Administered Funding – Health System Capacity and Quality Programs |
|
|---|---|
Including: 10.1 Chronic Diseases – Treatment; 10.2 e-Health Implementation; 10.3 Health Information; 10.4 International Policy Engagement; 10.5 Palliative Care and Community Awareness; and 10.6 Research Capacity. |
|
Indicator: |
Initiatives that prevent type 2 diabetes, modify the prevalence of type 2 diabetes risk factors, and improve management of diabetes. |
Measured by: |
Initiatives will be assessed against the Health Priority Areas – National Diabetes Indicators. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Continued programs and initiatives to prevent type 2 diabetes, modify the prevalence of type 2 diabetes risk factors or improve management of diabetes. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
The Department funded the Ballarat Health Services and the University of Ballarat to engage Diabetes Prevention Pilot Initiative participants to identify strategies to reinforce previous learning and embed positive health behaviours. This work aims to prevent diabetes and reduce risk factors for diabetes and associated complications. The Department also established a National Centre for Monitoring Chronic Kidney Disease at the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare to increase awareness and understanding of kidney disease, and inform the improved management of kidney disease in an effort to reduce diabetes complications. The Department continues to invest in good datasets to monitor chronic diseases. |
|
Top of page
Indicator: |
Diagnosis, treatment and support of people with cancer and their families. |
Measured by: |
Programs and initiatives for improved diagnosis, treatment and support of cancer patients and their families. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Lessened impact of cancer for Australians through programs and initiatives. |
Result: Indicator substantially met. |
|
The Department, in collaboration with Cancer Australia, administered elements of the Strengthening Cancer Care initiative to improve the coordination of the national cancer effort; to provide increased research funding for cancer care; and to enhance cancer prevention and screening programs. The Department, through funding of the National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre to improve approaches to the early detection and management of breast and ovarian cancer, and funding of the Breast Cancer Network Australia, to produce and distribute resources for women diagnosed with breast cancer, provided better support and treatment for those living with cancer and increased support for the professionals who care for cancer patients. To increase the number of, and access to, services able to provide quality care for palliative patients both in an in-patient setting and during their transition to home, the fourth round of Local Palliative Care Grants focused on fit out and equipment and transition to home support. Fifty-eight organisations received funding of up to $100,000. The projects are scheduled for completion by April 2009. |
|
Top of page
Indicator: |
Key stakeholders use electronic clinical communications to improve quality and safety in health care. |
Measured by: |
Use of electronic clinical communications by key stakeholders. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Increased use of electronic communications by key stakeholders in the health sector for electronic prescribing. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
Key stakeholders in the health sector, such as general practitioners, and pathology and radiology service providers, used more than 300 million clinical communications in 2007–08. These communications included specialist referrals, hospital discharge summaries, prescriptions and reports such as pathology and diagnostic imaging. While a large proportion of clinical communications were produced in electronic form, a small but growing number of these were machine-readable, enabling enhanced decision support by clinicians. |
|
Top of page
Indicator: |
Improved quality of, and access to, online health information and Australian Government health policy by medical professionals and the Australian public. |
Measured by: |
Quality online health information is made available through the HealthInsite program. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Improved access and quality information. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
In 2007–08, there were over 16,000 information items on the websites of 84 Information Partners accessible to users of HealthInsite , compared with over 14,000 items in 2006–07. HealthInsite Information Partners are authorative health organisations that have gone through a quality assessment process to ensure that their sites are of the highest standard and provide reliable and relevant information. There was a 29% growth in the use of HealthInsite from 2007 to 2008, compared with 18% from 2006 to 2007. During this time HealthInsite demonstrated a 99.9% measured availability. On average approximately 15,000 unique users per day visited the HealthInsite website during 2007–08 (accessible at http://www.healthinsite.gov.au). |
|
Top of page
Indicator: |
Establishment of managed health networks with the capacity to support secure electronic messaging and shared health records. |
Measured by: |
Level of access to improved connectivity, shared information and digital applications. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Managed health networks developed to support health care providers. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
The Department administered funding for 38 grants to establish managed health networks which provide improved connectivity, shared information and access to digital applications as follows:
|
|
Top of page
Indicator: |
Australian Government investment in the National e-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA) contributes to the development of nationally consistent e-Health standards and basic infrastructure. |
Measured by: |
Timely and quality contributions to NEHTA during the development of priority e-Health initiatives. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Timely input to NEHTA programs and ensure NEHTA work is delivered within agreed timeframes. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
The Department ensured timely and high quality input to National e-Health Transition Authority programs by actively contributing to the Stakeholder Reference Forum and the National Health Chief Information Officers Forum. The Department contributed to the development of nationally consistent e-Health standards and basic infrastructure through the National e-Health Transition Authority, Jurisdictional Reference Group and other National e-Health Transition Authority Project Reference Groups. This support ensures the alignment of e-Health standards and infrastructure development. It also impacts across jurisdictions and facilitates the progress of:
|
|
Top of page
Indicator: |
Effective international health policy engagement. |
Measured by: |
Feedback from international organisations. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Domestic health policy informed by international experience. Australian contribution to health policy and programs in our region acknowledged. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
In accordance with Australia's domestic priorities, the Department continued to have significant input into decisions (for example, avian influenza virus sharing and public health innovation and intellectual property) made by global organisations, such as the World Health Organization and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, in international health policy. The feedback the Department received from these organisations assisted in the development of domestic health policy such as avian virus sharing. The Department continued to strengthen its engagement in the region by taking a prominent role in the management of the Pacific Senior Health Officials' Network and chairing the new APEC Health Working Group on 12-13 February 2008. Several APEC Economies have sought Australia's support to sponsor their project proposal. |
|
Top of page
Indicator: |
Effective management of Memorandum of Understanding arrangements with the World Health Organization. |
Measured by: |
Timeliness of contributions. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Contributions made as per arranged agreements. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
The Department made all payments on time and in accordance with Memorandum of Understanding arrangements. |
|
Top of page
Indicator: |
Support for Australia's health and medical research. |
Measured by: |
Implemented funding initiatives that enhance health and medical research capacity. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Contributions made as per arranged agreements. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
In 2007–08, the Department distributed $11.5 million to 24 medical research organisations for a range of medical research activities aimed at improving the health and well being of Australians. |
|
Output Group 1 – Policy Advice |
|
|---|---|
Indicator: |
Quality, relevant and timely advice for Australian Government decision-making. |
Measured by: |
Ministerial satisfaction. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Maintain or increase from previous year. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
Ministers were satisfied with the advice provided by the Department for Australian Government decision-making. This is on par with ministerial satisfaction in 2006–07. |
|
Indicator: |
Relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. |
Measured by: |
Production of relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
In 2007–08, the Department provided additional funding to the National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre to improve the care and support of cancer patients affected by lymphoedema. As part of the funding, the centre undertook an evidence base review on the incidence, prevention, risk factors and treatment of secondary lymphoedema, to inform the development of evidence-based education and information programs for health professionals and consumers. |
|
Output Group 2 – Program Management |
|
|---|---|
Indicator: |
Administered budget predictions are met and actual expenses vary less than 0.5% from budgeted expenses. |
Measured by: |
Percentage that actual expenses vary from budgeted expenses. |
Reference Point/Target: |
0.5% variance from budgeted expenses. |
Result: Indicator not met. |
|
There were underspends in a number of Outcome 10 programs which resulted in a -9.9% variance from budgeted expenses. |
|
Indicator: |
Stakeholders to participate in program development. |
Measured by: |
Opportunities for stakeholder participation through a range of avenues, such as surveys, conferences and meetings. |
Reference Point/Target: |
Stakeholders participate in program development through consultation mechanisms, and submissions on departmental discussion papers. |
Result: Indicator met. |
|
Palliative Care Australia was an active participant in the Palliative Care Medicines Working Group, which provided advice to the Department on palliative care medicines. The organisation, in concert with other stakeholders, provided useful input into the development of a more targeted approach to consumer information on access to, and quality use of palliative care medicines. |
|
Strengthening Cancer Care Initiative |
|
|---|---|
Commencement Date: |
The evaluation of the Strengthening Cancer Care Initiative was delayed. |
End Date: |
Not applicable. |
Related Key Strategic Direction/ Performance Indicator: |
Reduced Burden of Cancer, and Support for Australians Living with Cancer. Diagnosis, treatment and support of people with cancer and their families. |
Better Arthritis and Osteoporosis Care Initiative |
|
|---|---|
Commencement date: |
The umbrella evaluation of the Better Arthritis and Osteoporosis Care Initiative has been postponed to 2009. |
End date: |
June 2010. |
Related Performance Indicator: |
Relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. Stakeholders to participate in program development. |
Produced by the Portfolio Strategies Division, Australian
Government Department of Health and Ageing.
URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/annrpt/publishing.nsf/Content/outcome-10-part-2-performance-information-4
If you would like to know more or give us your comments contact: annrep@health.gov.au