You are in:
Access to quality and affordable aged care and carer support services for older people, including through subsidies and grants, industry assistance, training and regulation of the aged care sector
PDF printable version of Outcome 4 – Aged Care and Population Ageing (PDF 1282 KB)
This chapter reports on the major activities undertaken by the department during the year, reporting against each of the major activities and performance indicators published in the Outcome 4 chapter of the 2010-11 Health and Ageing Portfolio Budget Statements (PB Statements) and the 2010-11 Health and Ageing Portfolio Additional Estimates Statements (PAES). It also includes a table summarising the estimated and actual expenditure for this Outcome.
Outcome 4 was managed in 2010-11 by the Ageing and Aged Care Division and the Office of Aged Care Quality and Compliance. The department’s state and territory offices and the Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd, which produces its own annual report, also contributed to the achievement of this Outcome.
| Program Name | Program Objectives in 2010-11 |
|---|---|
| Program 4.1: Aged Care Assessment |
|
| Program 4.2: Aged Care Workforce |
|
| Program 4.3: Ageing Information and Support |
|
| Program 4.4: Community Care |
|
| Program 4.5: Culturally Appropriate Aged Care |
|
| Program 4.6: Dementia |
|
| Program 4.7: Flexible Aged Care |
|
| Program 4.8: Residential Care |
|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of completed assessments undertaken on clients in the target population. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 86% | 2010-11 Actual: | Data available December 2011 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2010-11, projected figures based on the 1 July to 31 December 2010 data indicate that 92.6% of all completed assessments undertaken by ACATs were for the target population. The Australian Capital Territory had the highest proportion of assessments from the target population with 93.7%, while the Northern Territory had the lowest with 85.5%. All states and territories are projected to meet the 2010-11 target of 86%. | |||
| Qualitative KPI: | Each state and territory provides a Narrative Report on the program deliverables. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | The Narrative Report, provided in a timely manner, outlines program achievements and identifies barriers to delivery. | ||
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||
| A Narrative Report on the achievement of the objective for the Aged Care Assessment Program for the period of 2009-10 was provided by all states and territories except New South Wales. The department continues to liaise with New South Wales regarding the report. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of high priority assessments completed within 48 hours of referral. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 85% | 2010-11 Actual: | Data available December 2011 |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||
| In 2009-10, 83.0% of the highest priority assessments were seen within 48 hours of referral. The target of 85% was met by Victoria (91.8%), Queensland (85.5%), Western Australia (91.1%), the Northern Territory (90.3%) and the Australian Capital Territory (96.1%). The target was not met by New South Wales (84.3%), South Australia (72.8%) and Tasmania (66.7%). | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Maintain national training resources for Aged Care Assessment Team members to ensure quality assessments of the care needs of frail older people. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Aged Care Assessment Program National Orientation Training Resources and National Delegation Training Resources are updated to ensure they are consistent with the changes to the Aged Care Act 1997, with a focus on people with special needs. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department updated the Aged Care Assessment Program National Orientation Training Resources and National Delegation Training Resources to ensure they are consistent with the changes to the Aged Care Act 1997. Additional information was also provided to ACAT Education Officers at an education workshop in November 2010 about the care leavers special needs group. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of delegates who have successfully completed the knowledge assessment component of the delegation training. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 100% | 2010-11 Actual: | 95.57% |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| The department requires all ACAT members to complete training in 2010-11 as described in the Aged Care Assessment Program National Training Strategy, which is a key performance indicator of the Aged Care Assessment Program Implementation Plan. Recognition was obtained for the National Aged Care Assessment Program Training Resources for continuing professional education credit from the following peak professional bodies for four of the core ACAT professions: the Royal College of Nursing Australia; the Australian Physiotherapy Association; Occupational Therapy Australia; and the Australian Association of Social Workers. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Produce relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department established an expert clinical reference group to develop a set of validated, specific assessment tools and develop criteria for use by ACATs. This group used evidence-based research to identify assessment tools appropriate for use by assessors in the comprehensive assessment of frail, older people. The report Selecting Tools for ACAT Assessment: A Report for the Expert Clinical Reference Group, Aged Care Assessment Program, Department of Health and Ageing37 released in September 2010, recommended core assessment tools for cognitive and physical domains to be used in every assessment. The report guided the establishment of the ACAT Toolkit. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholders participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2010-11, the department worked with Aged Care Assessment Program Officials and Aged and Community Care Officials to improve the timeliness, consistency and quality of assessments conducted by ACATs. Additionally, the department worked with the National Aged Care Assessment Team Training Reference group to revise and update national training resources. The reference group also assisted with the two-day ACAT Education Officer workshops held in November 2010 and May 2011. These workshops provided the opportunity for networking and information sharing and to receive additional training in workplace coaching and e-learning. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2010-11 Actual: | -14.4% |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| The department did not achieve the performance target for actual administered expenses. This is attributable to the delayed implementation of planned National Aged Care Assessment Program Training Strategy activities. These activities are now scheduled for the 2011-12 financial year. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Ensure the aged care workforce is adequately skilled to meet the demands of the aged care sector. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Provision of timely and relevant training. | |||
| Result: Deliverable met. | ||||
| The department set the training priorities for workforce training programs in consultation with the Aged Care Workforce Committee. Registered Training Organisations delivering the programs were selected based on their ability to work with the sector and to deliver high quality, relevant training. A total of 88 organisations were funded to deliver training in 2010-11. Training organisations work with students and aged care providers to ensure that students are able to demonstrate the relevant competencies as they pursue accredited certificate and diploma qualifications. | ||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of incentive payments made. | |||
| 2010-11 Target: | 14,400 | 2010-11 Actual: | 5,265 | |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | ||||
| Eligibility for the incentive payments commenced on 1 July 2010 and guidelines for the program were developed in consultation with the Aged Care Workforce Committee. A registration page on the department’s website, where applicants could register their interest in the program, was made available on 5 July 2010. Payment arrangements were finalised and application forms were made publicly available in November 2010 with payments commencing in December 2010. The department continues to promote the program to workers and to providers. | ||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of incentive payments taken up. | |||
| 2010-11 Target: | 100% | 2010-11 Actual: | 100% | |
| Result: Indicator met. | ||||
| While applications for incentive payments were initially lower than expected, 100% of eligible applicants received payments. | ||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of training places funded for aged care workers. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 7,200 | 2010-11 Actual: | 19,199 | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||||
| Contracts are in place to deliver training to meet specified targets across 2010-11 and 2011-12. The department funded 88 Registered Training Organisations to deliver training for 1,471 aged care workers leading to a qualification as an enrolled nurse as well as 9,289 certificate training places and 8,439 short courses across Australia over two years. | |||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of scholarships funded for aged care nurses. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 715 | 2010-11 Actual: | 715 | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||||
| Demand for scholarships remained high in 2010-11. Of 2,089 eligible applications received, the department offered 715 aged care nursing scholarships comprising 395 undergraduate, 310 postgraduate and 10 nurse practitioner scholarships. | |||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of clinical and graduate placements. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 180 | 2010-11 Actual: | 0 | ||
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||||
| Contracts are in place with 13 providers and one state-based aged care peak body to deliver 1,300 undergraduate clinical and graduate places for nurses in aged care over three years starting in 2011-12. Although no places were delivered in 2010-11, program design and implementation plans have been completed and it is expected that the total number of places delivered over the life of the program will exceed the original target. | |||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of aged care worker training places taken up. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 100% | 2010-11 Actual: | 100% | ||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||||
| All training places were taken up, with 65% of the certificate training places allocated to residential aged care services and 35% allocated to personal care workers employed in community aged services. | |||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of aged care nursing scholarships taken up. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 100% | 2010-11 Actual: | 100% | ||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||||
| Demand for scholarships remains high. A reserve list of applicants is maintained in case any students withdraw before the semester begins. | |||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of clinical and graduate placements taken up. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 100% | 2010-11 Actual: | Not applicable | ||
| Result: Not applicable. | |||||
| Contracts are now in place with 13 providers and one state-based aged care peak body to deliver 1,300 placements over three years starting in 2011-12. Although no places were delivered in 2010-11, program design and implementation plans have been completed and it is expected that the total number of places delivered over the life of the program will exceed the original targets. | |||||
| Qualitative KPI: | Regular stakeholder participation in program development, through avenues such as surveys, conferences, meetings and submissions on departmental discussion papers. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | The department collaborates with and supports the Aged Care Workforce Committee. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The department consulted the Aged Care Workforce Committee on the development and implementation of several initiatives under the Supporting a Professional Aged Care Workforce Program, the Nurse Practitioner – Aged Care Models of Practice Program, and the Aged Care Education and Training Incentive Program. The Committee met in October 2010 and March 2011 and also considered a number of issues out-of-session. | |
In 2010-11, the department funded development work around researching staffing levels and skills mix in Australian aged care facilities.
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Produce relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department completed eight projects as part of the Encouraging Better Practice in Aged Care initiative. These projects promoted the implementation of evidence-based practice and generated new research. The department also completed the National Evaluation of the Encouraging Better Practice in Aged Care initiative which will contribute to the development of future policy. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2010-11 Actual: | -10.6% |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| The department did not achieve the performance target for actual administered expenses. This is attributable to lower than expected take-up of the Aged Care Education and Training Incentive Program, and delays in the provision of deliverables by registered training organisations. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Produce relevant information resources to support older Australians and their carers. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Relevant information resources developed in a timely manner. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department produced a range of information resources to assist carers to access information about aged care, support services or respite. These resources included brochures, emergency care plans and fact sheets. | |
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Establish one stop shops. | |
|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Sector consulted in development of access and assessment model to be utilised for one stop shops. | |
| Result: Deliverable met. | ||
| The department consulted with more than 1,000 stakeholders to inform the early development of the proposed model. In addition, more than 500 people participated in an online survey conducted in December 2010 and January 2011. | ||
| Qualitative KPI: | Stakeholders to participate in program development. | |
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Opportunity for stakeholders to participate through a range of avenues including through meetings, feedback, focus groups, committees and conferences. | |
| Result: Indicator met. | ||
| In 2010-11, the department engaged with more than 1,500 stakeholders to inform the early development of the new front end for aged care, including through formal consultations and an online survey. The department also hosted two consultation forums about the role of the Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centres into the future which were attended by representatives from all centres. The department sought input to, and feedback, on the proposed implementation of the new front end for aged care through meetings with consumer and provider peak organisations, and through presentations at sector events, including the Home and Community Care National Conference held in April 2011. | ||
As part of the first step to improving access to the front end of aged care, the Government has established a new national telephone number (1800 200 422) which is linked to the Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centre network. The department supported the Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centre network of 54 centres across Australia to provide information and access for older Australians and their carers to a range of community, aged care and support services. Centres also help carers identify what supports may be available locally and to use established local networks to provide options to take a break.
The department also improved the Aged Care Australia website40 providing more comprehensive information for the growing number of people who like to find their information online. The information technology market was approached through an expression of interest process to test the market’s ability and interest in providing an information technology spine capable of supporting a new front end for aged care. Further changes and improvements to ensure a nationally consistent aged care system that is easier to access and navigate will be considered as part of the Government’s response to the Productivity Commission Inquiry Caring for Older Australians.
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of calls made to the Aged Care Information Line. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 109,200 | 2010-11 Actual: | 100,925 | |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | ||||
| Calls to the Aged Care Information Line41 vary from time to time and tend to increase when pension rates and residential fees and charges change, and following major funding announcements, such as the Aged Care Approval Round. | ||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Average number of searches per month on the Aged Care Australia website. | |||
| 2010-11 Target: | 16,700 searches | 2010-11 Actual: | 10,988 searches | |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | ||||
| The Aged Care Australia website has online search facilities that enable people to look for Australian Government subsidised aged care services to meet their needs. The target is an estimate of the number of possible searches per month. Recently announced improvements to the Aged Care Australia website may lead to an increase in its use. | ||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage increase in the number of calls received by the Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centres annually. | |||
| 2010-11 Target: | 5% | 2010-11 Actual: | 12% | |
| Result: Indicator met. | ||||
| The number of successful calls to Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centres was 295,980 in 2009-10. The successful calls in 2010-11 totalled 331,807 which is a 12% increase. | ||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of carer information resources distributed, including Carer Information Fact Sheets and Emergency Care Kits. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 282,000 | 2010-11 Actual: | 301,526 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2010-11 the department distributed a total of 301,526 information resources. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centres client episodes. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 205,000 | 2010-11 Actual: | 291,611 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The number of client episodes represents the number of times that carers were assisted by a Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centre. It includes telephone calls, emails, facsimiles and visits to a centre. A carer may have been helped more than once in this period. The increase in contacts in 2010-11 is due to a review of data collection processes by Centres, which has resulted in more accurate number of client episodes being recorded. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of searches on the Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centre website. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 256,000 | 2010-11 Actual: | 147,360 |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| Numbers of searches on the Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centre website can fluctuate for various reasons, including the level of promotional activity undertaken by the centres. The overall level of information provided to carers has been maintained through items distributed under the carer information and support program which totalled 374,695 in 2010-11. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Provide stakeholders with easy access to the services under the Aged Care Complaints Investigation Scheme. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholders can access the Aged Care Complaints Investigation Scheme43 through a number of mechanisms, including a freecall telephone service and the internet. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| Complainants and approved providers were able to contact the Scheme seven days a week online44, through a toll-free number45 and in writing.46 Anyone with concerns can access the Scheme, including care recipients, advocates, representatives, health professionals, aged care staff, family members, friends and community visitors. Information about the Scheme is available through the Scheme’s blog, the department’s website47, the national health reform website48, the Aged Care Australia website49 and through printed publications in 16 languages other than English. Interpreter services are also available free of charge. | |
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Effective and timely communication to all relevant stakeholders on the progress and outcomes of complaints. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholders receive clear communication from the Aged Care Complaints Investigation Scheme on the progress and outcomes of complaints investigations. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department improved the consistency, timeliness and quality of communications and decisions throughout the complaints process. Strengthened processes were introduced to ensure issues being examined are identified and confirmed in writing to both parties as early as possible in the process. Parties were regularly consulted throughout the process and had opportunities to provide further information. Staff were trained in providing clearer feedback to all parties when complaints are finalised. | |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Proportion of cases finalised within 40 days of receipt by the Aged Care Complaints Investigation Scheme. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 50% | 2010-11 Actual: | 67% |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department finalised 8,870 in-scope cases in 2010-11, with 5,970 cases (67.3%) resolved within 40 days of receipt. In addition, the number of cases open for 180 days or longer has reduced from 93 cases to four as of 30 June 2011. | |||
| Qualitative KPI: | Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the Aged Care Complaints Investigation Scheme through ongoing development and review of its processes. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Complaints Investigation Scheme processes are reviewed and continually developed to improve its efficiency and effectiveness. | ||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| In 2010-11, the department commenced implementation of a four year reform program to improve the operation of the Scheme in response to an independent review. The department revised procedures and processes to resolve complaints more quickly, to communicate better with all parties throughout the process and to improve access to independent review. This resulted in a reduction of long wait cases from 93 to four at 30 June 2011. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of clients satisfied with the effectiveness of the Complaints Investigation Scheme. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 75% | 2010-11 Actual: | 83% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| The department finalised 8,870 in-scope contacts and distributed more than 17,700 satisfaction surveys to complainants, aged care homes and the providers of those services. Feedback showed that 83% of customers who completed the survey were either very satisfied or satisfied with the overall way the Scheme handled the complaint. The department is implementing a four year reform program that will continue to strengthen the Scheme’s operations, with a focus on achieving timely resolution of concerns. | |||
In February 2011, the department released a discussion paper on the proposed complaints management framework, a major component of the reforms to the Scheme. The framework expands the options available to resolve concerns, it encourages complainants to resolve concerns with approved providers in the first instance, if appropriate, and it assesses each complaint’s level of risk to ensure it is managed and escalated appropriately. Forty one submissions were received from a range of stakeholders, including approved providers, consumer advocacy services, unions and peak industry bodies and the Aged Care Commissioner. Legislation supporting the new complaint management framework is expected to take effect on
1 September 2011.
Consumers can contact the Scheme in the following ways:
| Quantitative Deliverable: | All relevant information on compliance action taken by the department is published on website in a timely manner. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 100% | 2010-11 Actual: | 100% |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The website is updated every week with the latest information on compliance action taken by the department. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of clients satisfied with the services delivered under the National Aged Care Advocacy Program. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 80% | 2010-11 Actual: | 98% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| Clients have consistently reported very high levels of satisfaction with the services delivered under the National Aged Care Advocacy Program. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Community Visitors Scheme recruits volunteers in a timely manner. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Community-based organisations meet targets for volunteer recruitment. | |||
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | ||||
| The department supports 156 organisations to recruit volunteers for the Scheme. To be considered an ‘active visitor’, volunteers must make 20 visits in a year. While this is a challenging target for volunteers to achieve, volunteers completed more than 178,000 visits in 2010-11. | ||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of Community Visitor Scheme volunteers recruited to run the Scheme. | |||
| 2010-11 Target: | 7,500 | 2010-11 Actual: | More than 6,600 | |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | ||||
| The department supports 156 organisations to recruit volunteers for the Scheme. Changes to the nature of volunteering, and to the demographics of volunteers, meant that some volunteers were not able to meet the threshold number of 20 visits to be considered an “active visitor”. Nevertheless, volunteers completed more than 178,000 visits in 2010-11. | ||||
| Qualitative KPI: | Twelve month activity reports comply with funding requirements. | |||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Program is delivered according to funding guidelines. | |||
| Result: Cannot be reported. | ||||
| The required data will not be available until 1 November 2011. | ||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of allocated visits achieved by the Community Visitors Scheme. | |||
| 2010-11 Target: | 100% | 2010-11 Actual: | 100% | |
| Result: Indicator met. | ||||
| Despite changes in the nature of volunteering which have made it difficult for organisations to recruit sufficient volunteers, the volunteers that were recruited made more than 178,000 visits. | ||||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Produce relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| Reforms to the Complaints Investigation Scheme were developed after consulting with Australian complaints bodies and stakeholders, examining the International Standard for Complaints and analysing cases to identify opportunities where outcomes could be improved through strengthened resolution approaches. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholders participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department provided several avenues to allow stakeholders to properly participate in program development. Stakeholders participated by: providing submissions on the draft complaint management framework; providing feedback on the draft Complaints Principles, a revised service charter and consumer information materials; and being involved in a reference group to review materials, strategies and frameworks. The department also established a blog to foster ongoing consultation and communication with stakeholders and the community. In total, the department held 32 meetings with stakeholders, presented at four industry conferences, attended eight industry events, provided two reform updates by email and placed two articles in peak body newsletters. The department engaged with over 1,000 people through consultations on the new front end for aged care around Australia, and more than 500 participated in an online survey on the aged care reforms. Feedback was provided on a discussion paper proposing the elements and functions for the new front end and informed policy development. Stakeholders included local and state and territory governments, non-government organisations, service providers, workforce and peak bodies. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2010-11 Actual: | -5.0% |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| Funds were provided to support the development and implementation of the 2010-11 Budget measure, Aged Care, Reforms of Roles and Responsibilities – Home and Community Care and related programs. The department identified a more cost effective way to support the measure than was anticipated, resulting in the funds for 2010-11 not being fully expensed. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Negotiate National Partnership (NP) Agreements with state and territory governments which will take effect from 1 July 2011. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Funding agreements in place with state and territory governments by 1 July 2011. | ||
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| The National Partnership Agreements are in the final stages of negotiations. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of Home and Community Care services provided to eligible clients in the community. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 2.1m | 2010-11 Actual: | 2.4m |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2010-11, the department provided 2.4 million HACC services to eligible clients in the community. | |||
| Qualitative KPI: | Seamless transition between funding arrangements for Home and Community Care Program. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | During transition period, Home and Community Care Program clients continue to receive appropriate services. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The department has undertaken a number of consultations with state and territory governments and service providers in participating states and territories to ensure that they understand the proposed reforms, and that care recipients will continue to receive services from their current providers while administration and funding arrangements change. | |
Throughout 2010-11, the department developed a number of fact sheets about the reforms and answers to frequently asked questions published on the website.52
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Enhancements to quality review processes implemented in consultation with stakeholders. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholder consultations will take place through the Ageing Consultative Committee and other stakeholder groups. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department implemented the Community Care Common Standards and reporting processes in consultation with the Ageing Consultative Committee and stakeholders. More than 3,500 community care service provider representatives attended a total of approximately 70 presentations which were conducted nationally. | |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Estimated number of Community Aged Care Packages allocated. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 45,013 | 2010-11 Actual: | 45,179 | |
| Result: Deliverable met. | ||||
| In 2010-11, the department allocated 2,408 Community Aged Care Packages from the results of the 2009-10 Aged Care Approval Round. This included an additional 826 packages in New South Wales, Queensland, Western Australia, Tasmania, Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory due to a lower number of residential places being allocated in those jurisdictions. These allocations bring the total allocated number of community aged care packages to 45,179. | ||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage increase in the number of eligible care recipients provided with Community Aged Care Packages. | |||
| 2010-11 Target: | 2.9% | 2010-11 Actual: | 5.5% | |
| Result: Indicator met. | ||||
| The number of care recipients receiving a community care package at 30 June 2011 was 45,096. | ||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of community aged care services visited as part of quality assurance processes. | |||
| 2010-11 Target: | >33% | 2010-11 Actual: | 34% | |
| Result: Indicator met. | ||||
| In 2010-11, 34% of community aged care services completed quality reviews. | ||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of respite services provided to eligible clients in the community. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 84,000 | 2010-11 Actual: | 130,477 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2010-11, more than 130,000 carers received assistance through the National Respite for Carers Program. This figure includes 31,862 carers assisted with respite; 93,341 carers assisted to receive information, support and emergency respite through Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centres and 5,274 carers who received counselling services. Respite services funded under the National Respite for Carers Program provided more than five million hours of respite in 2010-11. The total number of carers assisted through the National Respite for Carers Program is an estimate. This estimate is based on data taken from 1 July 2010 to 31 March 2011 and extrapolated to cover the period to 30 June 2011. Final figures will be publicly available on the department’s website.54 | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage increase in carers referred to the National Carer Counselling Program by Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centres. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 3% | 2010-11 Actual: | -20% |
| Result: Indicator not met. | |||
| Referrals from the Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centres to the National Carer Counselling Program have reduced from 854 in 2009-10 to 680 in 2010-11 and this decrease in referrals is partly due to carers self-referring. | |||
The four year Demonstration Day Respite (DDR) pilot was implemented in 2007 to trial innovative respite options for day respite in aged care homes. In 2010-11, an evaluation of the DDR pilot concluded that the pilot had been effective in providing more respite options for carers and had broadened the range of services offered. The evaluation also found that the services were delivered at a higher than expected cost. Funding for the pilot has been extended for 12 months until 30 June 2012. The executive summary of the evaluation report is available on the website.55
In response to the House of Representatives Standing Committee report: Who Cares…? Report on the inquiry into better support for carers April 2009, the Government agreed to develop a National Carer Recognition Framework comprising national carer recognition legislation and a national carer strategy. The first element was the Carer Recognition Act 2010, which received royal assent on 18 November 2010. The National Carer Strategy (Strategy) is the second element of the framework. The Strategy, which has been jointly developed by this department and the Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, was launched by the Minister for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs and the Minister for Health and Ageing on 3 August 2011.
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Transition of Continence Aids Assistance Scheme clients to the Continence Aids Payment Scheme. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Existing Continence Aids Assistance Scheme clients transferred to the new Continence Aids Payment Scheme by 1 July 2010. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| During 2010-11, the department undertook a range of activities to assist people to transfer from the previous arrangements to the Continence Aids Payment Scheme. There are approximately 86,000 people receiving payments through the Scheme, including approximately 67,000 who previously received services through the Continence Aids Assistance Scheme. | |
| Carers | 6,987 |
| Consumers | 10,240 |
| Health professionals | 6,986 |
| Unknown origin | 1,669 |
| TOTAL | 25,882 |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Provision of information and support through the National Continence Helpline. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 21,000 | 2010-11 Actual: | 25,882 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| This increase in communication with the NCHL is the result of the introduction of the Bladder Bowel Collaborative (BBC) project, under the new National Continence Program, which commenced in January 2011. The BBC project, run by the CFA, is supported by the department and is responsible for the management of the NCHL.
Under the BBC project, the NCHL has seen a number of changes including a significant increase in calls relating to toilet training and constipation in children. This is the result of expanded awareness raising campaigns focused on preventive health messages. The NCHL has consistently received an increase in the volume of calls each year. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage increase in community access to the National Continence Helpline. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 5% | 2010-11 Actual: | 0.5% |
| Result: Indicator not met. | |||
| The total numbers of calls received in 2010-11 were 25,882. The target set for call numbers in 2010-11 has been achieved, exceeding the target by 23%. However, when comparing the total number of calls from 2009-10 to 2010-11, the percentage increase is 0.5%. This is due to there being an abnormally high number of calls received by the Helpline in 2009-10 as a result of the transition from Continence Aids Assistance Schemes to Continence Aids Payment Scheme. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Total number of paid positions for aged care Indigenous workers through the National Partnership Agreement for Indigenous Economic Participation. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | ≥600 | 2010-11 Actual: | 758 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander workers have been employed in all jurisdictions. These initiatives have led to a significant increase to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander workforce in the aged care sector. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of positions filled through the National Partnership Agreement for Indigenous Economic Participation. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | ≥65% | 2010-11 Actual: | 93% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| The high take up of positions in this program reflects the ongoing demand for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander workers in aged care services. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Improved, more adaptive and appropriate assessment and access strategies. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Incorporation of care leavers into assessment and access strategies. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department identified care leavers as a special needs group under aged care legislation on 1 December 2009. The identification of care leavers as a special needs group under the Allocations Principles 1997 means that the special needs of this group are taken into account in the planning and allocation of aged care places. Organisations that apply for aged care funding are now required to demonstrate how they will tailor their service delivery to meet the particular care needs of care leavers and facilitate provision of appropriate care. | |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of Australian Government aged care services that have been supplied with a National Education Package for care leavers. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 4,040 | 2010-11 Actual: | Nil |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| The development of the National Education Package has taken longer than anticipated to allow appropriate consultations with all groups involved including care leavers, Forgotten Australians, former child migrants and people from the Stolen Generations. The Education Package is on track to be completed by the end of 2011. | |||
| Qualitative KPI: | Increased awareness of care leavers among service providers. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Develop a National Educational Package for care leavers. | ||
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||
| Through the Improving Aged Care for Forgotten Australians project, a National Education Package is being developed for service providers in the aged care sector. The package is being prepared in close consultation with Forgotten Australians, service providers and other key stakeholders. It has been scoped and is in the design phase. It will include specific educational material to help the aged care sector better identify and meet the needs of Forgotten Australians. To commence awareness of care leavers among service providers the department has made several presentations to aged care service providers and Aged Care Assessment Teams, informing them about the development of the package and the project aims. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of Australian Government aged care services that have access (either through publication or the internet) to the National Education Package for care leavers. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 100% | 2010-11 Actual: | Nil |
| Result: Indicator not met. | |||
| Through the Improving Aged Care for Forgotten Australians project, a National Education Package is being developed for service providers in the aged care sector. The package is being prepared in close consultation with Forgotten Australians, service providers and other key stakeholders, and is anticipated that it will be completed by the end of 2011. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Producing relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The Community Care Census 2008 was published and released in 2010. This census provides comprehensive analysis and reporting of various groups receiving aged care in the community. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholders participated in program development through such avenues as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| Aged care stakeholders have been actively involved in aged care reform via comprehensive consultative processes, particularly: the implementation of strengthened arrangements for complaints and consumer protection for accommodation bonds; aged care one-stop shops; and the reform of roles and responsibilities for the HACC Program and related programs. Such processes have included opportunities to comment via issues and consultation papers, face-to-face meetings, forums and ongoing discussions.
The Ageing Consultative Committee continues to play an important role in program development and aged care reform. The Committee met four times during 2010-11 to work through and provide input into proposed initiatives. Its membership is comprised of aged care providers, consumers, professional bodies and government representatives. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2010-11 Actual: | -2.9% |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| The department did not achieve the performance target for actual administered expenses. This is attributable to a later than anticipated announcement of results for the 2009-10 Aged Care Approvals Round. This resulted in community care places being made operational later in the financial year than expected. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Grants provided to Partners In Culturally Appropriate Care and organisations representing culturally and linguistically diverse communities to provide information on aged care services. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Timely allocation and expenditure of capital funding. | ||||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||||
| The department funded eight organisations under the Partners in Culturally Appropriate Care Program and 75 projects under the Community Partners Program. | |||||
| Qualitative KPI: | The Partners in Culturally Appropriate Care Program is facilitating the provision of culturally appropriate care. | ||||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Progress reports, and appropriate follow up action by the department, find that relevant and useful products and services are being developed and delivered to service providers, which has resulted in those providers being better equipped to deliver culturally appropriate care. | ||||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||||
| Staff in residential aged care homes who have received training are provided with the necessary skills to deliver culturally appropriate care to older people, including a range of translated resources and materials which assists in the day to day management and interaction between staff and residents. | |||||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Provision of funding for access to translation services for culturally and linguistically diverse older people in aged care. | ||||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Allocation of funding and access to services are delivered in a timely manner. | ||||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||||
| A Memorandum of Understanding has been signed with the Department of Immigration and Citizenship’s Translating and Interpreting Service for providers to access telephone and on-site translating and interpreting services. The service became operational in July 2011. | |||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Increase access to aged care service information. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | ≥$6.3m | 2010-11 Actual: | $6.8m | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||||
| The department funded 83 organisations nationally to increase access to aged care service information and equip aged care providers with the necessary skills to deliver appropriate care to older people from a diverse cultural or linguistic background. | |||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of nationally funded projects and services for many culturally and linguistically diverse communities. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | >70 | 2010-11 Actual: | 75 | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||||
| The department funded 75 projects nationally to provide communities from a diverse cultural or linguistic background with increased access to aged care services and information. | |||||
| Qualitative KPI: | Usefulness of funded Community Partners program projects and activities in providing access to aged care information and services. | ||||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Progress reports, and appropriate follow up action by department, find that products and activities are reaching the intended target audience and that the content is assisting recipients to make informed choices about access to care. | ||||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||||
| The information is reaching 40 specific culturally and linguistically diverse communities and over 43 language groups, which assists them to make informed choices about access to care. | |||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of aged care recipients, from culturally and linguistically diverse communities, accessing culturally appropriate information and services. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 95% | 2010-11 Actual: | Not measured by the department | ||
| Result: Indicator not met. | |||||
| The department does not collect data to ascertain the percentage of aged care recipients from communities with diverse cultural or linguistic background accessing culturally appropriate information and services. | |||||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Funding provided to aged care providers delivering care under the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care Program. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Funding allocation is timely and culturally appropriate. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department allocated $23.1 million to 29 services funded under the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care Program. | |
| Qualitative KPI: | Funded program projects and activities provide access to appropriate aged care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. |
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Progress reports and appropriate follow up action by the department find that funded activities are achieving required targets. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The projects funded improve the quality of service provider’s infrastructure and/or care delivery and support Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to remain close to family and country, and to receive aged care in a culturally appropriate way. | |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of flexible places available for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 700 | 2010-11 Actual: | 653 |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| In addition to the 653 places funded in 2010-11, funding for 48 new places has been allocated. All of these are currently being developed and constructed and will become operational as works are completed. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of projects undertaken to provide culturally appropriate aged care services to older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 10 | 2010-11 Actual: | 38 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| Due to the high demand for funding and the size of projects, funding was provided to undertake 38 projects. The projects were funded to improve the health, safety and comfort of aged care recipients. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of funded projects completed successfully. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 95% | 2010-11 Actual: | 100% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| The number of successfully completed projects has exceeded the target. Projects included emergency assistance, the purchase of clinical equipment, capital works and operational assistance to residential aged care homes with a significant proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents. | |||
To support the department’s commitment to culturally appropriate aged care, a two-day forum for National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care Program service providers was held in May 2011. The forum provided participants with information about program developments and opportunities to discuss best practice and challenges in delivering culturally appropriate aged care. Topics discussed at the forum included wellness for older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, assessing and managing dementia, and behaviours of concern.
In 2010-11, the department finalised the first Quality Framework for the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care Program. Twenty-one services participated in pilot testing the framework in anticipation of expected implementation in September 2011. The framework uses a continuous improvement approach and aims to improve the quality of care provided by setting culturally appropriate standards for care delivery, management, and accountability. The framework will form the basis of the department’s quality assurance monitoring for the Flexible Aged Care Program and ongoing support will be provided to services during implementation to ensure that they have the resources and capacity to meet the standards.
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Quality Framework is developed and trialled with all flexible services. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Effective stakeholder participation in development of framework and piloting. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| Twenty-one services participated in pilot testing the framework in anticipation of expected implementation in September 2011. | |
The department provides funds to support Indigenous Aged Care Services through other programs. For more information please see Program 4.8 in this Annual Report.
Top of page
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Produce relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner. | |||
| Result: Deliverable met. | ||||
| In 2010-11, the department funded research that quantified the different ageing experiences of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) older people. Additionally, the department funded Partners in Culturally Appropriate Care organisations to conduct state based research on CALD populations profiles and trends. | ||||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues. | |||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholders participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings. | |||
| Result: Deliverable met. | ||||
| Stakeholders participated in program development through regular stakeholder engagement forums, surveys and submissions on departmental discussion papers. Some of the Partners in Culturally Appropriate Care organisations were involved in contributing to the Productivity Commission’s Draft Report Caring for Older Australians.58 | ||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | |||
| 2010-11 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2010-11 Actual: | -0.5% | |
| Result: Deliverable met. | ||||
| The department achieved the performance target for actual administered expenses. | ||||
In response to this emerging public health challenge, the department is taking a two-pronged approach to supporting research into dementia through three Dementia Collaborative Research Centres (the Centres), and the Dementia Research Grants program. The latter is managed and administered by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) on behalf of the department.
In 2010-11, the department provided funding for three Centres: the Assessment and Better Care Centre at the University of New South Wales; the Early Diagnosis and Prevention Centre at the Australian National University; and the Carers and Consumers Centre at the Queensland University of Technology. Priority research directions for 2010-11 included dementia and general practice dementia care nursing, transitions in care, technology and environmental design, community and acute care, nutrition, palliation, pain in dementia, quality of care issues, cognitive testing in the community, risk reduction and diagnostic tools and methods. The Centres undertook more than 150 projects in 2010-11, some of which are in progress. The Centres have a strong emphasis on transferring research outcomes into clinical practice and work closely with clinicians and consumers in designing research projects and determining how best to disseminate this information. Several projects have produced and published literature reviews and guidelines for clinical practice.62
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Funding provided for dementia research and Dementia Collaborative Research Centres. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Timely delivery of progress reports and funding agreement deliverables. | ||||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||||
| The Centres provided satisfactory progress and annual reports and other deliverables within the specified timeframes. | |||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of research projects funded. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 90 | 2010-11 Actual: | 153 | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||||
| The department worked closely with the Centres and other stakeholders in considering and approving research projects. This includes several ongoing projects as well as new projects funded by the NHMRC through the Dementia Research Grants. These projects will address areas such as early intervention, risk reduction, assessment and treatment, care and service delivery and will enhance our understanding of the causes of dementia. | |||||
| Qualitative KPI: | Produce evidence based collaborative research in agreed dementia priority areas. | ||||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | All research projects have 6 and 12 month progress reports that are compliant with funding requirements. | ||||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||||
| The Centres provided their six-monthly progress reports, 12-monthly annual reports within the timeframes and to the standards required by the funding agreements. | |||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of research projects that are collaborative. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 90% | 2010-11 Actual: | 100% | ||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||||
| Projects from all Centres were considered and approved by the department, consumers, service providers and clinicians collaboratively. Implementation of research projects also involved multiple collaborators, either nationally, internationally or both. | |||||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Funding provided for training and career pathways for health professionals and aged care workers. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Timely delivery of progress reports and funding agreement deliverables. | ||||
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||||
| The Dementia Training Study Centres Program (the Training Centres) was evaluated as part of the National Evaluation of the Dementia Initiative undertaken in the previous financial year. In response, the department implemented a new model of operation for the Training Centres, which led to delays in receipt and acceptance of funding agreement deliverables. The changes have now been implemented and the project is now running on schedule. | |||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of training places available to aged care workers. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 4,800 | 2010-11 Actual: | 5,535 | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||||
| The department extended the Dementia Care Essentials program for another 18 months to deliver an additional 5,535 units of the two dementia-specific units of competency in Certificate III and Certificate IV programs in aged care. These units were delivered in all regions across Australia. | |||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of training places taken up to improve skills. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 100% | 2010-11 Actual: | 100% | ||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||||
| The department funded Registered Training Organisations to deliver training to improve the skills of the aged care workforce. These organisations have reported that in many cases, attendance at training is higher than expected. These organisations are on track to deliver more than 10,000 training places by 30 June 2012. | |||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Number of calls to the Dementia Behaviour Management Advisory Services 24 hour helpline. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 9,000 | 2010-11 Actual: | 9,028 |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| In 2010-11, the department worked closely with all eight Dementia Behaviour Management Advisory Service providers to ensure the number of calls to the Dementia Behaviour Management Advisory Services 24 hour helpline reached the target. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of Behaviour Management Advisory Services funded. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 8 | 2010-11 Actual: | 8 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department funded eight organisations to continue the delivery of the Dementia Behaviour Management Advisory Services Program until 30 June 2013. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Provision of funding to organisations to provide clinical advice for aged and community care workers, and carers of people with dementia, where the behaviour of the person with dementia is impacting on their care. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Timely delivery of progress reports and funding agreement deliverables. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The Dementia Behaviour Management Advisory Services provided all progress reports, annual reports and other deliverables within specified timeframes. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Number of calls to the National Dementia Helpline. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 30,000 | 2010-11 Actual: | 28,462 |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||
| In 2010-11, the department worked with Alzheimer’s Australia65 to meet the target of 30,000 calls to the National Dementia Helpline for the twelve month period to 30 June 2011. In this period Alzheimer’s Australia achieved 94.9% of the target with the total number of calls for the period reported to be 28,462. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Provision of funding for information, counselling and support for people with dementia, their carers and families. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Timely delivery of progress reports and funding agreement deliverables. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department funded Alzheimer’s Australia to provide information, counselling and support for people with dementia, their carers and families. They provided satisfactory progress reports, annual reports and other deliverables within the timeframes specified in their funding agreements. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Provision of funding to support local communities to address the needs of people with dementia, their carers and families. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Timely delivery of progress reports and funding agreement deliverables. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department successfully managed the competitive grant process for round four of the Dementia Community Support Grants Program. Funding agreements have been finalised with 32 organisations to implement 34 projects as part of this round. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of state and territory based organisations funded to provide dementia education, information and support. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 8 | 2010-11 Actual: | 8 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department funded Alzheimer’s Australia, to continue delivery of the National Dementia Support Program until 30 June 2013 through the Alzheimer’s Associations in each jurisdiction. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Produce relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| Outcomes of research undertaken by the Centres are translated into clinical practice through publication of articles in peer-reviewed journals, posters and presentations at national and international conferences and seminars, publication of regular newsletters, inclusion of information on the Centres’ website66, and through regular discussions and meetings with relevant stakeholders. The department is working closely with the Centres, consumers, service providers, clinicians and researchers in the translation and adoption of knowledge gained through the research program. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholders participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2010-11, the department, consumers, service providers, clinicians and researchers actively participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, commenting on research proposals and papers, and meetings. The department also worked closely with Alzheimer’s Australia through its National Quality Dementia Care Initiative (NQDCI) and is represented on the NQDCI steering committee. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2010-11 Actual: | 0.6% |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| The department substantially met the performance target for actual administered expenses. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | The Transition Care Program enables older people leaving hospital to access time-limited, goal oriented and therapy-focused care to help them stay at home rather than enter residential aged care permanently. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | In 2010-11, at least 18,000 older people will access transition care services. Of these, 45% are expected to return home after their transition care episode with or without support. | ||||
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||||
| In 2010-11, over 16,000 older people accessed the Transition Care Program. Of people discharged from the program in 2010-11, 48.6% returned home after their time in Transition Care with or without support. | |||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of additional transition care places operational. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 651 | 2010-11 Actual: | 651 | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||||
| In 2010-11, the department worked with state and territory health departments to make the 651 new Transition Care places operational. This brought the number of operational Transition Care places nationally to 3,349. | |||||
| Qualitative KPI: | The percentage of people whose functional capacity (measured using the Modified Barthel Index) improves during a transition care episode. | ||||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | The percentage of people whose functional capacity improves during a transition care episode is 60%. | ||||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||||
| In 2010-11, 59% of people who received Transition Care gained functional improvement. | |||||
| Qualitative KPI: | The percentage of people who return home after their transition care episode with or without support. | ||||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | The percentage of people who return home after their transition care episode is 45%. | ||||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||||
| In 2010-11, 48.6% of people discharged from the Transition Care Program returned home either with or without community care support, rather than needing residential aged care services. | |||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Number of operational transition care places. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 3,349 | 2010-11 Actual: | 3,349 | ||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||||
| In 2010-11, the department worked with state and territory health departments to make the 651 new Transition Care places operational. This brought the number of operational Transition Care places nationally to 3,349. | |||||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Multi-Purpose Services enable older people in rural and remote areas to access community and residential aged care services. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | In 2010-11, at least 3,089 older people in rural and remote areas will access community and residential aged care services through Multi‑Purpose Services. | |||
| Result: Deliverable met. | ||||
| In 2010-11, a total of 3,216 flexible aged care places were operational in Multi-Purpose Services nationally, to provide older people in rural and remote areas with access to care appropriate to their care needs. | ||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of operational flexible aged care places in Multi-Purpose Services. | |||
| 2010-11 Target: | 3,089 | 2010-11 Actual: | 3,216 | |
| Result: Deliverable met. | ||||
| A total of 3,216 flexible aged care places were operational in 2010-11, exceeding the target. This is due to previously allocated places becoming operational earlier than expected. | ||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of Multi‑Purpose Services places allocated. | |||
| 2010-11 Target: | 100% | 2010-11 Actual: | 66% | |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | ||||
| Of the 300 flexible aged care places created for potential allocation in 2010-11, 199 have been allocated. This result reflects the fact that the number of potential Multi-Purpose Service sites identified and able to be fully considered within the financial year was fewer than expected. A range of factors influence whether a particular site may be suitable for consideration as a Multi-Purpose Service. The Australian Government and relevant state and territory governments undertake a comprehensive investigation and consideration of the health and aged care needs of each proposed site to determine whether a Multi-Purpose Service is the most appropriate option. | ||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Estimated number of Extended Aged Care at Home packages allocated. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 7,056 | 2010-11 Actual: | 8,150 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2010-11, the department allocated 2,714 EACH packages as part of the 2009-10 ACAR. This included an additional 1,173 packages in New South Wales, Queensland, Western Australia, Tasmania, Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory due to a lower number of residential places being allocated in those jurisdictions. These allocations bring the total allocated number of EACH packages to 8,150. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Estimated number of Extended Aged Care at Home Dementia packages allocated. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 3,523 | 2010-11 Actual: | 3,995 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2010-11, the department allocated 1,507 EACH-D packages as part of the 2009-10 ACAR. This included an additional 552 packages in New South Wales, Queensland, Western Australia, Tasmania, Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory due to a lower number of residential places being allocated in those jurisdictions. These allocations bring the total allocated number of EACH-D packages to 3,995. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Enhancements to quality review processes implemented in consultation with stakeholders. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholder consultation will take place through the Aged Care Consultative Committee and other stakeholder groups. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department implemented the Community Care Common Standards and reporting processes in consultation with the Ageing Consultative Committee and stakeholders. More than 3,500 community care service provider representatives attended a total of approximately 70 presentations which were conducted nationally. | |||
| Qualitative KPI: | Provision of operational community care ratio, measured by the number of community aged care places per 1,000 people 70 years of age and over. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | The operational community care ratio is 27. | ||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| In 2010, the Government agreed to temporarily increasing the community care ratio from 25 to 27 places per 1,000 people aged 70 years and over. This amendment was in response to the under-subscription of residential places in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 ACAR. This has resulted in the release of an additional 2,551 community care places in the 2009-10 ACAR. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of community care packages for people with complex needs allocated. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 100% | 2010-11 Actual: | 169% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| In the 2009-10 ACAR, the department was able to allocate more EACH and EACH-D packages as a result of the target for the provision of high level community care packages being temporarily increased from 4 to 6 places per 1,000 people aged 70 years and over. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Produce relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The Community Care Census 2008 was published and released in 2010. This census provides comprehensive analysis and reporting of various groups receiving aged care in the community. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholders participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| State and territory jurisdictions are contributing to the ongoing development of the Transition Care Program through active participation in the Transition Care Working Group chaired by the department. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2010-11 Actual: | -4.9% |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| The department did not achieve the performance target for actual administered expenses. This is because of lower than expected expenditure for the Consumer Directed Care (CDC) Packages. The CDC initiative involved a new model of care. There was a slower than expected roll-out of the packages due to the need to put in place new funding and operational arrangements. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of residential aged care places made available in the annual Aged Care Approvals Round, which includes places made available for allocation in conjunction with a zero real interest loan. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 9,076 | 2010-11 Actual: | 10,493 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| For the 2010-11 ACAR, the department made available 10,493 residential aged care places for allocation. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Total value of zero real interest loans offered to aged care providers to build in locations where they may not have previously been prepared to invest. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | $160m | 2010-11 Actual: | $160m |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The second round of the ZRIL initiative, advertised as part of the 2010 ACAR, made available $160 million to aged care providers. | |||
| Qualitative KPI: | Zero real interest loans are allocated to service providers in areas of need. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | All projects funded through zero real interest loans are located in areas of need. | ||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| All offers of loans were made in respect of areas of aged care need, as identified through the ACAR planning process. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Number of residential aged care places per 1,000 people aged 70 years or over. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | ≤88 | 2010-11 Actual: | 85.8 |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||
| In 2010, the Government agreed to temporarily decreasing the residential operational ratio from 88 to 86 places per 1,000 people aged 70 years and over (comprising of 42 high residential care and 44 low residential care places). This amendment was in response to the under-subscription of residential places in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 ACAR and to allow greater flexibility in the balance between residential and community places. As at 30 June 2011, there were 85.8 operational residential aged care places per 1,000 persons aged 70 and over, which is 99.5% of the 2011 target. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Increase in the proportion of residential aged care places that become operational within two years of being allocated. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | > 21% | 2010-11 Actual: | 21.1% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| 21.1% of all residential aged care places allocated in the 2008-09 ACAR and under the ZRIL initiative became operational within two years. | |||
The Aged Care Act 1997 provides for places to become operational within two years after allocation, however in practice, this time can be longer, particularly in respect of residential care which is reliant on acquisition of land, finance, planning and construction approvals, and availability of builders. Approved providers with an allocation of residential aged care places are required to lodge quarterly reports on progress towards making the places operational. These reports are used as the basis for the department’s ongoing monitoring of such places and if no reasonable progress is being made, the department can revoke places.
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Improved analysis and reporting on relative availability and use of aged care for various groups within the community. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Incorporation in published reports of additional information on availability and use of aged care for various groups within the community. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| In 2010-11, the department commenced an evaluation of the Consumer Directed Care (CDC) Initiative, which is comprised of 500 CDC packaged care places and 200 Consumer Directed Respite Care (CDRC) places. The findings of the evaluation will be available in early 2012 and will inform future policy and program management decisions related to CDC in community aged care. | |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of accommodation bond refunds paid through the Accommodation Bond Guarantee Scheme refunded within the statutory timeframe. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | ≥95% | 2010-11 Actual: | Not measurable |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The Accommodation Bond Guarantee Scheme provides security to residents of aged care facilities by refunding any outstanding bonds in the event that a provider becomes insolvent or bankrupt and cannot repay the bond. No refunds were required in 2010-11. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of annual reviews of Aged Care Funding Instrument funding claims to ensure residents are correctly funded. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 20,000 | 2010-11 Actual | 22,330 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| Every year, the department applies risk management principles to target a large number of Aged Care Funding Instrument funding claims for review. In 2010-11, the department completed more reviews than expected, exceeding this target. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Effective compliance action taken to mitigate identified non-compliance. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Appropriate compliance action is taken in a timely manner to mitigate identified non-compliance. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department responded quickly so that all instances of identified non-compliance were rectified appropriately. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of providers with sanctions imposed where immediate and severe risk to the safety, health or wellbeing of care recipients is identified. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 100% | 2010-11 Actual: | 100% |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| Appropriate sanctions were applied to all providers where immediate and severe risk to care recipients was identified. | |||
| Qualitative KPI: | Identified non-compliance is effectively actioned. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | The department takes appropriate action against approved providers of aged care following identified non-compliance. | ||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| The department took appropriate action against approved providers of aged care as issues of non-compliance were identified. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Revision of the accreditation standards in consultation with stakeholders. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholder consultation on the revised standards will occur through the Ageing Consultative Committee. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department consulted with the Ageing Consultative Committee and more broadly with stakeholders across the sector on a revised set of Accreditation Standards to further inform refinement of the draft standards. | |
| Qualitative KPI: | Enhancements to the accreditation process are implemented in consultation with stakeholders. |
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholder consultation on the implementation of enhancements to the accreditation process occurs through the Ageing Consultative Committee. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| In 2010-11, the department developed a new set of Accreditation Grant Principles. The Ageing Consultative Committee considered drafts of the new principles and provided feedback in July 2010, in November 2010 and in March 2011. | |
The department acted on relevant recommendations from the Productivity Commission’s Review of Regulatory Burdens on Business – Social and Economic Infrastructure Services.68 The department implemented changes to the Residential Care Subsidy Principles and the Quality of Care Principles which simplified the way fire safety declarations are reported, which has reduced the regulatory burden on approved providers. The department also worked with the Australian Building Codes Board to pursue the Productivity Commission’s recommendation concerning both privacy and space requirements for aged care services.
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Eligible services undertake essential capital works to upgrade or expand. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | The timely allocation of funds for eligible services to undertake essential capital works to upgrade or expand. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| In 2010-11, a total of 21 aged care services located in remote areas or with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients commenced capital works projects to upgrade or expand facilities and equipment. Another 17 continued work on multiple year projects started in 2009-10. Activities included refurbishment or renovation of existing buildings as well as construction of new facilities, including staff accommodation. | |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of projects undertaken to provide culturally appropriate aged care services to older Indigenous Australians. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 5 | 2010-11 Actual: | 5 | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||||
| Support was provided to five services to improve clinical care, financial management and implement quality systems. | |||||
| Qualitative KPI: | Funded projects and activities provide access to appropriate aged care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. | ||||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Progress reports and appropriate follow-up action by the department find that activities are achieving the intended targets. | ||||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||||
| The department provided support services to ensure that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people had access to appropriate aged care. | |||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Amount of grants paid to eligible aged care services to improve capacity, buildings and equipment in remote Indigenous aged care services. | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | $6.4m | 2010-11 Actual: | $6.4m | ||
| Result: Indicator met. | |||||
| All 2010-11 funds have been allocated to eligible aged care services, with a total of 38 projects funded. Major capital works undertaken included the upgrade of facilities, and construction of staff accommodation, at Galawin’ku, a Remote Service Delivery site in the Northern Territory. Other projects covered the provision of vehicles to allow safe transport of staff and residents, refurbishment of kitchen and laundry facilities and general maintenance and upgrades. | |||||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Produce relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| During 2010-11 the department undertook research and analysis to help inform the department’s two submissions to the Productivity Commission inquiry Caring for Older Australians. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues. | ||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholders participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings. | ||
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department worked with the Ageing Consultative Committee to assist with program development and aged care reform. The Committee met twice during 2010-11 to work through and provide input into proposed initiatives. Its membership is comprised of aged care providers, consumers, professional bodies and government representatives. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2010-11 Actual: | -0.5% |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department achieved the performance target for actual administered expenses. | |||
(A) Budget Estimate1 2010-11 $’000 | (B) Actual 2010-11 $’000 | Variation (Column B minus Column A) $’000 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Program 4.1: Aged Care Assessment | |||
| Administered Expenses | |||
| 1,161 | 217 | (944) |
| Departmental Expenses | |||
| 5,362 | 5,365 | 3 |
| 99 | 110 | 11 |
| 214 | 157 | (57) |
| - | - | - |
| Total for Program 4.1 | 6,836 | 5,849 | (987) |
| Program 4.2: Aged Care Workforce | |||
| Administered Expenses | |||
| 65,424 | 57,655 | (7,769) |
| Departmental Expenses | |||
| 8,148 | 8,154 | 6 |
| 150 | 168 | 18 |
| 326 | 238 | (88) |
| - | 1 | 1 |
| Total for Program 4.2 | 74,048 | 66,216 | (7,832) |
| Program 4.3: Ageing Information and Support | |||
| Administered Expenses | |||
| 43,329 | 38,134 | (5,195) |
| Departmental Expenses | |||
| 67,829 | 67,874 | 45 |
| 1,249 | 1,396 | 147 |
| 2,712 | 1,981 | (731) |
| - | 5 | 5 |
| Total for Program 4.3 | 115,119 | 109,390 | (5,729) |
| Program 4.4: Community Care | |||
| Administered Expenses | |||
| 295,840 | 281,571 | (14,269) |
| |||
| 542,341 | 531,715 | (10,626) |
| 40,935 | 39,541 | (1,394) |
| Departmental Expenses | |||
| 41,909 | 41,936 | 27 |
| 772 | 862 | 90 |
| 1,676 | 1,224 | (452) |
| - | 3 | 3 |
| Total for Program 4.4 | 923,473 | 896,852 | (26,621) |
| Program 4.5: Culturally Appropriate Aged Care | |||
| Administered Expenses | |||
| 32,292 | 32,154 | (138) |
| Departmental Expenses | |||
| 7,357 | 7,362 | 5 |
| 135 | 151 | 16 |
| 294 | 215 | (79) |
| - | 1 | 1 |
| Total for Program 4.5 | 40,078 | 39,883 | (195) |
| Program 4.6: Dementia | |||
| Administered Expenses | |||
| 31,278 | 31,491 | 213 |
| Departmental Expenses | |||
| 3,158 | 3,161 | 3 |
| 58 | 65 | 7 |
| 127 | 92 | (35) |
| - | - | - |
| Total for Program 4.6 | 34,621 | 34,809 | 188 |
| Program 4.7: Flexible Aged Care | |||
| Administered Expenses | |||
| |||
| 660,908 | 628,321 | (32,587) |
| Departmental Expenses | |||
| 6,840 | 6,844 | 4 |
| 126 | 141 | 15 |
| 273 | 200 | (73) |
| - | 1 | 1 |
| Total for Program 4.7 | 668,147 | 635,507 | (32,640) |
| Program 4.8: Residential Care | |||
| Administered Expenses | |||
| 69,476 | 54,979 | (14,497) |
| |||
| 6,627,915 | 6,721,389 | 93,474 |
| - | 5,585 | 5,585 |
| |||
| 124,587 | 7,835 | (116,752) |
| Departmental Expenses | |||
| 46,060 | 46,091 | 31 |
| 848 | 948 | 100 |
| 1,842 | 1,345 | (497) |
| - | 3 | 3 |
| Total for Program 4.8 | 6,870,728 | 6,838,175 | (32,553) |
| Outcome 4 Totals by appropriation type | |||
| Administered Expenses | |||
| 538,800 | 496,201 | (42,599) |
| 7,872,099 | 7,926,551 | 54,452 |
| 124,587 | 7,835 | (116,752) |
| Departmental Expenses | - | ||
| 186,663 | 186,787 | 124 |
| 3,437 | 3,841 | 404 |
| 7,464 | 5,452 | (2,012) |
| - | 14 | 14 |
| Total expenses for Outcome 4 | 8,733,050 | 8,626,681 | (106,369) |
| Average Staffing Level (Number) | 1,282 | 1,280 | (2) |
1 | |||
38 Available at: www.agedcareaustralia.gov.au
39 Available at: www.yourhealth.gov.au
40 Available at: www.agedcareaustralia.gov.au
41 Telephone on: 1800 500 853.
42 From 1 September 2011, known as the Aged Care Complaints Scheme.
43 From 1 September 2011, known as the Aged Care Complaints Scheme.
44 Available at: http://agedcarecomplaints.govspace.gov.au
45 Telephone on: 1800 550 552.f
46 Mail to Aged Care Complaints Scheme, Department of Health and Ageing, GPO Box 9848 in your capital city.
47 Available at: www.health.gov.au
48 Available at: www.yourhealth.gov.au
49 Available at: www.agedcareaustralia.gov.au
50 A long wait case is a case open for more than 180 days.
51 Available at: www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/ageing-rescare-cvs-cvs.htm
52 Available at: www.yourhealth.gov.au
53 More information on this topic can be found in Program 4.5 of this Annual Report.
54 Available at: www.health.gov.au
55 Available at: www.health.gov.au/ddrpilot
56 Telephone: 1800 200 422.
57 Available at: www.agedcareaustralia.gov.au
58 Available at: www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/aged-care/draft
59 Access Economics (2009). Keeping dementia front of mind: incidence and prevalence 2009-2050 Access Economics, Canberra.
60 Arkles, RS; Jackson Pulver, LR; Draper, B; Chalkley, S and Broe, GA. (2010) Ageing, Cognition and dementia in Australian Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander Peoples: Neuroscience Research Australia and Muru Marri Indigenous Health Unit, UNSW, p.i
61 AIHW (2010) Australia’s Health p.58-59. http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442468376&tab=2
62 Available at: www.dementia.unsw.edu.au
63 Telephone on: 1800 699 799.
64 Telephone on: 1800 100 500.
65 Available at: www.alzheimers.org.au
66 Available at: www.dementia.unsw.edu.au
67 For more information on the Aged Care Approvals Round, please see Program 4.4 in this Annual Report.
68 Available at: http://www.pc.gov.au/
When accessing large documents (over 500 KB in size), it is recommended that the following procedure be used:
Attempting to open large documents within the browser window (by left-clicking)
may inhibit your ability to continue browsing while the document is
opening and/or lead to system problems.
To view PDF (Portable Document Format) documents, you will need to have a PDF reader installed on your computer. A number of PDF readers are available through the Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) Web Guide website.
Produced by the Portfolio Strategies Division, Australian
Government Department of Health and Ageing.
URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/annrpt/publishing.nsf/Content/annual-report-1011-toc~1011part2~1011part2.4~1011outcome4
If you would like to know more or give us your comments contact: annrep@health.gov.au