 3, or 4, were detected by UC/HI. Dengue 1 virus was isolated from this serum.

Top of page

Case 3

A 31 year old female, the partner of Case 2 who also visited KO Pha-ngan, developed a similar febrile illness on the 22 October 1997, approximately five days after that of her partner. She noted a transient erythematous rash over the trunk. Although her fevers and other symptoms settled within five days, she presented to hospital on day 7 of the illness with a faint petechial rash over her ankles and feet. Investigations revealed mild thrombocytopenia (platelet count 81 x 109/L), and atypical lymphocytosis (10% of 4.4 x 109/L).

Flavivirus IgG was nonreactive and dengue IgM was reactive by EIA. Cross reactive IgM antibodies to all four dengue serotypes were detected by UC/HI. Dengue 1 virus was isolated from this serum.

Top of page

Discussion

These three recent cases of dengue highlight several important points.

In 1996, 43 cases of dengue were reported in Australia,11 including both imported and locally acquired dengue, while in 1997 approximately 171 cases were reported.12 However, given that the south-east Asian region, including the Gulf of Thailand islands where the three patients visited, are both popular destinations for western tourists and areas of dengue endemicity, it is surprising that dengue is not more frequently diagnosed in travellers returning to Australia.

Those visiting endemic regions should routinely be given pre-travel advice regarding dengue. This is particularly important for those travelling to south-east Asia during the late wet season, September to November, which is the peak time for dengue transmission. Emphasis should be given to the importance of avoiding both day-time active mosquitoes that transmit dengue, as well as night-time active mosquitoes that transmit malaria.

Medical officers to whom returned travellers present should be aware of dengue. In addition to malaria, typhoid, HIV, and rickettsial infections, dengue and other arboviral infections should be considered in febrile returned travellers. The incubation period of dengue fever ranges from 3-14 days, usually 5-7 days, and is typically followed by an abrupt onset of fevers, malaise, retrorbital headaches, myalgias, and bone and joint pains. Other specific symptoms include: a bitter, often metallic, taste; itchy skin or sensation of pins and needles in the skin; and vomiting and diarrhoea. The diagnosis may be suggested clinically, although at a minimum, blood films should routinely be performed to exclude malaria. A variety of haematological abnormalities may be encountered, including leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, and atypical lymphocytosis.13

Although serology is commonly used to confirm dengue infection, cross-reactive antibodies may prevent identification of the infecting serotype, as occurred in Cases 1 and 3. The definitive diagnosis of dengue infection requires either isolation of virus, or detection of viral RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in acute-phase serum specimens. These services are provided by reference laboratories.

The period of viraemia extends from shortly before until the end of the febrile stage of the illness,14 and cases in potentially receptive areas of Australia should avoid being bitten by daytime active mosquitoes, in order to prevent outbreaks of dengue.

The pathogenesis of dengue haemorrhagic fever relates to sequential infection with heterologous dengue serotypes occurring months to years apart,15 and patients, particularly children, diagnosed with dengue should be counselled regarding the potential risk of dengue haemorrhagic fever if revisiting areas of dengue endemicity.

Although it is considered unlikely that dengue will become endemic in Australia,16 large outbreaks can result from imported cases in the dengue receptive areas. Doctors should be alert to the possibility of dengue in travellers from dengue endemic areas in order to diagnose cases early. Prompt notification of suspected cases occurring in the dengue receptive areas is vital to allow rapid public health action to limit the spread of the virus.

Top of page

Author affiliations

1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Sexual Health,Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Queensland

2. WHO Collaborating Centre for Arbovirus Reference and Research, Coopers Plains, Queensland

Correspondence to: Dr E Geoffrey Playford, Department of Microbiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, New South Wales 2050

Top of page

References

1. Overseas briefs. Commun Dis Intell 1998;22:92.

2. Overseas briefs. Commun Dis Intell 1996;20:305.

3. Overseas briefs. Commun Dis Intell 1998;22:48.

4. Overseas briefs. Commun Dis Intell 1996;20:495-496.

5. Overseas briefs. Commun Dis Intell 1997;21:40.

6. Overseas briefs. Commun Dis Intell 1997;21:72.

7. Overseas briefs. Commun Dis Intell 1998;22:68.

8. Sinclair DP. The distribution of Aedes aegypti in Queensland, 1990 to 30 June 1992. Commun Dis Intell 1992;16:400-403.

9. Mackenzie JS, Lindsay MD, Coelen RJ, et al. Arboviruses causing human disease in the Australasian zoogeographic region. Arch Virol 1994;136:447-467.

10. Hanna JN, Ritchie SA, Merritt AD, et al. An outbreak of dengue type 2 in the Torres Strait with a subsequent outbreak in Cairns. (Submitted for publication).

11. Curran M, Harvey B, Crerar S, et al. Australia's notifiable diseases status, 1996. Annual report of the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Commun Dis Intell 1997;21:281-307.

12. Communicable Diseases Australia. National notifiable Diseases Surveillance System, Annual disease data. URL: http://www9.health.gov.au/cda/Source/CDA-index.cfm

13. Thisyakorn U, Nimmannitya S, Ningsanond V, Soogarun S. Atypical lymphocyte in dengue hemorrhagic fever: it's value in diagnosis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Pub Health 1984;15:32-36.

14. Benenson AS, ed. Control of communicable diseases manual. 16th ed. Washington: American Public Health Association. 1995:128-130.

15. Halstead SB, Yamarat C. Recent epidemics of hemorrhagic fever in Thailand: observations related to pathogenesis of a 'non' dengue disease. Am J Public Health 1965;55:1386-1395.

16. Mackenzie JS, Broom AK, Hall RA et al. Arboviruses in the Australian region, 1990 to 1998. Commun Dis Intell 1998;22:93-100.

This article was published in Communicable Diseases Intelligence Vol 22 No 6, 11 June 1998.

Communicable Diseases Intelligence subscriptions

Sign-up to email updates: Subscribe Now

This issue - Vol 22 No 6, June 1998