You are in:
A reduction in the incidence and consequence of hearing loss, including through research and prevention activities, and access to hearing services and devices for eligible people
PDF printable version of Outcome 7 – Hearing Services (PDF 631 KB)
This chapter reports on the major activities undertaken by the department during the year, reporting against each of the major activities and performance indicators published in the Outcome 7 chapter of the 2010-11 Health and Ageing Portfolio Budget Statements (PB Statements) and the 2010-11 Health and Ageing Portfolio Additional Estimates Statements (PAES). It also includes a table summarising the estimated and actual expenditure for this Outcome.
Outcome 7 was managed in 2010-11 by the Regulatory Policy and Governance Division.
| Program Name | Program Objectives in 2010-11 |
|---|---|
| Program 7.1: Hearing Services |
|
Source: Office of Hearing Services database, unpublished.
Clinical services provided under the Voucher Program include hearing assessments, the fitting of hearing devices, or existing hearing aid adjustments. Supplementary services provided under the Voucher Program include repairs or maintenance services or the provision of spare hearing aids. Where a client has received both clinical services and supplementary services in the same year, they have only been counted in clinical services.
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Provide clients with advice on voucher services. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Timely and accurate advice provided to clients. | ||||
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||||
| During 2010-11 the Client Contact Line answered phone calls with an average wait time of 4.3 minutes compared to the 2009-10 average of 8.7 minutes. The Client Applications Team processed applications for a hearing service voucher within an average of 11.5 days of receipt of a correctly completed application (service benchmark of 14 working days). This was down from the 2009-10 average of 17.7 working days. | |||||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Provide appropriate services to eligible clients with special needs. | ||||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Delivery of quality services to clients with special needs in a timely manner. | ||||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||||
| In 2010-11 the department continued funding Australian Hearing (the government service delivery agency) to deliver services to eligible clients with special needs, including children, Indigenous adults and adults with complex needs. These services were provided within agreed standards and timeframes as set out in the Memorandum of Understanding between the department and Australian Hearing. | |||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of sites registered to provide services under the Hearing Services Program. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 2,100 | 2010-11 Actual: | 2,230 | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||||
| In 2010-11 there were 2,230 sites registered under the Australian Government Hearing Services Program. This compares with 2,131 sites in 2009-10 and 2,037 in 2008-09. | |||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of people receiving hearing services. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 596,706 | 2010-11 Actual: | 599,581 | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||||
| In 2010-11 there were 599,581 people who received hearing services. | |||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Average number of working days taken to issue vouchers to eligible clients. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 14 | 2010-11 Actual: | 11.5 | ||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||||
| The average number of working days for hearing service voucher application forms to be processed in 2010-11 was 11.5. This was down from 17.7 in 2009-10. | |||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Maintain or increase the percentage of fitted clients who use their device(s) for five or more hours per day. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 56% | 2010-11 Actual: | Not applicable | ||
| Result: Not applicable. | |||||
| The data for this KPI is unavailable as the department did not conduct the annual client survey during 2010-11 as staffing resources were redirected to core client activities including voucher application processing and call centre operations. | |||||
| Qualitative KPI: | Hearing service providers operate in accordance with their contractual and legislative obligations. | ||||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Investigation of issues raised by clients and appropriate remedial action by clinical support staff demonstrates that providers meet their requirements. | ||||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||||
| Audited outcomes found that the majority of hearing service providers operate in accordance with their contractual and legislative obligations. Remedial action taken on exceptions resulted in establishing compliance by providers. | |||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Number of applications received per year. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 337,370 | 2010-11 Actual: | 330,166 |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||
| The Hearing Services Program received 330,166 hearing service voucher applications during 2010-11. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of clients accessing rehabilitation services. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 4,540 | 2010-11 Actual: | 2,508 |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| Since the commencement of Rehabilitation Plus in 2008, the rate of clients claiming under Rehabilitation Plus is at a consistent rate with: 3.79% in 2008-09, 5.5% in 2009-10 and 4.5% in 2010-11. A review of the program, to identify barriers and enablers to the service, was undertaken in May-June 2011, for policy consideration early in 2011-12. | |||
| Qualitative KPI: | Provision of hearing devices targeted to clinical need. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Qualified practitioners operate within the legislated exemption criteria. | ||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| Monitoring of the impact of the threshold has indicated that it is achieving its aim of better targeting services. The average percentage of device fittings to new clients with a hearing loss below the threshold reduced from 8% in 2009-10 to 3.7% in 2010-11, indicating the MHLT is having the desired impact on better targeting of hearing device provision to those with the greatest clinical need. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of clients fitted with a hearing device with hearing loss greater than 23 decibels. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 95% | 2010-11 Actual: | 95.6% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| In 2010-11 there were 140,841 clients fitted with a device, of these, 134,676 clients were with a hearing loss greater than 23 decibels. This is 95.6% of all clients fitted. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Existing research and prevention projects are completed in the required timeframes and the results are disseminated widely. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 100% | 2010-11 Actual: | 67% |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||
| Two of the three research and prevention projects that were planned to be finalised in 2010-11 were completed by the due date. Work on the remaining project has been of a high standard with the delay caused by competing priorities of a collaborator to the researcher. This remaining project is expected to be finalised by the end of 2011. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Progress reports submitted from existing grant recipients as per agreement. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 100% | 2010-11 Actual: | 100% |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| All fifteen progress reports that were due during 2010-11 were provided at the standard required. | |||
| Qualitative KPI | Ensure research findings are published in accordance with contract requirements. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Contract requirements of publishing are met. | ||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| All hearing loss prevention projects were published and disseminated information in accordance with their contract requirements. In addition, two completed projects and a number of current projects exceeded their contracted requirements in terms of report dissemination requirements. Dissemination actions included conference presentations, published research papers in peer reviewed journals, formal publications and on the internet. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Produce relevant and timely evidence‑based policy research. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Relevant evidence‑based policy research produced in a timely manner. | ||
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| Three projects funded from the Hearing Loss Prevention Program produced significant research reports in 2010-11. Two of the three projects were completed when due in 2010-11 and will significantly improve the knowledge base on preventable hearing loss in respect of the source and impact of noise exposure in young adults. The otitis media clinical care guidelines were updated to ensure that treatment options are based on the most current research available. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholders participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings. | ||
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| In 2010-11, the department consulted with clients, the hearing services industry, hearing services professional bodies, consumer representative organisations, Australian Hearing and other Government departments in relation to a variety of hearing services matters including the Government’s response to the Senate Inquiry into Hearing Health in Australia and practitioner registration matters. This consultation was conducted through face to face meetings, electronic bulletins and invitations for submissions/feedback. The department did not conduct a client survey or convene a meeting of a ministerial advisory committee, due to a decrease in the Office’s departmental budget and resources being redirected to direct client functions due to increased client demand. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2010-11 Actual: | -4.52% |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| In 2010-11, the actual administered expenses were $358,138,000, which was 4.52% lower than budgeted. The Hearing Services Program is a demand driven program and the expected growth rate of clients in 2010-11 was based on the pattern of the growth in the 4th quarters of 2008-09 and 2009-10. However, the growth did not follow the same trajectory as previous years. Less people applied in 2010-11 than the previous year, and of those who did apply a lower percentage were eligible than the previous year; possibly due to recovery for the global financial crisis. | |||
(A) Budget Estimate1 2010-11 $’000 | (B) Actual 2010-11 $’000 | Variation (Column B minus Column A) $’000 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Program 7.1: Hearing Services | |||
| |||
| 375,098 | 358,137 | (16,961) |
| |||
| 9,321 | 9,234 | (87) |
| 163 | 143 | (20) |
| 212 | 263 | 51 |
| - | 1 | 1 |
| Total for Program 7.1 | 384,794 | 367,778 | (17,016) |
| Outcome 7 Totals by appropriation type | |||
| |||
| 375,098 | 358,137 | (16,961) |
| |||
| 9,321 | 9,234 | (87) |
| 163 | 143 | (20) |
| 212 | 263 | 51 |
| - | 1 | 1 |
| Total expenses for Outcome 7 | 384,794 | 367,778 | (17,016) |
| Average Staffing Level (Number) | 64 | 64 | 0 |
1 Budgeted appropriations taken from the 2011-12 Health and Ageing Portfolio Budget Statements and re-aligned to the 2010-11 outcome structure. | |||
80 Finalised Hearing Loss Prevention Program reports are available at: www.health.gov.au/hear
When accessing large documents (over 500 KB in size), it is recommended that the following procedure be used:
Attempting to open large documents within the browser window (by left-clicking)
may inhibit your ability to continue browsing while the document is
opening and/or lead to system problems.
To view PDF (Portable Document Format) documents, you will need to have a PDF reader installed on your computer. A number of PDF readers are available through the Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) Web Guide website.
Produced by the Portfolio Strategies Division, Australian
Government Department of Health and Ageing.
URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/annrpt/publishing.nsf/Content/annual-report-1011-toc~1011part2~1011part2.4~1011outcome7
If you would like to know more or give us your comments contact: annrep@health.gov.au