HTA Policy Framework
Efficient and effective HTA processes are crucial to supporting sustainable management in the growth of subsidised health technologies. Consistent application of evidence across Australian Government HTA processes is an important element in ensuring stakeholder confidence and certainty in how these processes are implemented and the outcomes achieved.
The Australian Government HTA agencies are the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), the Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC), the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) and the Prostheses List Advisory Committee (PLAC - formerly the Prostheses and Devices Committee). These agencies have complex and inter-dependent relationships. Each entity has discrete functions and responds to different policy needs.
The Australian Government has accepted two recommendations from the 2009 HTA Review that provide a policy framework for HTA processes for market entry and reimbursement in Australia. Recommendation 2 of the HTA Review Report provides:
"That the rigorous consideration of evidence be consistently applied across all Australian Government HTA processes to ensure sustainability of the Australian Government’s health financing arrangements."
This recommendation provides a new level of consistency and certainty for applicants wanting government funding.
Vision for a sustainable, efficient Australian Government HTA system
Goal of Australian Government HTA processes
Objectives of Australian Government HTA processes
Principles underpinning Australian Government HTA processes
The policy framework includes a vision, goal, objectives and principles which provide a systematic and consistent approach to HTA, and an explicit, high-level statement of direction for the implementation and integration of the current HTA functions to form a coherent system.
The policy framework assists with:
- promoting a shared and consistent approach across Australian Government HTA processes for market entry and for reimbursement;
- clearer delineation of roles and responsibilities of each component of the Australian Government HTA system, including the expert advisory committees and secretariats;
- improved transparency for applicants and other parties interested in the outcomes of HTA;
- encouraging a consumer and patient focus without increasing regulatory burden on applicants;
- more robust performance measurement and accountability;
- more efficient use of clinical and HTA expertise;
- reducing unnecessary or poorly designed regulation; and
- facilitating and encouraging links between HTA and broader health system goals.
Vision for a sustainable, efficient Australian Government HTA system
The vision articulates an aspiration for Australian Government HTA processes at the highest level:Australians have timely, equitable and affordable access to the cost-effective health technologies needed to manage their health.
Goal of Australian Government HTA processes
The goal articulates how, and on what basis, Australian Government HTA processes contribute to the Australian health system:The goal of Australian Government HTA processes is to maximise beneficial health outcomes to the Australian population within the overall funds available whilst being cognisant of the other important goals of the health system.
Objectives of Australian Government HTA processes
The objectives articulate the approach to informing robust decisions:That Australian Government HTA processes use the best available evidence and efficient methods to inform robust decisions about market entry and the subsidised use of health technologies. The Australian Government HTA system should also continually improve the evidence base for assessment and operate according to agreed principles.
Principles underpinning Australian Government HTA processes
Australian Government HTA processes reflect the following principles:| Principle | Description |
|---|---|
| Sustainable |
|
| Transparent, accountable and independent |
|
| Consultative and reflective of Australian community values |
|
| Administratively efficient |
|
| Flexible and fit for purpose |
|
| Informed by robust and relevant evidence |
|
Page currency, Latest update: 02 February, 2011
