You are in:
Improved access to public hospitals, acute care services and public dental services, including through targeted strategies, and payments to state and territory governments
Outcome 13 aims to improve the efficiency of, and access to, public hospitals and acute care services by delivering major reforms through the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) National Health Reform Agreement, and National Partnership Agreements on Hospital and Health Workforce Reform, Improving Public Hospital Services, Elective Surgery Waiting List Reduction Plan and Health Infrastructure. The Department worked to achieve this Outcome by managing initiatives under the programs outlined below.
Program 13.1 aims to support a nationally coordinated approach to organ and tissue donation for transplantation and support access to an adequate, safe, secure and affordable supply of blood and blood products.
In 2011-12, the Department continued to assist the implementation of reforms aimed at establishing Australia as a world leader in organ and tissue donation, by providing advice and governance support to the Australian Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Authority. The reforms aim to achieve a significant and lasting increase to the number of life-saving and life-transforming transplants for Australians through the introduction of nationally consistent donation processes and systems in hospital settings, supported by dedicated donation specialists, together with a nationally coordinated approach to community and professional awareness and education.
The Department continued to fund the Australian Bone Marrow Donor Registry to maximise the chance of a suitable donor match, either in Australia or overseas, for a patient needing a bone marrow, cord blood or peripheral blood stem cell transplant. In 2011-12, the Registry undertook 648 donor searches on behalf of Australian patients, with 271 Australian patients with leukaemia or other life-threatening haematological or immune system diseases receiving a bone marrow, peripheral blood or cord blood transplant. Through the Bone Marrow Transplant Program, the Department approved financial assistance for 192 patients in Australia, for the costs of obtaining and transporting bone marrow or stem cells from international donors.
KPI: Percentage of eligible Australians in need of a bone marrow, cord blood or peripheral stem cell transplant who are able to access appropriate treatment.
2011-12 Target: 100% 2011-12 Actual: 100% Result: Met.
To be eligible for appropriate treatment, Australians in need of a bone marrow, cord blood or peripheral stem cell transplant will require a suitably matched donor. The Australian Bone Marrow Donor Registry (ABMDR) will search its registry for a suitable match. If a match is not found in Australia, the ABMDR will search international registries. In 2011-12, 139 Australians accessed treatment through the Australian Bone Marrow Donor Registry and 146 Australians accessed treatment through international registries. Australia provided 85 bone marrow, cord blood or peripheral blood stem cell donations to overseas recipients.
The Department also funded the National Cord Blood Collection Network to collect, process, bank and release high quality, compatible umbilical cord blood stem cell units to Australian and international transplant centres for patients in need of a transplant. In 2011-12, 51 Australian patients received single or double cord blood unit transplants, utilising 38 cord blood units from the Australian inventory. The Network imported 27 cord blood units from international registries for those patients for whom a suitably matched unit was not available from within the Australian inventory. In addition, 52 units were exported to international patients.
Deliverable: Number of banked cord blood units.
2011-12 Target: Total: 2,379 2011-12 Actual: Total: 810 Result: Not met.
Indigenous: 129 Indigenous: 94
In 2011-12, a total of 1,835 cord blood units were collected of which 1,025 remain subject to regulatory clearance therefore they have not been included in the banked figure (810). The number of cord blood units collected overall, including from Indigenous donors, was below target. This was due to several factors including staff turnover, delays in recruitment in cord blood banks, delayed implementation of anticipated regulatory changes that would reduce processing times, and delayed execution of funding agreements due to extended negotiations with jurisdictions.
Collection and banking activities reached full capacity once new funding arrangements came into effect from November 2011. Cord blood banks increased collection activities for the remainder of 2011-12. Taking into account the 6 month cord blood unit testing period, the results of these efforts are expected to be realised in increased banking numbers in 2012-13.
Historically, the target for Indigenous donors has been challenging. Implementation of the new collection strategies that target donations from Indigenous mothers at all Network centres should assist in increasing the number of Indigenous donors.
Deliverable: The Clinical Services Plan is implemented by the National Cord Blood Collection Network.
2011-12 Reference Point: Agreed collection and banking strategies implemented.
Result: Met.
The Department supported the National Cord Blood Collection Network in implementing a four-year Clinical Services Plan (2011-12 to 2014-15) to increase the number, quality and genetic diversity of cord blood units collected in Australia.
Collection and banking strategies were fully implemented, including: establishing revised collection criteria for Indigenous cord blood units across all collection centres; strengthening activity in catchment areas with genetic diversity; and determining cord blood unit minimum cell count thresholds. These activities will increase the likelihood of a compatible unit being available for Australian patients from within the Australian inventory.
In 2012-13, additional efforts will focus on engaging dedicated education officers to communicate with ethnically diverse communities and align testing and banking procedures with expected regulatory changes.
The Department continued to support access to an appropriate, affordable and quality blood supply, by delivering the Australian Government’s contribution of 63 per cent of the funding to the blood sector through the National Blood Agreement, providing governance support to the National Blood Authority (NBA), and chairing and membership of the Jurisdictional Blood Committee (JBC).
The Department continued to work with the JBC to develop strategies for better forecasting and demand management.
Deliverable: Percentage of the total contribution, made by the Australian Government, to the approved National Supply Plan and Budget.
2011-12 Target: 63% 2011-12 Actual: 63% Result: Met.
The Australian Government contributed 63% of the approved National Supply Plan and Budget, with state and territory governments providing the remaining 37%.
Deliverable: The National Supply Plan and Budget developed by the Jurisdictional Blood Committee is agreed by all Health Ministers.
2011-12 Reference Point: National Supply Plan and Budget agreed by all Health Ministers annually.
Result: Met.
Health Ministers agreed to the 2012-13 National Supply Plan and Budget on 27 April 2012.
The Department continued to contribute to the Hepatitis C Litigation Settlement Scheme, which provides a contribution to the out-of-court settlement costs for eligible individuals who contracted Hepatitis C as a result of a blood transfusion in Australia between 1985 and 1991.
In 2011-12, the Department continued to work with the states and territories (through the JBC), the NBA, and the Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC) to implement the health technology assessment framework for blood and blood products. This will help to ensure that patients get access to blood products that have been proven to be safe, effective and cost-effective.
KPI: Percentage of applications for funding of new blood products assessed by the MSAC in a timely manner.
2011-12 Target: 80% 2011-12 Actual: Not applicable. Result: Not applicable.
The MSAC has not yet received proposals. Appropriate referral pathways and assessment methods continue to be developed.
Deliverable: Produce relevant and timely evidence-based policy research.
2011-12 Reference Point: Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner.
Result: Met.
The Department continued to provide high quality and timely advice to Ministers on organ and tissue donation and blood issues based on evidence-based policy research.
Deliverable: Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues.
2011-12 Reference Point: Stakeholders participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings.
Result: Met.
The Department worked with state and territory governments and sector representatives to improve access to blood and blood products and organ and tissue transplants by ensuring that policy directions consider the perspectives of all stakeholders. The Department consulted stakeholders through regular meetings of the JBC, the National Cord Blood Collection Network (AusCord) Management Committee and the Australian Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Authority State Medical Director committee meetings.
Deliverable: Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses.
2011-12 Target: ≤0.5% 2011-12 Actual: -0.8% Result: Substantially met.
The majority of expenditure is for the National Blood Supply Plan and Budget which is demand driven.
Program 13.2 aims to ensure the stability of the medical indemnity insurance industry, ensure that indemnity insurance products are affordable for doctors, and ensure indemnity insurance is available for midwives.
The Indemnity Insurance Fund (the Fund)136 was established in August 2011, consolidating existing programs that support medical indemnity. The programs included under the Fund are: the Premium Support Scheme; the High Cost Claims Scheme; the Run-off Cover Scheme; the Incurred-but-not-reported Scheme; the Exceptional Claims Scheme; the Midwife Professional Indemnity (Commonwealth Contribution) Scheme; and the Midwife Professional Indemnity Run-off Cover Scheme.137
The objective of the Fund is to streamline administrative processes, cut red-tape and improve program efficiency of existing Government schemes.
Medical indemnity insurance is a specialised form of professional indemnity cover that provides surety to medical practitioners and their patients in the events of an adverse incident. Affordable and stable medical and professional indemnity insurance translates to stable fees for patients, and allows the medical workforce to focus on the delivery of high quality medical services.
In 2011-12, the Department continued to administer these schemes with the assistance of the Department of Human Services and contracted medical insurers.
Deliverable: Consultation with stakeholders on implementation arrangements for the Fund.
2011-12 Reference Point: Timely initial contact and follow-up consultation where this is required.
Result: Met.
Stakeholders were advised of implementation arrangements. The legislation enabling the programs consolidated under the Fund has remained unchanged and the programs continue to operate unaffected.
Deliverable: Establishment of administrative arrangements for the Fund.
2011-12 Reference Point: Administrative arrangements in place.
Result: Met.
The Department released operational guidelines for the Fund on 14 November 2011. The guidelines are available on the Department’s website.
Deliverable: Participate and lead the process of developing reports that are published by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare on medical indemnity.
2011-12 Reference Point: Timely provision and analysis of data.
Result: Met.
The Department worked closely with the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and other Medical Indemnity Data Working Group stakeholders to assist in the publication of two reports on medical indemnity claims. The reports present data on both public and private sector medical indemnity claims and an analysis of claim trends over time.
The Department administers a number of schemes (such as the Premium Support Scheme and the Run-off Cover Scheme) designed to maintain and improve premium affordability for medical practitioners.
Deliverable: Percentage of eligible applicants receiving a premium subsidy.
2011-12 Target: 100% 2011-12 Actual: 100% Result: Met.
All eligible doctors, who applied, received a premium subsidy.
KPI: Percentage of medical indemnity insurers who have a Premium Support Scheme (PSS) contract with the Commonwealth that meet the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority’s Minimum Capital Requirement.
2011-12 Target: 100% 2011-12 Actual: 100% Result: Met.
All medical indemnity insurers who have a PSS contract with the Commonwealth meet the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority’s Minimum Capital Requirement.
KPI: Number of doctors that receive a premium subsidy support under the Premium Support Scheme.
2011-12 Target: 2,400 2011-12 Actual: 2,106138 Result: Met.
This is a reduction from the 2,194 doctors who received a premium subsidy in 2010-11. A reduction in the number of doctors receiving a premium subsidy under the Premium Support Scheme is a positive outcome, as it indicates that medical indemnity premiums are affordable.
Privately practising midwives require insurance to meet the requirements of the Government’s National Registration and Accreditation Scheme. The Australian Government has contracted an insurer, Medical Insurance Group Australia (MIGA), to provide professional indemnity insurance to eligible midwives, ensuring that women and their families can access midwifery care. Indemnity insurers are reluctant to offer professional indemnity insurance to midwives, as the small potential premium pool and potentially high risk exposure means it is not commercially viable.
Deliverable: Percentage of eligible midwife applicants covered under the Midwife Professional Indemnity Scheme.
2011-12 Target: 100% 2011-12 Actual: 100% Result: Met.
All eligible privately practising midwives who applied for professional indemnity insurance through MIGA were offered cover.
KPI: The continued availability of professional indemnity insurance for eligible midwives.
2011-12 Reference Point: Maintain contract with Medical Insurance Group Australia to provide professional indemnity insurance to eligible midwives.
Result: Met.
Eligible privately practising midwives were able to purchase Commonwealth supported professional indemnity insurance from MIGA.
Deliverable: Produce relevant and timely evidence-based policy research.
2011-12 Reference Point: Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner.
Result: Met.
The Department provided policy advice on emerging trends in the medical indemnity industry to the Australian Government in a timely manner based on analysis and monitoring of qualitative and quantitative data on medical indemnity trends and issues.
Deliverable: Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues.
2011-12 Reference Point: Stakeholders participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings.
Result: Met.
The Department had regular meetings with the Department of Human Services and the Australian Government Actuary as well as bilateral and multilateral consultations with medical indemnity insurers and other stakeholders to ensure that the medical indemnity program continued to meet its policy objectives. Departmental representatives attended several relevant industry conferences and forums.
Deliverable: Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses.
2011-12 Target: ≤0.5% 2011-12 Actual: 62.0% Result: Not met.
While the deliverable was not met, the program objectives were substantially met. Generally speaking, medical indemnity programs only respond to finalised claims when they are lodged by medical indemnity insurers. Total claims have been less than estimated by the Australian Government Actuary. Any remaining actuarially estimated liabilities are carried forward.
Program 13.3 aims to design and implement far-reaching reforms, including implementation of the Council of Australian Governments’ National Health Reform Agreement to improve patient access to public hospital services. The program also aims to improve hospital performance reporting and accountability; increase efficiency and capacity in public hospitals; improve public access to public dental services; and improve health care services in Tasmania.
The Department in collaboration with the Departments of the Prime Minister and Cabinet and Treasury and states and territories developed the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) National Health Reform Agreement (the Agreement), which sets out the shared intention of the Commonwealth, states and territories to work in partnership to improve health outcomes for all Australians and ensure the sustainability of the Australian health system. This Agreement was entered into on 2 August 2011.
As part of the Agreement, the Department worked collaboratively with the states and territories in 2011-12 to establish the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority (the Pricing Authority) to determine the national efficient price of public hospital services, and the National Health Performance Authority (the Performance Authority) to drive performance improvement through public reporting of the performance of hospitals, Local Hospital Networks and primary health care services.
The Department also worked closely with all states and territories to develop common national legislation to jointly establish the Administrator of the National Health Funding Pool. The Commonwealth’s legislation, the National Health Reform Amendment (Administrator and National Health Funding Body) Act 2012 (which amended the National Health Reform Act 2011), commenced on 25 June 2012. This legislation also established the National Health Funding Body to assist the Administrator in carrying out its statutory functions.
Deliverable: Establish the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority.
2011-12 Reference Point: The Independent Hospital Pricing Authority is established in a timely manner.
Result: Met.
Prior to the legislation establishing the Pricing Authority, an interim Pricing Authority was established as an Executive Agency, under section 65 of the Public Service Act 1999, by the Governor-General in Council on 17 August 2011, with effect from 1 September 2011. Establishing the interim Pricing Authority was required under the Agreement to provide continuity in the transitioning from the interim to the statutory Pricing Authority.
On 1 September 2011, the then Minister for Health and Ageing appointed an Acting Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the interim Pricing Authority with responsibility for the establishment and day-to-day administration of the interim Pricing Authority.
The legislation to establish the Pricing Authority as a permanent statutory authority took effect on 15 December 2011. On 16 December 2011, the Minister for Health appointed an Acting CEO pending appointment of a permanent CEO of the Pricing Authority. The Minister appointed a Chair, Deputy Chair and non-titled members of the Pricing Authority for a period of five years commencing on 1 February 2012.
Deliverable: Establish the National Health Performance Authority.
2011-12 Reference Point: The National Health Performance Authority to be established by 1 July 2011.
Result: Met.
The National Health Reform Agreement, agreed by the Council of Australian Governments in August 2011, revised the 1 July 2011 establishment date contained in the Heads of Agreement – National Health Reform, to require that the National Health Performance Authority be established ‘as soon as possible’. The legislation establishing the Performance Authority took effect on 21 October 2011.
The then Minister for Health and Ageing appointed a Chair and Deputy Chair of the Performance Authority for a period of five years commencing on 1 November 2011. Additionally, five ordinary members of the Performance Authority were appointed for a period of five years commencing on 1 January 2012. On 1 February 2012, the Minister for Health appointed an Acting Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Performance Authority pending the appointment of a permanent CEO. The inaugural substantive CEO took up the position on 1 June 2012.
Deliverable: Distribute health system performance information.
2011-12 Reference Point: Two Hospital Performance Reports to be prepared in 2011-12.
Result: Not applicable.
Responsibility for this deliverable sits with the National Health Performance Authority.
KPI: Establish the Performance and Accountability Framework and the Hospital Performance and Healthy Communities Reports.
2011-12 Reference Point: Obtain agreement with the participating states and territories, through COAG, to the design of the Performance and Accountability Framework and the Reports.
Result: Substantially met.
The Performance and Accountability Framework was agreed out of session by COAG in late 2011. Responsibility for the Hospital Performance and Health Community Reports sits with the National Health Performance Authority.
The National Partnership Agreement on Improving Public Hospital Services (NPA IPHS) commits up to $3.4 billion to states and territories over eight years between 2010 and 2018. These funds will help to improve emergency department treatment times, reduce the length of elective surgery waiting lists and increase subacute care services.
Deliverable: Provide financial contribution to states and territories to support the delivery of initiatives.
2011-12 Reference Point: Payments to states and territories are made in a timely manner.
Result: Met.
Funding of $775m was allocated during 2011-12 to support the delivery of initiatives with 98% of the allocations paid to states and territories on satisfactory reporting of progress.
From 1 January 2012, the National Emergency Access Target (NEAT) was introduced following COAG acceptance of Expert Panel recommendations. The NEAT requires that 90 per cent of patients leave the emergency department within four hours of presentation, either by admission, transfer to another hospital, or discharge. The target is designed to drive the whole-of-hospital changes that are required to improve emergency patients’ access to care. The Department is monitoring state and territory progress towards achievement of the targets. Reward payments will be payable to those states and territories that achieve agreed interim targets.
Elective surgery is surgery that, in the opinion of the treating clinician, is not an emergency and can be delayed for at least 24 hours. Demand for this surgery is increasing in Australia. Improving elective surgery performance is important in helping more patients receive the surgery they need sooner and to improve their quality of life.
As part of the revised NPA IPHS, COAG accepted recommendations from the Expert Panel to implement a new elective surgery target to replace the National Access Guarantee. The National Elective Surgery Target (NEST) is comprised of two complementary parts: the NEST aims to increase the number of patients who receive their elective surgery within clinically recommended times to 100 per cent and, by 2017, to reduce to zero the number of patients who have already waited longer than the clinically recommended time.
KPI: Patients receiving better and more timely care in public hospitals.
2011-12 Reference Point: Implement elective surgery and emergency department targets agreed by COAG on the advice of the Expert Panel.
Result: Not Applicable.
Measurement of the NEAT and NEST commenced on 1 January 2012, with performance assessed on a calendar year basis, so results will not be available until 2013.
KPI: Percentage of elective surgery patients seen within the clinically recommended time.
2011-12 Target: 80% 2011-12 Actual: Unable to be reported. Result: Not applicable.
Measurement of the NEST commenced on 1 January 2012, with performance assessed on a calendar year basis, so results will not be available until 2013.
The NPA IPHS provides for more than 1,300 new subacute beds to be established in hospital and community settings nationally from 2010-11 to 2013-14. These additional subacute beds will ensure patients have better access to the subacute services they need, including rehabilitation, palliative care, psychogeriatric care, subacute mental health care and geriatric evaluation and management, in the most appropriate setting. Improved access to subacute services will assist better integration of care across the acute, primary and aged care sectors and deliver better patient health outcomes, functional capacity and quality of life.
KPI: Additional subacute beds.
2011-12 Target: 331 2011-12 Actual: Unable to be reported. Result: Not applicable.
Data on the number of additional beds in 2011-12 will not be available until November 2012. While there were initial delays in finalising a nationally consistent method for measuring the increase in the number of subacute care beds, all states and territories have now agreed to the method. States and territories are on track to meet or exceed the National Partnership Agreement subacute care bed targets over the life of the Agreement.
KPI: Enhanced provision and improved mix of subacute care services for hospital and out-of-hospital care.
2011-12 Reference Point: States and territories reporting demonstrates enhanced provision and improved mix of services.
Result: Met.
States and territories are on track to achieve agreed growth targets. Many of the services are being provided outside hospitals as most states and territories increase their outpatient and community-based subacute services. States and territories are able to allocate and distribute their funding based on identified needs and gaps in subacute care within their respective jurisdictions.
Deliverable: Implement a new non-admitted outpatient care national data set specification, to enable national reporting of performance.
2011-12 Reference Point: Phase 1 of the non-admitted outpatient care data set specification expected to be endorsed for implementation by the Australian Government and state and territory governments from 1 July 2011.
Result: Not applicable.
Responsibility for this transferred to Independent Hospital Pricing Authority.
KPI: Private hospitals report against a national private hospital establishment data collection.
2011-12 Reference Point: Acceptance by the private hospital sector of new Private Hospital Establishment Data Specifications as a National Minimum Data Set.
Result: Not met.
The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare undertook a study to develop a revised Private Hospital Establishment Collection dataset and sought to trial this in a cross-section of private hospitals. During the study it became clear that there was not strong industry support for substantial changes to the current dataset or collection arrangements, managed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, and the study was terminated.
In 2011-12, the Department funded the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare to develop the MyHospitals website to publish nationally consistent hospital-level performance information. The MyHospitals website is designed to better inform the community about hospitals by making it easier for people to access information about how individual hospitals are performing.
The MyHospitals website provides nationally consistent, hospital-level performance information for public and private hospitals, such as waiting times for emergency department services and elective surgery in public hospitals, as well as information on hospital acquired staphylococcus infections, hand hygiene rates and cancer surgery waiting times data. It also contains useful profile information such as hospital bed numbers, accreditation status, location details with a map, and a list of clinical and specialist services offered.
The website has been well received by the public and media. Since its launch in December 2010 MyHospitals has had more than 835,000 visits.
The National Health Performance Authority (the Performance Authority) will take responsibility for the MyHospitals website during 2012-13 and it will become the online vehicle for reporting on the performance of individual hospitals and Local Hospital Networks.
Local Hospital Networks will directly manage public hospital services and functions to decentralise public hospital management and increase local accountability. Local Hospital Networks will engage with the local community and local clinicians, incorporating their views into the day-to-day operational planning of hospitals, particularly in the areas of safety and quality of patient care.
Deliverable: First group of Local Hospital Networks established.
2011-12 Reference Point: First group of Local Hospital Networks commence operation from July 2011.
Result: Met.
Under the National Health Reform Agreement, states and territories, as health system managers, are responsible for the establishment of Local Hospital Networks (LHNs). During 2011-12, LHNs were established in NSW, Victoria, SA and ACT. Implementation in the remaining jurisdictions took place on 1 July 2012.
KPI: Increase responsiveness to local health needs through Local Hospital Networks.
2011-12 Reference Point: Reports against standards and targets will be provided to the National Hospital Performance Authority.
Result: Substantially met.
All states and territories have established their LHNs by 1 July 2012, as required under the National Health Reform Agreement. The Performance Authority was legislatively established on 21 October 2011, and since late 2011 has been developing core operating documents, including its data plan and strategic plan. The Performance Authority has indicated that it anticipates releasing the first of its Hospital Performance Reports late in the 2012 calendar year.
The National Lead Clinicians Group provides high level leadership, advice and expertise on national clinical issues to the Australian Government. The group seeks to improve and foster clinical best practice and collaborative ways of working across disciplines and sectors.
Deliverable: Establishment of the national and local Lead Clinicians Groups.
2011-12 Reference Point: National and first local Lead Clinician Groups operational from July 2011.
Result: Substantially met.
The National Lead Clinicians Group (LCG) was established on 29 September 2011 and has held three official meetings.
The 2012-13 Budget introduced the Lead Clinicians Groups Streamlined Initiative. This initiative discontinued the establishment of local LCGs and aims to strengthen clinical leadership and engagement at all levels by:
Through the Commonwealth Dental Health Program, the Australian Government intended to provide funding to the state and territory governments for about one million additional public dental visits over three years which was contingent on the closure of the Medicare Chronic Disease Dental Scheme (discussed in Outcome 3 – Access to Medical Services). Since the closure of the Medicare Chronic Disease Dental Scheme did not proceed in 2011-12, the Commonwealth Dental Health Program was not implemented.
KPI: Number of additional public dental visits delivered by the states and territories above agreed baseline. Measured by a reduction in state and territory public dental waiting list for priority groups assisted (commencement date subject to Senate decision).
2011-12 Target: 333,000 2011-12 Actual: 0 Result: Not met.
In the 2012-13 Budget, the $290m allocated for this measure was redirected over the forward estimates towards delivering foundational activities to improve oral health.
In 2011-12, the Department funded mobile dental equipment and infrastructure for rural and regional Indigenous communities. The objective of this program is to provide and assess the effectiveness of mobile dental equipment and services in communities where dental services and facilities are scarce.
Deliverable: Implement the Mobile Indigenous Dental Pilot projects.
2011-12 Reference Point: Mobile Indigenous Dental Pilot projects commence in a timely manner.
Result: Met.
Pilot projects for 2011-12 have been implemented.
The Australian Government provides funding through an agreement with the Tasmanian government for the continuing management and operation of the Mersey Community Hospital at Latrobe, to improve health services for people in the north-west region of Tasmania.
Deliverable: Continued monitoring of the Mersey Community Hospital agreement with Tasmania.
2011-12 Reference Point: Effective oversight of agreement for management and operation of Mersey Community Hospital.
Result: Met.
The Mersey Community Hospital continues to operate in accordance with the agreement between the Australian Government and the Tasmanian government to ensure that people in the north-west region of Tasmania are able to access safe, appropriate and sustainable health care services.
KPI: Core clinical services that are specified in the agreement for the management, operation and funding of the Mersey Community Hospital continue to be provided by the hospital.
2011-12 Reference Point: Analysis of data provided under the agreement demonstrates that the agreed services are being provided.
Result: Met.
Analysis of the data provided to the Department under the Heads of Agreement confirmed that the agreed services were provided.
Deliverable: Produce relevant and timely evidence-based policy research.
2011-12 Reference Point: Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner.
Result: Met.
The Department provided high quality and timely evidence-based research and analysis to inform the Australian Government within the time frames required. Also, under the NPA IPHS states and territories provided satisfactory progress reports to receive 98% of the 2011-12 allocation to increase access to elective surgery and emergency department services as well as increasing subacute care beds.
Deliverable: Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues.
2011-12 Reference Point: Stakeholders participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings.
Result: Met.
The Chair and various members of the National Lead Clinicians Group were invited to present at various meetings, conferences and discussions throughout the year. Presentations were made to a varied range of clinical groups, across national, state and local levels, in many jurisdictions.
Deliverable: Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses.
2011-12 Target: ≤0.5% 2011-12 Actual: -17.5% Result: Not met.
Delays in establishing the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority and the National Health Performance Authority impacted on a number of projects, resulting in an underspend. This will not impact on the Authorities achieving their outcomes.
| (A) Budget Estimate 2011-12 $’000 | (B) Actual 2011-12 $’000 | Variation (Column B minus Column A) $’000 | |
| Program 13.1: Blood and Organ Donation Services | |||
| Administered Expenses | |||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 9,979 | 10,238 | 259 |
| Special appropriations | |||
| National Health Act 1953 – Blood Fractionation, Products and Blood Related Products – to National Blood Authority | 646,003 | 640,251 | ( 5,752) |
| Departmental Expenses | |||
| Departmental Appropriation1 | 3,758 | 3,811 | 53 |
| Expenses not requiring appropriation in the current year2 | 179 | 189 | 10 |
| Total for Program 13.1 | 659,919 | 654,489 | ( 5,430) |
| Program 13.2: Medical Indemnity | |||
| Administered Expenses | |||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 163 | 162 | ( 1) |
| Special appropriations | |||
| Medical Indemnity Act 2002 | 105,800 | 172,426 | 66,626 |
| Midwife Professional Indemnity | |||
| (Commonwealth Contribution) Scheme Act 2010 | 240 | – | ( 240) |
| Departmental Expenses | |||
| Departmental Appropriation1 | 789 | 801 | 12 |
| Expenses not requiring appropriation in the current year2 | 37 | 38 | 1 |
| Total for Program 13.2 | 107,029 | 173,427 | 66,398 |
| Program 13.3: Public Hospitals and Information | |||
| Administered Expenses | |||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 106,017 | 78,433 | ( 27,584) |
| Departmental Expenses | |||
| Departmental Appropriation1 | 54,177 | 53,402 | ( 775) |
| Expenses not requiring appropriation in the current year2 | 1,983 | 2,021 | 38 |
| Total for Program 13.3 | 162,177 | 133,856 | ( 28,321) |
| Outcome 13 Totals by appropriation type | |||
| Administered Expenses | |||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 116,159 | 88,833 | ( 27,326) |
| Special appropriations | 752,043 | 812,677 | 60,634 |
| Departmental Expenses | |||
| Departmental Appropriation1 | 58,724 | 58,014 | ( 710) |
| Expenses not requiring appropriation in the current year2 | 2,199 | 2,248 | 49 |
| Total expenses for Outcome 13 | 929,125 | 961,772 | 32,647 |
| Average Staffing Level (Number) | 290 | 287 | ( 3) |
Produced by the Portfolio Strategies Division, Australian
Government Department of Health and Ageing.
URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/annrpt/publishing.nsf/Content/annual-report-1112-toc~11-12part2~11-12part2.2~11-12outcome13
If you would like to know more or give us your comments contact: annrep@health.gov.au