|Low tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) hemp as a food||Investigate information gaps in relation to low THC hemp as food.
The project looked to address the following information gaps:
||In April 2017 Ministers considered the final report on the information gaps identified in considering the adoption of low-THC hemp seeds as a food. Ministers noted the key finding of the Consumption Report is that it is highly unlikely that consumption of food products containing the levels of THC tested would result in any positive tests on oral fluid, blood or urine. In light of these findings Ministers supported the draft standard that will allow low-THC hemp seeds to be sold as a food. The standard will take effect six months after gazettal. Ministers acknowledged that there is still a range of New Zealand and State and Territory legislation that currently prohibits the sale of low-THC hemp seeds as a food which will need to be amended.||This work was led by a FRSC working group chaired by Tasmania.|
|Evaluation of mandatory fortification||The aim of the project was to ascertain whether the policy objectives of mandatory folic acid fortification of wheat flour for bread making, and mandatory iodine fortification of bread have been met.
The policy objectives were to reduce the incidence of neural tube defects (serious birth defects) in the Australian population by increasing the folic acid intakes of women of child-bearing age, and to address the re-emergence of iodine deficiency in the general population of Australia and New Zealand.
|In April 2017 Ministers approved the Stage Three report (Final Report) of the Review.
Ministers noted that mandatory folic acid fortification of wheat flour for bread making has reduced the incidence of Neural Tube Defects in Australia, and that mandatory iodine fortification of bread has addressed the re-emergence of mild iodine deficiency in the general populations of Australia and New Zealand and has led to iodine sufficiency at the population level in both countries.
Ministers acknowledged industries’ contribution toward these important public health outcomes.
|This work was undertaken by a joint FRSC and Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council (AHMAC) working group led by Ms Elizabeth Flynn, Australian Government Department of Health.|
|Review of enforcement guideline||To update the existing document to capture the elements of best-practice guidelines developed since the finalisation of the existing document, and broaden the scope of the document such that it is a compliance and enforcement guideline.||In March 2018, FRSC endorsed the revised Strategy and appendices which have been amended to address submitter comments:
||A working group led by South Australia Health was established to progress this work.|
|Review of FRSC’s round table engagement concept||The objective of the evaluation, which was undertaken between late 2017 and early 2018, was to consider what worked, and what can be improved, in the way the Roundtables are designed and delivered. It was informed by participants’ feedback.||In May 2018, FRSC accepted the Evaluation Report and agreed to implement all of its recommendations.||The Victorian Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources led this review on behalf of FRSC.|
|Core activities to promote consistent approaches to implementation and compliance||Interpretation of, and compliance with, the Food Standards Code. Preparation of documents and communication approaches to meet industry’s needs for advice.||ISFR developed communications material that has been published as part of the new Food Regulation website.||This work was undertaken by ISFR.|
|Synthetic foods as an emerging area of interest||Prepare a report on the potential safety, nutritional and labelling issues that might need to be considered to maintain Australia’s and New Zealand’s reputation as producers of safe, high quality food.||Forum 25 November 2016.||Food Standards Australia New Zealand prepared the report.|
|Promoting the Food System||Development of collateral to support the Food Regulation System Communications Strategy that, in turn, supports the implementation of the Blueprint.||A communications collateral package that includes an editable PowerPoint slide deck has been successfully tested, and the materials made available to FRSC and ISFR members.||Dr Lisa Szabo, from the NSW Food Authority, led this work with assistance from Qld and FSANZ on behalf of FRSC.|
|Food Regulation website||Development of a user friendly website||Following extensive stakeholder engagement and feedback the Forum launched the new stand-alone website on 25 November 2016. Visit the new food regulation website – www.foodregulation.gov.au The site explains the collaborative joint Food Regulation System.||The Food Regulation Secretariat led this project.|
|Health star rating – dairy substitute beverages||Consideration of how dairy (milk) substitutes should be categorised in the HSR system and how they should be treated under the relevant standard.|
|Food medicine interface protocol review||The Food Medicine Interface (FMI) Protocol sets out the roles and responsibilities for Australian government agencies (national and state) in responding to products that present at the FMI. The review of the protocol was initially delayed to provide time for a sufficient number of products to be assessed under the protocol. A review was undertaken in February 2016 which considered key aspects of the application of the FMI Protocol.||A number of recommendations for improving and optimising the application of the FMI Protocol were identified and have been implemented.||The Australian Government Department of Health (including the TGA), NSW Food Authority, Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) and Queensland Department of Health participated in the review of the FMI Protocol.|
|Development of a context paper in relation to sugar||To develop a policy context paper in relation to sugar to support FRSC’s consideration of the FSANZ Technical Evaluation of Recommendation 12 in the Labelling Logic: Review of food labelling law and policy (Labelling Review) that amongst other things relation to sugar.||A policy context paper that investigated the current issues relating to sugars, with an emphasis on added sugars was considered by FRSC at is September 2016 meeting.||Australian Government Department of Health led this work.|
|Implementation Blueprint for New Strategic Direction||In collaboration with FRSC, develop a communication strategy to inform and align with the implementation of the FRSC Implementation Blueprint for New Strategic Direction.||In April 2016 FRSC considered the Communications Strategy and agreed integrate it with stakeholder engagement strategy as part of a phased approach to implementing the Blueprint over the next twelve months with assistance and oversight from the Strategic Planning Working Group.||This work was lead by Safe Food Production QLD|
|Investigation into Salmonella outbreak in salad products||Policy review |
The policy framework is being used to investigate salmonella outbreak in salad products and regulatory and non-regulatory measures to address farm practices in producing and processing leafy greens
|Work led by Victorian Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources|
|Development of Front of Pack Labelling||On 9 December 2011 the Forum on Food Regulation (the Forum) provided its response to Labelling Logic: Review of Food Labelling Law and Policy (2011), which included an agreement to develop a single interpretive front-of-pack labelling system (Recommendation 50).||On 27 June 2014, the Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation (the Forum) endorsed the voluntary front-of-pack labelling scheme, the Health Star Rating (HSR) system. A HSR Advisory Committee (Advisory Committee) was established to oversee the voluntary implementation of the HSR system. The HSR system website and education campaign were launched on Saturday 6 December 2014.||The Health Star Rating system was developed by the Australian, state and territory governments in collaboration with industry, public health and consumer groups.|
|Pregnancy warnings on alcohol labels - evaluation of voluntary labelling initiative||The final report on the evaluation of the uptake of the voluntary labelling initiative was provided to Food Ministers in June 2014.||In light of the results of the final report the Forum agreed to extend the existing trial on voluntary uptake of pregnancy health warnings on alcohol product labels, and to undertake a review in two years.||On 13 January 2014, the Australian Government Department of Health engaged Siggins Miller to undertake an independent evaluation of the voluntary labelling initiative.|
|Review of evidence on the effects and international regulation of caffeinated energy drinks||To undertake a review of the current evidence relating to the trends, consumption patterns and potential harmful effects associated with caffeinated energy drinks. The review also considered current national and international regulatory requirements for these products.||Evidence was gathered from a range of sources including; peer reviewed publications, non-government and government research, current legislative frameworks and relevant data sources, and the report released.|
|Review of food labelling laws and policy||The Ministerial Council on 23 October 2009 announced that former Australian Health Minister, Dr Neal Blewett AC, would head a panel that would undertake a comprehensive examination of food labelling law and policy.||On 28 January 2011 the Review Panel officially presented the Final Report – Labelling Logic – and it was publicly released on the same day.||Australian Government Department of Health led this work|
|Review of the operations of the ministerial council||On 2 May 2008, the Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council (Ministerial Council) finalised the first review of its operations and endorsed the implementation of seven recommendations.|
|Monitoring and Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Food||Food Regulation Standing Committee commissioned Food Science Australia to conduct a pilot survey of foods for bacteria resistant to antibiotics.||The pilot survey for antimicrobial (AMR) resistant bacteria in Australian food provided data that can be used to estimate the prevalence of AMR bacteria in selected foods purchased at retail outlets. Four retail foods; poultry, beef, pork and lettuce along with four target organisms; Campylobacter, Salmonella, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus constitute the nine food / bacterium combinations included in the survey.||Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing|