| Indicator 1. Incidence, prevalence and mortality rates of preventable diseases or conditions addressed in national programs | |
| Target: Reduction in the incidence, prevalence and mortality rates of diseases or conditions addressed in national programs, especially in relation to the agreed national health priority areas. (The nationally agreed health priority areas are: cardiovascular health, cancer control, diabetes, mental health, asthma, injury prevention and arthritis and musculoskeletal conditions). |
Information source/reporting frequency:
Prevalence data obtained through a range of surveys. Annual/intermittent reporting, dependent on survey timing. Mortality data obtained from:
|
| Indicator 2. Knowledge, attitudes and behaviour, in specific target populations, in relation to preventable diseases and health risks addressed through health promotion and disease prevention measures | |
| Target: Improvements in knowledge, attitudes and behaviours, in specific target populations, in relation to diseases and health risks addressed through health promotion and disease prevention campaigns, including sexual and reproductive health, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption and illicit drug use, that will promote health and prevent illness over time (2-5 years). |
Information source/reporting frequency:
|
| Indicator 3. The adoption and effective use of best practice approaches, including nationally recommended screening and immunisation policies, agreed guidelines and participation targets, across strategies | |
Target:
|
Information source/reporting frequency: Data obtained from:
|
| Indicator 4. Proportion of national population health strategies that take account of the needs of specified high need groups including regional and rural Australians, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, people of lower socioeconomic level - particularly children and young people | |
Target: Strategies take account of the needs of specified high needs groups and report information where available. |
Information source/reporting frequency: Data obtained from:
|
| Target: Quantity: Research funding provided to 9 national research centres and 1 research foundation in the areas of HIV/AIDS, men's and women's health, immunisation, alcohol and other drugs. | |
Result: Target met. |
In 2004-05, core funding of $8 million was provided to:
Core funding was also provided to:
In addition, funding was provided to the National Drug and Law Enforcement Research Fund and the Australian Institute for Health and Welfare. |
| Target: Quality: Implementation of a formal mechanism for evaluating population health interventions, oversighted by the Interdepartmental Committee for the National Public Health Program. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Priority Setting Mechanism for Prevention has continued as a tool that utilises economic analysis to inform health sector decision making. |
| Target: Quantity: Number of economic evaluations and reviews undertaken by, or on the behalf of the Department. | |
| Result: No target number specified in 2004-05. | In 2004-05, economic evaluations included:
|
| Target: Quality: Implementation of the NPHP National Public Health Information Development Plan. | |
| Result: Target met. | A range of projects were implemented in 2004-05 under the National Public Health Information Development Plan including a best practice assessment of methods for small area data analysis and a review of Indigenous identification in communicable diseases data. In addition, the development of a National Chronic Disease Surveillance Strategy is near completion. |
| Target: Quantity: Between 400 and 600 completions per annum of public health awards across all universities funded under the Public Health Education and Research Program (PHERP). | |
| Result: Target met. | Preliminary analysis indicates 2004 student completions will be 761. |
| Target: Quality: Implementation of a quality outcomes program for the PHERP. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Department continued to implement the quality outcomes program for the PHERP. This target was met as all universities funded under PHERP in 2004-05 participated in the quality outcomes program. This enabled the Department to monitor the quality outcomes of PHERP through universities submitting annual reports, analysing student and employment surveys conducting case studies on the impact of PHERP and initiating a National Indigenous Public Health Curriculum Audit. |
| Target: Quality: Scheduled review of PHERP to commence during 2004. | |
| Result: Target met. | A review of PHERP by the Department was undertaken between August 2004 and April 2005 with a comprehensive national consultation process to engage universities, State and Territory health departments and other organisations. Implementation of the review's main findings will commence in 2005-06. |
| Target: Quality: Improved notification and quality of communicable disease data. | |
|
Result: Target met. |
Improvements have been achieved in the quality of communicable disease data. Data is transmitted on a daily basis from the State and Territories into a national data acquisition system, and standard case definitions for notifiable disease have been adopted by all jurisdictions. The Department also reports fortnightly to the Communicable Diseases Network Australia regarding national notifiable diseases data. This supercedes previous individual State and Territory reports and is a refinement of the notification process. |
| Target: Quantity: Rates of childhood immunisation coverage, as recorded by the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register. | |
| Result: No target number was specified in 2004-05. |
The immunisation coverage rate, as notified by the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR), for infants at 12 months of age was 91% as at 30 June 2005. |
| Target: Quality: Development and evaluation of initiatives, under the National Immunisation Program, to continue to improve immunisation coverage and to reduce the incidence of vaccine preventable diseases. | |
| Result: Target met. | In addition to the ongoing program monitoring and evaluation under the National Immunisation Program, the universal National Childhood Pneumococcal Vaccination Program and National Pneumococcal Vaccination Program for Older Australians successfully commenced on 1 January 2005. New initiatives developed in 2004-05 were announced in the 2005-06 Budget including the revision of immunisation advisory arrangements and ongoing and additional funding for National Immunisation Program Support Activities. In March 2005, two new programs for injectable polio vaccine and chicken pox vaccine were announced and will commence on 1 November 2005. Evaluations of the National Q Fever Management Program, the Young Adult MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) Program, and the Influenza Vaccination Program for Older Australians were completed in 2004-05. |
| Target: Quality: Improved management and quality of information notified to the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Department funded the ACIR Field Officer's Initiative during the first six months of 2004-05. The field officers worked with general practitioners and other local providers to improve the capture, management and quality of data supplied to the ACIR. |
| Target: Quality: Limiting the spread of HIV/AIDS and hepatitis C and minimising the social and personal impact of these diseases through improved responsiveness under the new strategies. | |
| Result: Target met. | The fifth National HIV/AIDS Strategy and the second National Hepatitis C Strategy were completed by June 2005. The Department developed these strategies following extensive consultation with other Australian Government agencies, State and Territory governments and other key stakeholders. The new strategies will provide a framework for improved responsiveness through continued national action focussing on education, prevention and collaboration. |
| Target: Quality: Implement initiatives that continue to reduce transmission of blood-borne viruses. | |
| Result: Target met. | Initiatives that have been implemented in 2004-05 by the Department to reduce the transmission of blood-borne viruses include:
|
| Target: Quality: Management of projects to support Food Safety Standards to the satisfaction of stakeholders. | |
| Result: Target met. | In 2004-05, the Department:
|
| Target: Quality: Improved data on foodborne illness using OzFoodNet which provides accurate information on extent and causes of foodborne illness. | |
| Result: Target met. | In 2004–05, the OzFoodNet network managed by the Department continued to investigate and improve surveillance of foodborne illness around Australia. The Foodborne Illness in Australia report was published, providing the most comprehensive and accurate data currently available on the incidence and causes of foodborne illness in Australia. The Department played an integral role in editing, producing, publishing and funding this report. To support the Biosecurity Surveillance System, OzFoodNet trialled a web-based database used to capture information on patients during outbreaks of foodborne illness affecting multiple jurisdictions. The system significantly reduced the time taken to gather national information during outbreaks. |
| Target: Quality: Effective response to requests for antidotes and vaccines. | |
| Result: Not applicable. | There are response mechanisms in place for handling requests for antidotes and vaccines. However, there were no requests in 2004-05 for any stockpile components. |
| Target: Quality: Time taken to establish a stockpile. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Department continues to develop a comprehensive National Medical Stockpile along with plans for deployment of the stockpile. New items for acquisition have been identified based on national threat assessments. |
| Target: Quality: Implementation of the Non-Government Organisation Treatment Grants Program with funding for new, or the expansion of existing, treatment services. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Non-Government Organisation Treatment Grants Program continues to be implemented through 177 drug treatment service organisations. The Department has contracts with these organisations until 30 June 2006. |
| Target: Quality: Ongoing evaluation of the National Drug Strategic Framework. | |
| Result: Target met. | The National Drug Strategic Framework was externally evaluated in 2003 and this informed the development of the National Drug Strategy (NDS) 2004-09. The NDS 2004-09 will be subject to a robust evaluation and monitoring process, as agreed to by the Ministerial Council on Drugs Strategy in May 2005. |
| Target: Quality: Health promotion activities to address misuse of alcohol information dissemination and awareness raising strategies. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Australian Alcohol Guidelines and the
concept of a 'Standard Drink' were used to address this target
in 2004-05. The Department distributed health promotion resource materials,
such as the standard drink measuring glasses, coasters and posters, to licensed
venues, government and non-government organisations, and consumers. The Indigenous Alcohol Guidelines were also funded as part of this target. |
| Target: Quality: Further development of the National Tobacco Strategy, including plans for national policy post June 2004, in line with a sound evidence base and the need to respond to new and emerging trends in tobacco control. | |
| Result: Target met. | Following extensive stakeholder consultation, a new five year National Tobacco Strategy was developed and endorsed by the Ministerial Council on Drugs Strategy on 12 November 2004. The National Tobacco Strategy 2004-09 builds on existing tobacco control efforts and achievements by the Australian Government and State and Territory governments, and is further enhanced by research into effective international tobacco control strategies. It is a long-term framework which builds on initiatives undertaken by the Department in the previous National Drug Strategy 1999–2003-04. In May 2005, two new initiatives were announced: Strengthening Cancer Care – quitting smoking during pregnancy; and the National Tobacco Youth Campaign. |
| Target: Quality: Specific Australian Government activities under Eat Well Australia implemented in a timely manner. | |
| Result: Target met. | Specific activities under Eat Well Australia in 2004-05 included:
Programs were implemented as planned. Some projects under the National Child Nutrition Program were extended because some recipients of grants did not complete their projects to the expected timetable. |
| Target: Quality: Continued dissemination and promotion of the Australian Dietary Guidelines. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Department continued to widely disseminate and promote the Australian Dietary Guidelines across Australia. All resources associated with the dietary guidelines, such as scientific background papers and Food for Health consumer packages, have been promoted. On average 28,000 Food for Health resources are distributed each month. The national 'Go for 2 &5™' fruit and vegetable campaign to promote increased consumption of fruit and vegetables launched in April 2005 includes campaign materials which are based on the Australian Dietary Guidelines. |
| Target: Quality: Develop and implement a national approach to obesity, Healthy Weight 2008, through the National Obesity Taskforce, for children and their parents, adults and older people. | |
| Result: Target met. | In 2004-05, the National Obesity Taskforce continued to implement strategies for children and young people, and six initiatives were announced by Health Ministers in July 2004. This year the Department developed:
In March 2005, the Department commenced research into strategies to reduce the prevalence of obesity in adults and older people. This work is being undertaken on behalf of the National Obesity Taskforce. |
| Target: Quality: Initiatives had a positive impact and achieved their objectives (as evidenced by program evaluations). | |
| Result: Target met. | In 2004-05, health promotion projects were designed by the Department with the goal of reducing alcohol related harm. The projects target alcohol consumers through specially designed materials and activities that are based on the Australian Alcohol Guidelines. Results from preliminary evaluations of the material and the dissemination process showed over 90% acceptance rates by the recipients of the materials. |
| Target: Quality: The development, implementation and/or evaluation of social marketing programs in key population health areas, such as alcohol, illicit drugs, cancer screening and immunisation. | |
| Result: Target met. | The development by the Department of the second phase of the National Illicit Drugs Campaign which targets youth with illicit drug prevention messages and the national 'Go for 2 & 5™' campaign were strongly guided by market research to ensure they met the communications objectives established for each initiative. |
| Target: Quality: Implementation of a broader communication strategy using collaborative bodies and partnership arrangements as well as web-based tools to convey population health research, data and information, particularly in regard to lifestyle risk factors. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Healthy and Active website is a vehicle to access information on the national 'Go for 2 & 5™' fruit and vegetable promotion campaign, and Healthy School Communities Grant Program. In addition, the website provides evidence-based information for consumers and health professionals on healthy eating and physical activity. The second phase of the National Illicit Drugs Campaign, a prevention campaign targeting youth, was launched in April 2005. The campaign aims to educate young people and their parents about the risks and negative consequences of illicit drug use through print, television and cinema advertising, website resource materials and other communication activities. |
| Target: Quantity: At least 2 social marketing programs in key population health areas. | |
| Result: Target met. | National social marketing programs supporting the prevention of illicit drug use amongst young people and encouraging the increased consumption of fruit and vegetables were implemented in April 2005. |
| Target: Quality: Evaluation of the National Injury Prevention Plan to measure the progress in implementation of strategies and programs that aim to contribute to a reduction in the incidence and severity of injuries in the Plan's four priority areas: falls in the elderly, falls in children, poisoning and drowning/near drowning. Evaluation will report in late 2004. | |
| Result: Target met. | A process evaluation of the National Injury Prevention Plan: Priorities for 2001-03 and the National Injury Prevention Plan: Priorities for 2001-03 Implementation Plan was undertaken by the Department between April and August 2004. The evaluation report has informed the development of the National Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion Plan 2004- 2014, which continues to include the same four priority areas. |
| Target: Quality: Development of the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Injury Prevention Plan to implement strategies and programs designed to reduce the incidence and severity of injuries in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, and minimising the impact of injuries to the health and well-being of those communities. | |
| Result: Target met. | In 2004-05, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Safety Promotion Strategy (formerly known as the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Injury Prevention Plan) was completed following an extensive consultation process. This is expected to be endorsed by Health Ministers during 2005-06. |
| Target: Quality: The extent to which strategies and programs under the National Injury Prevention Plan have been implemented. | |
| Result: Target met. | In 2004-05, a range of programs and projects that support the strategies identified under the National Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion Plan 2004-2014 were developed and implemented, including:
|
| Target: Quantity: Number of people participating in the Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot by site. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot Program ran from November 2002 to June 2004. 56,907 invitations were sent to people eligible to participate in the Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot. These were sent to 11,045 people from Mackay, 18,431 people from Adelaide and 27,431 people from Melbourne. A total of 25,840 invitees responded by returning a completed Faecal Occult Blood Test, giving an overall participation rate of 45.4%. |
| Target: Quality: To promote choice and access to a range of sexual and reproductive health services. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Family Planning Program provides access to differing perspectives, resources and tools to help all Australians make informed decisions about sexual health, reproductive health and family planning. In 2004-05, funding for State and Territory Family Planning Organisations was incorporated into the new Public Health Outcome Funding Agreements (PHOFAs). |
| Target: Quality: Completion of demonstration projects in chronic disease self-management and progress towards completion of evaluation. | |
| Result: Target met. | Demonstration projects were completed on 30 June 2004. National evaluation of the demonstration projects were completed and a report was provided to the Department in March 2005. Key findings included improvements in health status and symptom control, reductions in up to 2 GP visits and up to 2 overnight hospital stays per person per year. |
| Target: Quality: Raise awareness of the use of lifestyle scripts in primary care. | |
| Result: Target met. | In 2004-05, a set of lifestyle script resources for use in the primary care setting, were developed and tested by the Department. The process of developing these resources, particularly the consultations, provided a unique opportunity to ensure Divisions of General Practice and other health professional organisations were made aware of the key elements of this initiative. These resources for health care providers and consumers will be distributed to participating practices in August and September 2005. |
| Target: Quality: Dissemination and utilisation by GPs of guidelines relating to lifestyle risk factors. | |
| Result: Target met. |
In 2004-05, the Department disseminated a range of guidelines relating to lifestyle risk factors:
|
| Target: Quality: Effective carriage of remaining processes for negotiation and finalisation of the FCTC, in accordance with the whole-of-government position. | |
| Result: Target met. | Australia formally ratified the FCTC on 27 October 2004. The FCTC came into effect on 27 February 2005, making the provisions of the Treaty legally binding for contracting parties. Australia currently meets all the FCTC requirements. |
| Target: Quality: Timely payment of contributions to international organisations including the WHO and the International Agency for Research on Cancer to which Australia is under treaty and MoU obligations to pay an assessed contribution. | |
| Result: Target met. | All payments were made on time to the WHO and its subsidiary organisations: the International Agency for Research on Cancer and the International Program for Chemical Safety. |
| Target: Quality: A high level of satisfaction of the Ministers, Parliamentary Secretary and Ministers' Offices with the relevance, quality and timeliness of policy advice, Question Time Briefs, Parliamentary Questions on Notice and briefings. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Minister and Minister's Office were satisfied with the relevance, quality and timeliness of policy advice, Question Time Briefs, Parliamentary Questions on Notice and briefings. |
| Target: Quantity: 95% of requests for information on public health issues are successfully responded to. | |
| Result: Target met. | For example, in the quarter ending 30 June 2005, Population Health Division's Frontdesk received 287 email enquiries. Of those enquiries, 276 (96%) were responded to and resolved satisfactorily within 21 days. |
| Target: Quality: Positive feedback from international organisations and other countries on Australian contributions. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Department received notes of thanks from the Secretariats and other Member States of the WHO and OECD for its contribution to meetings and working groups. |
| Target: Quality: Responses contribute to the work of each organisation. | |
| Result: Target met. | Effective contributions resulting in successful outcomes consistent with Australia's priorities. Resolutions adopted by the WHO and decisions by governing bodies of the OECD are consistent with Australia's international health objectives. |
| Target: Quality: Positive feedback from stakeholders regarding implementation of COAG food reforms and ongoing food policy development. | |
| Result: Target met. | In 2004-05, positive feedback in the form of submissions and discussions were received from stakeholders regarding the implementation of COAG food reforms and ongoing food policy development, including the implementation of outcomes from two stakeholder consultation processes. The Department provides a leadership role at a national level in the coordination of policy advice on the regulation of food. |
| Target: Quality: Positive feedback from stakeholders regarding work undertaken to reduce foodborne illness in Australia. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Department manages OzFoodNet which assists in reducing foodborne illness. OzFoodNet received positive feedback from stakeholders at a Strategic Planning Meeting held in August 2004. Participants at the meeting reinforced the key role that OzFoodNet plays at a national level in the investigation, surveillance and control of foodborne illness. An OzFoodNet Advanced Foodborne Disease Investigation Workshop also received positive feedback regarding epidemiologist training sessions held in Australia in May 2005. Participants put the principles learnt at the workshop into practice during a multistate investigation into an outbreak of Salmonella Hvittingfoss. |
| Target: Quality: Timely production of evidence-based policy research. | |
| Result: Target met. | In 2004-05, research activities included:
|
| Target: Quality: Opportunity for stakeholders to participate in policy and program development. | |
| Result: Target met. | The following are examples of stakeholder participation in policy and program development:
|
| Target: Quality: A high level of stakeholder satisfaction with the timely development and implementation of national strategies. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Department received positive feedback from stakeholders in 2004-05, examples included:
|
| Target: Quality: Budget predictions are met and actual expenses vary less than 5% from budgeted expenses. | |
| Result: Target met. | Reviews confirm that targets have been achieved. |
| Target: Quality: 100% of payments are made accurately and in accordance with negotiated service standards. | |
| Result: Target met. | Reviews confirm that targets have been achieved. |
| Target: Quality: A high level of stakeholder satisfaction with the relevance, quality and timeliness of information and education services. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Department received positive responses from stakeholders in response to:
|
| Target: Quality: Placements arranged to achieve optimum development of WHO fellows. | |
| Result: Target met. | In 2004-05, 193 placements were arranged by the Department for all fellows referred to Australian Institutions. The Department also supported the WHO in evaluations to ensure optimum outcomes from the program. |
| Target: Quantity: In the order of 860 grants and contracts administered. | |
| Result: Target met. | The Department administered over 1,000 grants and contracts in 2004-05. |
| Target: Quality: Ongoing administration of the eight Public Health Outcome Funding Agreements agreed with each State and Territory. | |
| Result: Target met. | All State and Territory governments have signed the new PHOFAs for the period 2004-05 to 2008-09. The PHOFAs are consistent with the Australian Government's guidelines on Specific Purpose Payments and were signed within the required timeframe. All State and Territory governments are paid on a monthly basis under the agreements. The State and Territory governments are required to provide annual financial acquittal statements and performance reports against the nationally agreed performance indicators to the Australian Government. The first financial statements and performance reports under the new PHOFAs are due by 30 November 2005. |
| Evaluation/Review: | National Illicit Drug Strategy Non-Government Organisation Treatment Grants Program. |
| Timeframe: | This evaluation was not undertaken due to uncertainty about ongoing Budget funding post 30 June 2006. As this issue was resolved in the 2005-06 Budget, the evaluation will be undertaken as a priority in 2005-06. |
| Related Performance Indicator: |
Indicator 2. |
| URL/Web Address for published results: |
Not applicable. |
| Evaluation/Review: | Review of the Public Health Education and Research Program. |
| Timeframe: |
Commencement date: August 2004 End date: April 2005 |
| Related Performance Indicator: |
Indicator 3. |
| URL/Web Address for published results: |
(www.health.gov.au/internet/WCMS/Publishing.nsf/content/Pherp-review-pdf-review-report-cnt.htm) |
Produced by the Portfolio Strategies Division, Australian
Government Department of Health and Ageing.
URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/annrpt/publishing.nsf/Content/performance-indicators-1
If you would like to know more or give us your comments contact: annrep@health.gov.au