Administered Funding – Health Workforce Capacity Programs |
|
|---|---|
Including: 12.1 Rural Workforce; and 12.2 Workforce. |
|
Indicator: |
An expansion of specialist training opportunities in settings outside of public teaching hospitals. |
Measured by: |
Funding provided to enable an expansion in specialist training settings. |
Reference Point/Target: |
At least 15 new specialist training positions funded in settings outside of public teaching hospitals in 2007–08. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
The Department met the target of at least 15 new specialist training positions funded in settings outside of public teaching hospitals, with 98 new positions funded in expanded training settings in 2007–08. This is in addition to 48 specialist training positions in expanded settings for psychiatry funded under Outcome 11 – Mental Health. These training positions were all accredited by the relevant specialist medical college and approved by the relevant state or territory health department. |
|
Indicator: |
Students of rural origin supported to study allied health disciplines. |
Measured by: |
Scholarships awarded to rural students in allied health disciplines. |
Reference Point/Target: |
65 new scholarships to be awarded in 2007. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
The Department exceeded the target for this program, awarding 95 scholarships to rural origin students in 2007–08. Assistance was also provided to over 160 practising rural and remote allied health professionals to undertake continuing professional development activities under the Australian Rural and Remote Health Professional Scholarship Scheme. |
|
Indicator: |
Achievement of the required number of medical students completing a year of rural training. |
Measured by: |
Percentage figures for students undertaking a year of rural training at fully operational Rural Clinical Schools. |
Reference Point/Target: |
25% of Australian Government supported medical students to complete a year of rural training during their degree. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
In 2007, 27.5% of Australian Government supported medical students (at universities participating in the Rural Clinical Schools Program) completed at least one year of rural training prior to graduation. |
|
Indicator: |
Expansion of the University Departments of Rural Health Program. |
Measured by: |
Funding provided to enable an additional university to fully participate in this initiative. |
Reference Point/Target: |
One new University Department of Rural Health established. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
Funding for the Monash University Department of Rural and Indigenous Health was increased in 2007–08 to parity levels with the other ten University Departments of Rural Health. The Monash University Department of Rural and Indigenous Health was recognised as a University Department of Rural Health in mid 2006. However, it was not able to operate as a full University Department of Rural Health until it was allocated additional funding by the Department in 2007–08, including infrastructure support for its key site at Moe in Victoria. As a result, the Department was able to increase the number of fully operational University Departments of Rural Health to 11. |
|
Indicator: |
Additional suitability qualified overseas trained doctors in outer metropolitan, rural and remote districts of workforce shortage. |
Measured by: |
a) Number of additional overseas trained doctors in locations of identified shortage. b) Uptake of training and support programs by overseas trained doctors. |
Reference Point/Target:
|
a) At least 50% of the placements to be located in outer metropolitan, rural and remote and districts of workforce shortage. b) 200 new scholarships to be awarded in 2007–08. |
Result: Indicator substantially met. |
|
178 overseas trained doctors were recruited and commenced working in outer metropolitan, rural, remote districts of workforce shortage during 2007–08. Of these, 63% were located in rural and remote locations. Of the 200 new scholarships available in 2007–08, only 147 were awarded. |
|
Output Group 1 – Policy Advice |
|
|---|---|
Indicator: |
Quality, relevant and timely advice for Australian Government decision-making. |
Measured by: |
Ministerial satisfaction. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Maintain or increase from previous year. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
Ministers were satisfied with the advice provided by the Department for Australian Government decision-making. This is on par with ministerial satisfaction in 2006–07. |
|
Indicator: |
Relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. |
Measured by: |
Production of relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
In 2007–08, research was undertaken in a range of health workforce areas. For example, market research was commissioned to ascertain consumer attitudes toward medical treatment by specialist trainees. This broadly focused research informed the development of the Expanded Specialist Training Program, which is furthering the expansion of specialist training into health care settings outside of teaching hospitals. Research into administrative, funding and reporting models to support implementation of the Expanded Specialist Training Program was also commissioned. |
|
Output Group 2 – Program Management |
|
|---|---|
Indicator: |
Administered budget predictions are met and actual expenses vary less than 0.5% from budgeted expenses. |
Measured by: |
Percentage that actual expenses vary from budgeted expenses. |
Reference Point/Target: |
0.5% variance from budgeted expenses. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
Actual expenses varied by 0.47% from budgeted expenses in 2007–08. |
|
Indicator: |
Stakeholders to participate in program development. |
Measured by: |
Opportunities for stakeholder participation through a range of avenues, such as surveys, conferences and meetings. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Stakeholders participate in program development. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
The Department facilitated the implementation of the Council of Australian Governments Nationally Consistent Assessment of International Medical Graduates by hosting meetings and providing the Chair and secretariat services for the Implementation Committee. The committee comprised representatives of state and territory medical boards, health departments, specialist medical colleges, the Australian Medical Council, the Australian Medical Association, postgraduate medical councils and consumer organisations. Stakeholders were involved in the development of allocation strategies, and eligibility and guidance material for the Support for Allied Health in Rural and Remote Areas initiative. |
|
Produced by the Portfolio Strategies Division, Australian
Government Department of Health and Ageing.
URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/annrpt/publishing.nsf/Content/outcome-12-part-2-performance-information-4
If you would like to know more or give us your comments contact: annrep@health.gov.au