Home page iconHOME |   Contents page iconCONTENTS |   Search iconSEARCH |  Previous Years  PREVIOUS YEARS |
Table of contents

  You are in:

Outcome 13 – Acute Care

Improved access to public hospitals, acute and subacute care services and public dental services through targeted strategies and payments to state and territory governments

prev page | TOC | next page


PDF printable version of Outcome 13 Acute Care (PDF 641 KB)

Outcome Strategy

Outcome 13 aims to improve the efficiency of, and access to, public hospitals, acute and subacute care services, and public dental services by delivering major reform through the National Health Reform Agreement. The department worked to achieve this Outcome by managing initiatives under the programs outlined below.

This chapter reports on the major activities undertaken by the department during the year, reporting against each of the major activities and performance indicators published in the Outcome 13 chapter of the 2010-11 Health and Ageing Portfolio Budget Statements (PB Statements) and the 2010-11 Health and Ageing Portfolio Additional Estimates Statements (PAES). It also includes a table summarising the estimated and actual expenditure for this Outcome.

Outcome 13 was managed in 2010-11 by the Acute Care Division, the Regulatory Policy and Governance Division and the Transition Office.

Program NameProgram Objectives in 2010-11
Program 13.1:
Blood and Organ Donation Services
  • Support a nationally coordinated approach to organ and tissue donation for transplantation.
  • Support access to an adequate, safe, secure and affordable supply of blood and blood products, through policy advice and funding contribution to the National Supply Plan and Budget as set out in the National Blood Agreement.
Program 13.2: Medical Indemnity
  • Ensure stability for the medical indemnity insurance industry.
  • Ensure insurance products are affordable for doctors.
  • Support accessible and affordable insurance products for midwives.
Program 13.3: Public Hospitals and Information
  • Design and implement far-reaching reforms, including negotiating a new National Health Reform Agreement on National Health Reform and revising the National Partnership Agreement on Improving Public Hospital Services (NPA IPHS).
  • Continue to implement and monitor the ongoing programs under the National Partnership Agreement on Hospital and Health Workforce Reform (NPA HHWR) and the National Partnership Agreement on the Elective Surgery Waiting List Reduction Plan (NPA ESWLRP).
  • Improving the collection of performance data to increase our knowledge about hospital performance and reporting and to sharpen public accountability.
  • Promote and improve public access to dental services.
  • Ensure patients in north western Tasmania, have continued access to health care and other support services, through the Commonwealth’s agreement with Tasmania for the management, operation and funding of the Mersey Hospital.

Major Achievements

2010-11 Health Reforms

In 2010-11, the department continued to implement key elements common to both the April 2010 National Health and Hospital Agreement and the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) Heads of Agreement – National Health Reform, signed by the Commonwealth and all states and territories on 13 February 2011, while also contributing to the development of a detailed National Health Reform Agreement (NHRA). The NHRA was agreed by all states and territories on 2 August 2011.

The department worked collaboratively with the states and territories in 2010-11 to finalise Implementation Plans for all initiatives under the National Partnership Agreement on Improving Public Hospital Services (NPA IPHS).

As part of the Heads of Agreement – National Health Reform, governments agreed to establish an Expert Panel to review the implementation of the Elective Surgery Targets and National Access Guarantee and the National Access Target for emergency departments particularly, in regard to practical impediments and safety and quality issues related to their implementation and application. The Expert panel delivered its review findings and recommendations to COAG on 30 June 2011.

The department also worked with the states and territories to support the establishment of Local Hospital Networks. Under the Heads of Agreement – National Health Reform states and territories agreed to implement the first group of Local Hospital Networks by 1 July 2011 (NSW Networks became operational from 1 January 2011), with remaining Networks to be established by 1 July 2012. This new structure devolves hospital system management to the local level leading to increased autonomy and flexibility, enabling services to be more responsive to local needs. Local Hospital Network governing councils will engage with local clinicians and the community to improve hospital services.

  • Launch of the MyHospitals website 126 on 10 December 2010 by the Minister for Health and Ageing. MyHospitals is the first website to publish nationally consistent hospital-level performance information.
  • States and territories commenced nearly 80 projects with Commonwealth funding (20 of which have now been completed) in 43 public hospitals across Australia, under the Taking Pressure off Public Hospitals initiative.
  • Approved Implementation Plans for the NPA IPHS which includes the delivery of improved access to elective surgery and subacute care services and reduce/shorten waiting times in emergency departments.
  • Conducted negotiations leading to the Australian Government signing a new agreement with the Tasmanian Government to continue the management and operation of the Mersey Community Hospital, which will ensure patients in north western Tasmania continue to receive high quality, safe and integrated hospital services.
  • Developed a four year Clinical Services Plan for the National Cord Blood Collection Network to improve access to matched transplants from cord blood.

Top of page

Challenges

  • Finalising a nationally consistent method for measuring growth in subacute care by August 2011, which is necessary to measure performance against the new subacute beds and services targets under the NPA IPHS.
  • Ensuring sufficient units of cord blood are collected from Indigenous Australians and other ethnically and culturally diverse communities to meet targets for Australia’s public cord blood collection network.
  • Managing the implementation of the Commonwealth Dental Health Program (CDHP) as the planned closure of the previous government’s Medicare Chronic Disease Dental Scheme did not proceed in 2010-11, with the consequence that funding for CDHP was not available.


Program 13.1: Blood and Organ Donation Services

Program 13.1 aims to support a nationally coordinated approach to organ and tissue donation for transplantation. It also aims to support access to an adequate, safe, secure and affordable supply of blood and blood products, through policy advice and funding contribution to the National Supply Plan and Budget as set out in the National Blood Agreement.

Improve Australians’ Access to Organ and Tissue Transplants

In 2010-11, the department helped guide the implementation of reforms aimed at establishing Australia as a world leader in organ and tissue donation, by providing advice and governance support to the Australian Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Authority. The reforms aim to achieve a significant and lasting increase in the number of life-saving and life-transforming transplants for Australians through the introduction of nationally consistent donation processes and systems in hospital settings, supported by dedicated donation specialists, together with a nationally coordinated approach to community and professional awareness and education.

The department continued to fund the Australian Bone Marrow Donor Registry to maximise the chance of a suitable donor match, either in Australia or overseas, for a patient needing a bone marrow, cord blood or peripheral blood stem cell transplant. In 2010-11, the Registry undertook 514 donor searches on behalf of Australian patients, with 271 Australian patients with leukaemia or other life-threatening haematological or immune system diseases receiving a bone marrow, peripheral blood or cord blood transplant. Through the Bone Marrow Transplant Program, the department approved financial assistance for 207 patients in Australia, for the costs of obtaining and transporting bone marrow or stem cells from international donors.

Quantitative KPI:Percentage of eligible Australians in need of a bone marrow, cord blood or peripheral stem cell transplant who are able to access appropriate treatment.
2010-11 Target:100%2010-11 Actual:100%
Result: Indicator met.
In 2010-11, 129 Australians accessed treatment through the Australian Bone Marrow Donor Registry and 142 Australians accessed treatment through international registries. Australia provided 133 bone marrow, cord blood or peripheral blood stem cell donations to overseas recipients.

The department also funded the National Cord Blood Collection Network to collect, process, bank and release high quality, compatible umbilical cord blood stem cell units to Australian and international transplant centres for patients in need of a transplant. In 2010-11, 33 units were released for Australian patients and 99 units for international patients. The network facilitated the importation of 19 cord blood units from international registries, for transplantation into Australian patients for whom a suitably matched unit was not available from within the Australian inventory.
Quantitative Deliverable:Number of banked cord blood units.
2010-11 Target:Total: 2,379
Indigenous: 129
2010-11 Actual:Total: 1,880
Indigenous: 74
Result: Deliverable substantially met.
In 2010-11, both the total number of cord blood units and the number collected from Indigenous donors were below targets. Total collections overall were below target due to staff shortages and budget pressures. The target for Indigenous donors has historically been challenging as only donations from the Royal Darwin Hospital collection centre are included. Under the new Clinical Services Plan collection processes will now target donations from Indigenous mothers at all Network centres. The department will work with the Network in 2011-12 to implement the Clinical Services Plan based on a revised budget and ensure that appropriate targets for Indigenous, ethnically diverse and total donations are met.

Top of page

The department supported the development of a new four-year Clinical Services Plan for the Network. The plan describes new cord blood collection and banking strategies to increase the proportion and number of high cell count units and units collected from Indigenous Australians and other ethnically and culturally diverse donors. Implementation of the plan will increase the likelihood of a compatible unit being available for Australian patients requiring a cord blood transplant.

The department continued to fund the construction of a state-of-the-art facility for the Donor Tissue Bank of Victoria. When completed, Australians will have improved access to high quality tissue grafts for transplantation.

Support Access to Blood and Blood Products

The department continued to support access to an appropriate, affordable and quality blood supply, by delivering the Commonwealth’s contribution of 63% of the funding to the blood sector through the National Blood Agreement, providing governance support to the National Blood Authority and chairing and membership of the Jurisdictional Blood Committee.

In 2010-11, a new health technology assessment mechanism for blood and blood products was agreed to be developed through the Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC). This mechanism will ensure that the Government receives independent expert advice on the cost-effectiveness of proposals to fund these products. The department is working with the states and territories through the Jurisdictional Blood Committee, and also with the National Blood Authority, and the MSAC to implement the mechanism during 2011-12.

Qualitative Deliverable:Process established to assess funding proposals for new blood products or services.
2010-11 Reference Point:An agreed framework was established in 2010-11.
Result: Deliverable met.
The department adopted the Medical Services Advisory Committee as the health technology assessment mechanism to inform the Australian Government’s position in funding blood and blood products. This mechanism is consistent with Schedule 4 of the National Blood Agreement, as an evidence-based process for assessment and advice to the Australian Government to support decision making.

The department managed four research projects considering the factors driving Australia’s increasing demand for blood and blood products and the gaps in current knowledge. These projects are assisting the department to develop future strategies for better forecasting and demand management while focussing on improving patient safety and clinical outcomes.

The department continued to assist people with haemophilia, von Willebrand disease and related inheritable disorders, by funding the Haemophilia Foundation of Australia (HFA) for activities such as advocacy, education, and best practice advice on treatment. After reviewing the HFA’s operations, the department provided funding to assist the particular needs of younger people with bleeding disorders, particularly to assist the HFA to develop strategies to better respond to the needs of this group.

The department continued to provide funding, through the Health and Hospitals Fund, to the Australian Red Cross Blood Service to substantially complete construction of a new blood processing site in Melbourne, serving Victoria and Tasmania. 100% of funding has now been provided. The site will improve the efficiency and long-term capacity of the Blood Service to produce quality blood products for the Australian community.

Quantitative Deliverable:Percentage of the total contribution, made by the Australian Government, to the approved National Supply Plan and Budget.
2010-11 Target:63%2010-11 Actual:63%
Result: Deliverable met.
This was achieved through contribution by the Australian Government to 63% of the National Supply Plan and Budget.
Quantitative KPI:Number of applications for funding of new blood products assessed within target timeframe.
2010-11 Target:80%2010-11 Actual:Not applicable
Result: Not applicable.
No applications were referred for assessment during 2010-11. The implementation of the project was delayed due to extensive internal consultations and with the National Blood Authority and the MSAC Executive. Implementation of the project is now expected to occur in 2011-12 financial year.
Top of page

Whole of Program Performance Information

Qualitative Deliverable:Produce relevant and timely evidence‑based policy research.
2010-11 Reference Point:Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner.
Result: Deliverable met.
The department continued to provide high quality, relevant and timely advice to Ministers on organ and tissue donation, and blood issues based on evidence-based policy research.
Qualitative Deliverable:Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues.
2010-11 Reference Point:Stakeholders participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings.
Result: Deliverable met.
The department worked with state and territory governments and sector representatives to improve access to blood and blood products and organ and tissue transplants by ensuring that policy directions consider the perspectives of all stakeholders. The department consulted stakeholders through the inaugural meeting of the Strategic Blood Policy Forum, regular meetings of the Jurisdictional Blood Committee, the Clinical Services Plan Reference Group for the National Cord Blood Collection Network (AusCord) and the reference group established to inform the four blood-related projects undertaken in 2010-11.
Quantitative Deliverable:Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses.
2010-11 Target:0.5%2010-11 Actual:-1.1%
Result: Deliverable not met.
The Bone Marrow Transplant Program and Blood Sector Payments experienced underspends as expenditure is driven by demand, which was lower than anticipated for 2010-11. The underspend for the Managing Access to Blood Products Program is due to delays in implementation as a result of the extensive consultations required in the developments of the new arrangements.
Top of page

Program 13.2: Medical indemnity

Program 13.2 aims to ensure that the medical indemnity insurance industry is stable. It also aims to ensure that the insurance products are affordable for doctors and are accessible and affordable for midwives.

Ensure Stability of the Medical Indemnity Insurance Industry


Stability in the medical indemnity insurance industry is very important, as it means that premiums for doctors remain at affordable and predictable levels, which helps insurers to operate within prudential standards. The department administers three programs which provide stability to the industry: the High Cost Scheme; the Exceptional Claims Scheme; and the Incurred-But-Not-Reported Scheme. The results of these programs are stable fees for patients, and a medical workforce that can focus on the delivery of high quality medical services.

In 2010-11, the department continued to ensure the stability of the industry through regulation and ongoing monitoring of the operations and activities of medical indemnity insurers.

Qualitative Deliverable:Publish reports by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare on medical indemnity.
2010-11 Reference Point:Timely provision and analysis of data.
Result: Deliverable met.
The department worked closely with the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and other Medical Indemnity Data Working Group stakeholders to assist in the publication of two reports on medical indemnity claims.

Keep Premiums Affordable for Doctors

Affordable medical indemnity insurance helps to keep fees stable for patients. To maintain affordability for medical practitioners, the department continued to oversee the administration of the Premium Support Scheme and the Run-off Cover Scheme. These schemes are delivered by contracted medical indemnity insurers on behalf of the Commonwealth.
Quantitative KPI:Number of doctors that receive a premium subsidy support under the Premium Support Scheme.
2010-11 Target:2,5002010-11 Actual:2194
Result: Indicator met.
This is a reduction from the 2,443 doctors who received a premium subsidy in 2009-10. A reduction in the number of doctors receiving a premium subsidy under the Premium Support Scheme generally indicates that medical indemnity premiums are more affordable.
Quantitative Deliverable:Percentage of eligible applicants receiving a premium subsidy.
2010-11 Target:100%2010-11 Actual:100%
Result: Deliverable met.
All eligible doctors who applied for a premium subsidy received it.
Quantitative KPI:Percentage of eligible applicants receiving a premium subsidy.
2010-11 Target:100%2010-11 Actual:100%
Result: Indicator met.
All eligible doctors who applied for a premium subsidy received it.
Top of page

Ensure Availability of Professional Indemnity Insurance for Eligible Midwives

From 1 July 2010, privately practising midwives have been able to access adequate and affordable professional indemnity insurance. The protection this insurance provides not only benefits midwives, but also the women they care for. The department has a contract with an insurer, Medical Insurance Australia Pty Ltd, part of the Medical Insurance Group Australia (MIGA), to provide professional indemnity insurance to midwives.
The Midwife Professional Indemnity Schemes are demand driven programs that respond to claims when they are lodged by the insurer. For claims over $100,000, the Government will pay 80% of the amount exceeding $100,000, and pay 100% of the amount exceeding $2 million. A run-off cover scheme, funded by a tax on midwife professional indemnity premiums, covers claims against midwives after they leave the workforce or retire.

In 2010-11 the department managed the contract with MIGA in conjunction with Medicare Australia. In the period to 30 June 2011 there were no claims made.
Qualitative Deliverable:An appropriate professional indemnity insurance product is available.
2010-11 Reference Point:Product is available to eligible midwives from 1 July 2010.
Result: Deliverable met.
Eligible privately practising midwives were able to purchase Commonwealth supported professional indemnity insurance from MIGA from 1 July 2010.
Quantitative Deliverable:Percentage of eligible midwife applicants covered under the Midwife Professional Indemnity Scheme.
2010-11 Target:100%2010-11 Actual:100%
Result: Deliverable met.
All eligible privately practising midwives who applied for professional indemnity insurance through MIGA were offered cover.

Whole of Program Performance Information

Qualitative Deliverable:Produce relevant and timely evidence-based policy research.
2010-11 Reference Point:Relevant evidence‑based policy research produced in a timely manner.
Result: Deliverable met.
The department provided policy advice on emerging trends in the medical indemnity industry to the Australian Government in a timely manner based on analysis and monitoring of qualitative data on medical indemnity trends and issues.
Qualitative Deliverable:Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues.
2010-11 Reference Point:Stakeholders participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative meetings, conferences and stakeholder engagement.
Result: Deliverable met.
The department worked closely with Medicare Australia, the Australian Government Actuary and medical indemnity insurers to ensure that the medical indemnity program continued to meet its policy objectives.
Quantitative Deliverable:Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses.
2010-11 Target:0.5%2010-11 Actual:-47.4%
Result: Deliverable not met.
While the deliverable was not met, the program objectives were substantially met. Medical Indemnity programs only respond to finalised claims when they are lodged by medical indemnity insurers. Total claims have been less than estimated by the Australian Government Actuary. Any remaining actuarially estimated liabilities are carried forward.
Top of page

Program 13.3: Public Hospitals and Information

Program 13.3 aims to support the reform of and improvements to, the efficiency and quality of Australia’s public hospital system.

In 2010-11, the department, in collaboration with the states and territories continued to manage the relevant components of the National Health Reform Agreement, the National Partnership Agreement on Hospital and Health Workforce Reform (NPA HHWR), the National Partnership on Elective Surgery Waiting List Reduction Plan (ESWLRP) and the introduction of new major reforms including implementation of the revised National Partnership Agreement on Improving Public Hospitals (NPA IPHS).

Program 13.3 also aims to improve public access to dental services and health care services in north-western Tasmania, and to support improvement to the information available on hospital performance reporting and accountability.

National Partnership Agreement on Improving Public Hospitals Services (NPA IPHS)

The NPA IPHS supports the objectives of the broader National Health Reform Agreement by seeking to improve public patient access to elective surgery, emergency departments and subacute care services through providing funding of $3.4 billion over five years to improve efficiency and capacity in public hospitals. This NPA also complements and builds on the previous work of the NPA HHWR and the NPA ESWLRP. In 2010-11, the department in its administration of the NPA IPHS, provided nearly $1 billion in funding to states and territories, benefiting more than 145 hospitals with over 340 projects across Australia.

Emergency Departments

Emergency Departments are the face of the public hospital system. In 2009-10, Australian public hospitals provided almost 7.4 million accident and emergency services with an annual growth rate of 4.3% over the last five years.127 This demand for services has placed stress on the health system and its ability to meet the challenges of delivering timely access to services for patients. The reforms announced in 2010, sought to address this by introducing a new Emergency Department Four Hour Access Target initiative as part of the suite of performance measures.

In 2010, through the NPA IPHS, the department has administered and managed the program of funding to states and territories, to build system capacity to work towards achieving these new measures and improve patient access to emergency services.

In December 2010, a Cross Jurisdictional Clinical Advisory Group (CJCAG) was established by the Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council (AHMAC), to research and make recommendation on a nationally consistent definition of patients for who it is clinically appropriate to stay in an Emergency Department over four hours. The CJCAG has provided its final report to both the Expert Panel established after the February 2011 COAG meeting and AHMAC.

In 2010-11, the department also continued managing the outcomes of the NPA HHWR – Taking the Pressure off Public Hospitals initiative which is working to improve timely treatment in Emergency Departments by reducing the length of stay patients need to wait for treatment.

Quantitative KPI:Percentage of patients presenting to a public hospital emergency department admitted, referred for treatment, or discharged within four hours, where clinically appropriate.
2010-11 Target:Triage category 1 from
1 January 2011
2010-11 Actual:Cannot be reported.128
Result: Cannot be reported.
Assessment periods for the triage category-based Emergency Department four hour National Access Target are twelve month periods, commencing 1 January 2011. Performance data for the first assessment period are due to be provided to the COAG Reform Council by 28 February 2012.

An Expert Panel was established as a result of agreement at the February 2011 COAG meeting to review the mechanisms through which Elective Surgery and Emergency Department targets and the National Access Guarantee are to be implemented and applied. The Panel provided its final report to COAG on 30 June 2011. Targets for emergency departments and elective surgery in the NPA IPHS were changed following the Expert Panel’s recommendations.

Top of page

Elective Surgery

Elective surgery is surgery that, in the opinion of the treating clinician is not an emergency and can be delayed for at least 24 hours. Demand for this surgery is increasing in Australia. Improving elective surgery performance is important in helping more patients receive the surgery they need sooner and to improve their quality of life.

In 2010, the department administered the NPA ESWLRP. The third and final stage of the plan concluded in December 2010. Under this initiative states and territories were successful in increasing elective surgery procedures.

Elective Surgery performance measures were introduced in 2010 as part of National Health Reform, similar to those for Emergencies Departments. Through the NPA IPHS the department has administered and managed the program of funding to states and territories, to build system capacity to work towards meeting these new measures and to improve patient access to elective surgery within the clinically recommended times.

Qualitative Deliverable:Elective surgery data reported on state and territory departments of health websites.
2010-11 Reference Point:Elective surgery data publicly available in a timely manner.
Result: Deliverable substantially met.
In 2010-11 as part of the NPA ESWLRP, a number of states and territories reported on elective surgery performance in public hospitals through their websites. States and territories have committed to maintaining effort in elective surgery and report on a quarterly basis.
Quantitative KPI:Percentage of public hospital elective surgery patients seen within clinically recommended times.
2010-11 Target:N/A2010-11 Actual:N/A
Result: N/A

In 2010-11, elective surgery activities under the NPA IPHS were focused on the planning and establishment of projects to increase the percentage of public hospital elective surgery patients seen within clinically recommended times. Annual targets for achieving this increase are set out in the NPA, with the first round of state and territory performance data to be assessed against these targets by the department in early 2012.

An Expert Panel was established as a result of agreement at the February 2011 COAG meeting to review the mechanisms through which elective surgery and emergency department targets and the National Access Guarantee are to be implemented and applied. The Panel provided its final report to COAG on 30 June 2011. Targets for emergency departments and elective surgery in the NPA IPHS were changed following the Expert Panel’s recommendations.

Quantitative KPI:Number of elective surgery procedures undertaken.
2010-11 Target:624,8132010-11 Actual:659,685
Result: Indicator met.
Under Stage Three of the Elective Surgery Waiting List Reduction Plan, states and territories are eligible to receive up to $300 million in facilitation and reward funding to improve the delivery of elective surgery and reduce the number of patients waiting longer than the clinically recommended times. As a result, the target for elective surgery procedures was exceeded by 34,872.129
Quantitative KPI:Percentage increase in the volume of elective surgery performed across Australia.
2010-11 Target:3.4%2010-11 Actual:5.2%
Result: Indicator met.
In 2010-11, the aim under Stage Three of the Elective Surgery Waiting List Reduction Plan was to increase the volume of elective surgery admissions across Australia and improve management of waiting lists, in particular overdue patients. States and territories were rewarded for achieving set targets under this stage, with the percentage increase exceeding the 2010-11 targets.
Qualitative Deliverable:Meet the Commonwealth obligations under the National Partnership Agreement on Hospital and Health Workforce Reform implementation requirements.
2010-11 Reference Point:Requirements are finalised as agreed in the National Partnership Agreement.
Result: Deliverable met.
Funding of $750 million was provided in 2009 to reform and improve the functioning of emergency departments so that by 2012-13, 80% of emergency department presentations are seen within clinically recommended triage times as recommended by the Australian College of Emergency Medicine. A further measure is the requirement that by 2013-14, 95% of hospitals with an emergency department, report to the non-admitted emergency department care national minimum data set collection.

The department continues to monitor progress of the projects funded under these initiatives as reflected in state and territory annual reports, which are published on each state and territory government’s website.130

Under the NPA HHWR, the Australian Government worked in close collaboration with state and territory governments, to monitor ongoing progress with implementation of subacute care and emergency department initiatives.
Top of page

Subacute Care

Subacute care covers a range of areas including rehabilitation, palliative care, geriatric evaluation and management and subacute mental health. This level of care is important to help people regain functional capacity after illness or injury and improve their quality of life and health outcomes. Subacute care can be offered in hospitals as well as in the community and this often has the advantage of a service being located closer to home for many people.

In 2010-11, under the NPA HHWR, the department continued to work with the states and territories, to increase the volume and quality of subacute services across Australia in both hospital and community settings by 5% per annum or 20% over the period of the Agreement, and to improve and strengthen the capacity of the multi-disciplinary subacute workforce.

Quantitative Deliverable:Percentage increase in volume of subacute care services provided in community settings and public hospitals by the states and territories under the NPA HHWR.
2010-11 Target:5% growth in services against state baselines.2010-11 Actual:Data will be available by December 2011.
Result: Cannot be reported.
Data to determine whether this deliverable was met for 2010-11 will be available in December 2011 and will be reported on the Productivity Commission’s website.130 Based on quarterly reporting information for 2010-11 activities to expand subacute care are on track.
Qualitative KPI:Enhanced provision and improved mix of subacute care services for hospital and out‑of‑hospital care.
2010-11 Reference Point:States and territories reporting demonstrates enhanced provision and improved mix of services.
Result: Indicator met.
States and territories are able to allocate and distribute their funding based on identified needs and gaps in subacute care within their respective state or territory. Many of the services will be provided outside of hospitals as most states and territories plan to increase their outpatient and community-based subacute services.
Top of page

Examples of NPA HHWR Subacute Projects:131

  • Western Australia – Expansion of the existing rehabilitation in the home services for the Osborne Park and Joondalup Hospital sites;
  • Tasmania – Enhanced palliative care integrated services through the recruitment of clinical nurse consultants and allied heath professionals;
  • Australian Capital Territory – Enhanced Aged Care and Rehabilitation Service Equipment Loan Service to expand the range of equipment available to rehabilitation patients in the ACT;
  • Northern Territory – Establishment of a multi-disciplinary rehabilitation Step-Down Unit at the Royal Darwin Hospital;
  • South Australia – Establishment of specialist inpatient and ambulatory Geriatric Evaluation and Management services at Whyalla Hospital;
  • Queensland – Expansion of the provision of the Online Geriatric Assessment Service to the 20 major Queensland public hospitals;
  • Victoria – Austin Health opened a new 24 bed acute aged care ward on their subacute campus, Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital, to allow for direct admission from the Emergency Department or early transfer from acute care to a more appropriate subacute care setting with the aim of reducing functional decline in at risk older people and reducing unnecessarily long lengths of stay; and
  • New South Wales – Enhancement of Specialist Mental Health Services for Older People at St Vincent’s, Prince of Wales and St George Hospitals through the recruitment of Clinical Nurse Consultant and Clinical Psychologist positions.

In 2010-11, the department also managed the introduction of the New Subacute Beds Guarantee initiative under the NPA IPHS, which aims to deliver 1,316 new subacute beds and bed equivalent services throughout Australia, over the life of the Agreement.

The New Subacute Beds Guarantee contributes to increasing the efficiency of the health care system by ensuring patients are treated in the most appropriate settings, which reduces the pressure on public hospitals and in particular, public hospital emergency departments.

Quantitative KPI:Number subacute beds and bed equivalent services delivered by states and territories under the NPA IPHS.
2010-11 Target:329 new subacute beds or bed equivalent services.2010-11 Actual:Data will be available in November 2011.
Result: Cannot be reported.
A nationally consistent method to measure growth in subacute care was not finalised in 2010-11.
The methods enables the conversion of bed equivalent services to bed numbers to allow for comparative reporting under this measure. Due to the delay, the reporting used to measure this deliverable will apply from November 2011.

Top of page

Improve Performance Reporting and Accountability

In 2010-11, the department funded the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare to develop the MyHospitals132 website to publish nationally consistent hospital-level performance information. The MyHospitals website is designed to better inform the community about hospitals by making it easier for people to access information about how individual hospitals are performing.

The MyHospitals website provides hospital level information, enabling patients to be more informed about the services each hospital provides and its performance against nationally consistent measures, including statistics on waiting times for elective surgery and emergency department care.

The website has been well received by the public and media. In the seven months since its launch MyHospitals has had a total of 265,123 visits. As at 30 June 2011, the website included information for 769 public hospitals and 211 private hospitals. Additional information will be added in the future providing patients with comparable information about the quality and safety of hospitals.

The department also worked with states and territories under the NPA IPHS to improve data collections and reporting on emergency department presentations, elective surgeries, subacute care and for non-admitted patients.

Qualitative Deliverable:Data development work, including creation of a new non-admitted outpatient care national minimum data set, to enable national reporting of performance.
2010-11 Reference Point:Non-admitted outpatient care national minimum data set implemented by 30 June 2011.
Result: Deliverable met.
This deliverable was substantially met in the form of a patient level non-admitted outpatient care data set specification which was endorsed by the Health Reform Initiative Group for implementation from 1 July 2011. It is envisaged the data collection will be implemented as a national minimum data set in the future once data coverage issues are addressed under the ‘Activity Based Funding’ elements of the National Health Reforms.
Qualitative Deliverable:Release of average cost of procedures in public and private hospital activity.
2010-11 Reference Point:National Hospital Cost Data Collection 2010 released by June 2011.
Result: Deliverable not met.
This deliverable was not met during 2010-11 because the cost data is being realigned to meet the needs of the ‘Activity Based Funding’ component of the National Health Reforms. The information is expected to be available in early 2012.
Top of page

Improve Access to Public Dental Services

Commonwealth Dental Health Program

Through the Commonwealth Dental Health Program, the Australian Government intends to provide funding to the state and territory governments for about one million additional public dental visits over three years which is contingent on the closure of the Medicare Chronic Disease Dental Scheme (discussed in Outcome 3 - Access to Medical Services). Since the closure of the Medicare Chronic Disease Dental Scheme did not proceed in 2010-11, the Commonwealth Dental Health Program was not implemented.

Quantitative Deliverable:Number of additional public dental visits delivered by the states and territories above agreed baseline. Measured by a reduction in state and territory public dental waiting list for priority groups assisted (Commencement date subject to Senate decision).
2010-11 Target:333,0002010-11 Actual:0
Result: Deliverable not met.
The planned closure of the previous government’s Medicare Chronic Disease Dental Scheme did not proceed in 2010-11 with the consequence that funding for implementing the Commonwealth Dental Health Program was not available.

Closing the Gap— Indigenous Dental Services in Regional and Rural Areas

Indigenous Australians in rural and regional areas have poorer oral health than other Australians. Barriers can include lack of availability of oral health services, and affordability of and access to those services, where they do exist. It can also be difficult to recruit and retain dental staff outside metropolitan areas. The objective of this program is to provide and assess the effectiveness of mobile dental equipment and services in communities where dental services and facilities are scarce. In 2010-11 the department funded six pilot projects which will provide mobile dental equipment and services to a number of Indigenous communities in Queensland, Western Australia and South Australia. The department has also engaged a consultant to evaluate the impact of the program by 30 June 2013.

Qualitative Deliverable:Implement pilot projects for the delivery of mobile dental services to Indigenous populations in rural and regional areas.
2010-11 Reference Point:Consultation to identify pilot sites completed, and delivery of dental services commenced in a timely manner.
Result: Deliverable met.
Pilot projects for 2010-11 have been implemented consistent with the consultant’s recommendations.

Improve Health Care Services in North-West Tasmania, and Support Other Services

The Australian Government provides funding through an agreement with the Tasmanian Government for the management and operation of the Mersey Community Hospital at Latrobe, to improve health services for the people in the north-west region of Tasmania.

In 2010-11, the department conducted negotiations with the Tasmanian Department of Health and Human Services which led to the Australian Government signing a new agreement with the Tasmanian Government which will provide $197.56 million over three years from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2014, an increase of $17.56 million over the 2008-11 Heads of Agreement. The increased funding will allow the hospital to continue to provide the same level of services and will ensure that integrated care and safe, high quality health services will continue to be provided to residents in the north-west region of Tasmania.

Qualitative Deliverable:Enhanced, safe and sustainable health care services for the people in the north-west region of Tasmania.
2010-11 Reference Point:Effective oversight of funding agreement for the management and operation of Mersey Community Hospital.
Result: Deliverable met.
The Mersey Community Hospital continues to operate in accordance with the agreement between the Australian Government and the Tasmanian Government to ensure that people in the north-west region of Tasmania have access to safe, appropriate and sustainable health care services. The Hospital continues to provide all of the core services that are outlined in the agreement.
Qualitative KPI:Core clinical services that are specified in the Heads of Agreement for the management, operation and funding of the Mersey Community Hospital continue to be provided by the hospital.
2010-11 Reference Point:Analysis of data provided under the Heads of Agreement concludes that the agreed services are being provided.
Result: Indicator met.
Analysis of data provided to the department under the Heads of Agreement confirmed that the agreed services are being provided.
Top of page

Whole of Program Performance Information

Qualitative Deliverable:Produce relevant and timely evidence‑based policy research.
2010-11 Reference Point:Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner.
Result: Deliverable met.
The department provided high quality and timely evidence based research and analysis to inform the Australian Government within the timeframes required. The department also supported the research, consultations and deliberations of the Expert Panel and the establishment of the Lead Clinician Groups initiative.
Qualitative Deliverable:Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues.
2010-11 Reference Point:Stakeholders participated in program development through such avenues as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings.
Result: Deliverable met.
Stakeholders participated in the design and implementation of Lead Clinician Groups through a comprehensive, multi-staged stakeholder engagement and consultation process, which involved a series of written submissions, workshops, targeted interviews and round-table discussions.

The department also provided secretariat support to an Expert Panel review to undertake a broad consultative process that included visits to each jurisdiction to meet with departmental officials and clinicians, a series of consumer focus groups held in metropolitan, regional and rural areas, a peak body consultation forum, and a written submission process.
Quantitative Deliverable:Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses.
2010-11 Target:0.5%2010-11 Actual:-13.5%
Result: Deliverable not met.
Extensive negotiations with the states and territories on the roles of the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority and National Health Performance Authority and the passage of the legislations through Parliament had delayed the establishment of the authorities. The underspend will not impact on the authorities achieving the outcomes.

Top of page

Outcome 13 – Financial Resources Summary

(A) Budget
Estimate1
2010-11
$’000
(B) Actual
2010-11
$’000
Variation
(Column B
minus
Column A)
$’000
Program 13.1: Blood and Organ Donation Services
Administered Expenses
    Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1)
12,865
10,504
(2,361)
    Special appropriations
    National Health Act 1953 - Blood Fractionation, Products and Blood Related Products - to National Blood Authority
613,409
608,868
(4,541)
Departmental Expenses
    Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1)
11,055
10,844
(211)
    Revenues from other sources (s31)
327
307
(20)
    Unfunded depreciation expense
262
331
69
    Operating loss / (surplus)
-
1
1
Total for Program 13.1
637,918
630,855
(7,063)
Program 13.2: Medical Indemnity
Administered Expenses
    Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1)
157
154
(3)
    Special appropriations
    Medical Indemnity Act 2002
108,700
58,610
(50,090)
    Midwife Professional Indemnity
    (Run-off Cover Support payment) Act 2010
5,000
-
(5,000)
    Midwife Professional Indemnity
    (Commonwealth Contribution) Scheme Act 2010
1,709
-
(1,709)
Departmental Expenses
    Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1)
4,204
4,124
(80)
    Revenues from other sources (s31)
124
117
(7)
    Unfunded depreciation expense
100
126
26
    Operating loss / (surplus)
-
-
-
Total for Program 13.2
119,994
63,131
(56,863)
Program 13.3: Public Hospitals and Information
Administered Expenses
    Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1)
95,098
78,455
(16,643)
Departmental Expenses
    Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1)
29,526
28,960
(566)
    Revenues from other sources (s31)
872
820
(52)
    Unfunded depreciation expense
700
883
183
    Operating loss / (surplus)
-
2
2
Total for Program 13.3
126,196
109,120
(17,076)
Outcome 13 Totals by appropriation type
Administered Expenses
    Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1)
108,120
89,113
(19,007)
    Special appropriations
728,818
667,478
(61,340)
    Unfunded Expenses
1,709
-
(1,709)
Departmental Expenses
    Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1)
44,785
43,928
(857)
    Revenues from other sources (s31)
1,323
1,244
(79)
    Unfunded depreciation expense
1,062
1,340
278
    Operating loss / (surplus)
-
3
3
Total expenses for Outcome 13
885,817
803,106
(82,711)
Average Staffing Level (Number)
281
271
(10)

1 Budgeted appropriations taken from the 2011-12 Health and Ageing Portfolio Budget Statements and re-aligned to the 2010-11 outcome structure.

Top of page


126 Available at: www.myhospitals.gov.au
127 AIHW Australian Hospital Statistics 2009-10, p98.
128 Assessment period (twelve months ending 31 December 2011) data will be available by March 2012.
129 Under the ESWLRP, performance data is calculated on a calendar year basis – the figures provided above represent performance in the 2010 calendar year (as per assessment periods 2 and 3 of the ESWLRP). These figures were utilised to calculate 2010-11 reward funding payments. Data for January to June 2011 has not been publicly released and is still subject to assessment by Health Ministers.
130 Available at: www.pc.gov.au/gsp/national-partnership/hospital-health-agreement


Help with accessing large documents

When accessing large documents (over 500 KB in size), it is recommended that the following procedure be used:

  1. Click the link with the RIGHT mouse button
  2. Choose "Save Target As.../Save Link As..." depending on your browser
  3. Select an appropriate folder on a local drive to place the downloaded file

Attempting to open large documents within the browser window (by left-clicking) may inhibit your ability to continue browsing while the document is opening and/or lead to system problems.

Help with accessing PDF documents

To view PDF (Portable Document Format) documents, you will need to have a PDF reader installed on your computer. A number of PDF readers are available through the Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) Web Guide website.


prev page | TOC | next page


Produced by the Portfolio Strategies Division, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.
URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/annrpt/publishing.nsf/Content/annual-report-1011-toc~1011part2~1011part2.4~1011outcome13
If you would like to know more or give us your comments contact: annrep@health.gov.au