You are in:
Improved capacity, quality and mix of the health workforce to meet the requirements of health services, including through training, registration, accreditation and distribution strategies
PDF printable version of Outcome 12 Health Workforce Capacity (PDF 836 KB)
This chapter reports on the major activities undertaken by the department during the year, reporting against each of the major activities and performance indicators published in the Outcome 12 chapter of the 2010-11 Health and Ageing Portfolio Budget Statements (PB Statements) and the 2010-11 Health and Ageing Portfolio Additional Estimates Statements (PAES). It also includes a table summarising the estimated and actual expenditure for this Outcome.
Outcome 12 was managed in 2010-11 by the Health Workforce Division and the Primary and Ambulatory Care Division. The department’s state and territory offices also contributed to the achievement of this Outcome.
| Program Name | Program Objectives in 2010-11 |
|---|---|
| Program 12.1: Rural Workforce |
|
| Program 12.2: Workforce |
|
Since 2002, when the Rural Clinical School Program commenced, there has been a significant increase in the number of graduating medical students who have undertaken at least one year of their clinical training in rural areas – from 115 in 2003 (first full year of operation) to 605 in 2010. An increase in participating universities from ten universities to 17 universities has contributed to this increase. Overall the universities have met or exceeded their target of 25% of Commonwealth supported medical students undertaking long term placements.
Figure 2.4.12.2: University Departments of Rural Health students undertaking two week placements
Between 2003 and 2010 there has been an overall increase in the number of University Departments of Rural Health students undertaking placements of at least two weeks duration.
The Medical Rural Bonded Scholarship Scheme (MRB) is a long-term initiative aimed at improving access to medical services for communities in rural and remote areas of Australia. The scheme provides more than $24,000 a year to participating medical students who commit to working in rural and remote Australia for up to six years once they have completed their medical training as a specialist. In 2010-11, an additional 98 new university medical students accepted a place in the scheme, bringing the total number of participating doctors to 1,062. Since 2010, 13 doctors supported by the scheme commenced their return of service obligation in rural and remote areas.
The Bonded Medical Places Scheme (BMP) is a long-term initiative aimed at increasing the medical workforce in districts of workforce shortage across Australia. In 2010-11, over 700 students accepted the opportunity to study medicine at university through this scheme, bringing the total number of participants to over 3,800. It is expected that doctors supported by the scheme will commence their return of service obligation in 2013, working in districts of workforce shortage for periods of up to six years. The return of service obligation can be reduced by eligible pre-vocational and vocational training and any credit obtained through Scaling.
Scaling is applied to a range of Australian Government programs that have a return of service obligation, including the MRB Scheme and the BMP Scheme. Scaling increases the attractiveness of working in rural areas by fast tracking doctors’ return of service obligation based on the location they are working in. Scaling will apply to MRB and BMP participants once they have gained Fellowship and commenced their ‘return of service period’ (which on average can be 14 years from when participants sign their contract or deed of agreement).
The department also delivered on its commitment to provide 100 additional rural allied health clinical placement scholarships in 2010-11, allowing more allied health students to experience rural based practice. The additional scholarships were fully implemented for 2010-11, with 100 scholarships being offered to students undertaking placements in rural areas.
During 2010-11, the department assessed 10,235 doctors as eligible to receive the new retention payment, which is 7,937 more than the number of practitioners paid in 2009-10 under the previous program. The increase has occurred through the expansion of eligible locations and the introduction of a systems based assessment and payment process. The department received 87 applications for the relocation grant and of these, approved 39 applicants. The total number of approved applications was lower than anticipated due to a number of applicants that failed to meet the eligibility criteria. In 2011-12, the department will continue to monitor uptake of the program, and consider ways to expand awareness in order to increase the number of GPs in regional, rural and remote locations.
| Quantitative KPI: | Number of doctors relocating to rural or remote locations. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 70 | 2010-11 Actual: | 39 |
| Result: Indicator not met. | |||
| The number of successful applications was lower than expected. The department will consider ways to increase uptake to the relocation component of the General Practice Rural Incentives Program in 2011-12. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Number of Registrars remaining in rural and remote locations.114 | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 100 | 2010-11 Actual: | 303 |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| The number of GP Registrars choosing to remain in a regional, rural or remote location at the end of their registrar training has exceeded expectation and provides greater access to primary medical services in these locations. | |||
The department worked with Medicare Australia, Rural Health Workforce Australia, and the Rural Workforce agencies, to develop a database and IT system to assess applications for payments under the General Practice Rural Incentives Program. Medicare Australia’s IT system has also been used to provide incentive payments for the HECS Reimbursement Scheme and the Rural Locum Education Assistance Program. 114
The department’s work with the rural workforce agencies also produced a robust database which has reduced processing times and improved consistency across the states and territories. The database will also free up agency officers to provide them with more time to liaise with medical practitioners and provide individual advice. The database captures information in relation to doctors not billing Medicare.
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of new doctors participating in the General Practice Rural Incentives Program. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 2,200 | 2010-11 Actual: | 7,937 |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| The higher than anticipated participation by doctors on the General Practice Rural Incentives Program has occurred as a result of the automated processing of assessments and payments, and increases to the number of eligible areas. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of new registrars participating in the General Practice Rural Incentives Program from 1 July 2010. | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 250 | 2010-11 Actual: | 137 |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||
| As training places occur across financial years the figures do not include semester one GP Registrars who completed their training placement in August 2011. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Number of participants on the HECS Reimbursement Scheme. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 496 | 2010-11 Actual: | 523 |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| This is a demand driven program – the increase in the number of participants reflects the increasing number of doctors choosing to work in rural and remote areas of Australia during 2010-11, and numbers applying for the program. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Number of GP obstetrician and specialist obstetrician locum placements filled. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 135 | 2010-11 Actual: | 109 |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||
| Accessing an adequate supply of locums with appropriate medical indemnity and the ageing locum workforce has presented some challenges to this program. The department is piloting some additional incentives to expand the locum pool. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Number of days per year locum relief is provided to rural obstetricians.115 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 799 | 2010-11 Actual: | 738 |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||
| It should be noted that most rural obstetricians that participate in this scheme do not use their full subsidised locum allocation. The department is supporting an active strategy to increase awareness of the program. | |||
| Quantitative KPI: | Number of days per year locum relief is provided to rural specialist obstetricians, GP obstetricians and GP anaesthetists.116 | ||
| 2010-11 Target: | 1,125 | 2010-11 Actual: | 946 |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||
| Many rural obstetricians and anaesthetists did not request their full allowance of subsidised locum relief days. The number of days of locum relief is dependant upon the requirements of the rural doctor. The department is supporting an active marketing strategy to increase awareness of the program. | |||
In 2010-11, the department engaged Communio Pty Ltd to undertake an external review of the National Rural Locum Program to consider the effectiveness and efficiency of the three components. 117 The review found that the subsidies provided through the National Rural Locum Program are an appropriate means to provide support for rural doctors and these programs have a high level of client satisfaction.
The department also funds Rural Health Workforce Australia to administer the Rural GP Locum Program to improve the number of GP locum placements and locum services to rural and remote communities. This program has exceeded expectations by achieving 265 targeted GP locum placements and 1,866 locum service days in rural and remote Australia.
The department supports the expansion of urban GP skills for the purpose of complementing rural locum services. During 2010-11, the department reimbursed the costs for urban doctors who undertook emergency medicine training in exchange for a commitment to four weeks rural locum service. The provision of locum services to rural doctors helps to maintain and improve access to quality medical care in rural communities whilst at the same time giving rural doctors a much needed break.
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of Allied Health Locum Placements. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 100 | 2010-11 Actual: | 0 |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| During 2010-11, the department appointed an administrator for the Rural Allied Health Locum Scheme and worked with that organisation to develop program guidelines for the operation of the scheme. Extended negotiations with the preferred administrator were required to ensure an effective program model was implemented. Due to the delays, the 2010-11 placements were not filled, with placements commencing in July 2011. However, increased target numbers over the next three years will ensure the overall target of 400 placements will be met during 2011-12 to 2013-14. Ongoing information activities are underway to accelerate the filling of locum placements. | |||
In 2010-11, the department appointed an administrator to establish and manage the Nursing Rural Locum Scheme. The scheme will provide locum placements to enable nurses and midwives in rural and remote locations to take leave and undertake continuing professional development activities without adversely affecting service delivery. It will also allow interested nurses and midwives to experience rural based practice through locum placement. Locum placements were arranged during 2010-11 and commenced in July 2011.
| Quantitative KPI: | Number of nurse locums under the Nursing Rural Locum Scheme. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 750 | 2010-11 Actual: | 0 |
| Result: Indicator not met. | |||
| During 2010-11, the department appointed an administrator for the Nursing Rural Locum Scheme and worked with that organisation to develop program guidelines for the operation of the scheme. The appointment was delayed due to extended negotiations being required to ensure an effective program was implemented. Due to the delays, the 750 locum placements for 2010-11 will be filled over future years, ensuring that a total of 3,000 placements are provided over the years 2011-12 to 2013-14. | |||
In 2010, University Departments of Rural Health supported 4,609 clinical placements of at least two weeks duration. The Dental Training Expanding Rural Placements Program supported 191 clinical placements of three to six weeks duration. In the Rural Clinical Schools Program, 1,009 medical students did long-term placements, on an average of one year, in a rural setting. The John Flynn Placement Program provided 900 students with the opportunity to work with doctors in rural communities for two weeks. The program is expanding and in 2011, 1,050 students will be offered placements in a rural community.
The department also delivered on its commitment to provide 100 additional rural allied health clinical placement scholarships in 2010-11, allowing more allied health students to experience rural based practice. The additional scholarships were fully implemented for 2010-11, with 100 scholarships being offered to students undertaking placements in rural areas. The average placement time is four weeks.
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of Rural Placements by University Departments of Rural Health.121 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 3,300 | 2010-11 Actual: | 4,609 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| University Departments of Rural Health training placements are reported on a calendar year basis, rather than by financial year. In 2010, 4,609 clinical placements of at least two weeks duration were supported, exceeding the program target of 3,300. | |||
These initiatives provide a long-term solution to rural health workforce development, while also offering an immediate benefit to people living in rural Australia. Access to health care in communities with a Rural Clinical School or a University Department of Rural Health has generally improved, due to the retention of existing health professionals and the recruitment of new health professionals to these regions due to the presence of a major training provider.
| Quantitative KPI: | Percentage of medical students participating in the Rural Clinical Schools Program. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | ≥25% | 2010-11 Actual: | 30% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| Rural Clinical School placements are reported on a calendar year basis rather than by financial year. In 2010, the program target was exceeded, with 30% of Australian medical graduates (at participating universities with operational rural clinical schools) completing at least one year of rural training. | |||
In 2010-11, the Rural Education Infrastructure Development Pool continued to support new projects such as rural education centres and student accommodation in all states and the Northern Territory. Since the establishment of the Rural Education Infrastructure Development Pool in 2009-10, a total of 30 new projects have been approved. Many of these projects will be completed during 2011-12 and the department will work to ensure these initiatives provide high quality clinical training experiences for students of medicine, nursing and allied health in rural and remote Australia.
The Rural Health Continuing Education Sub-program provides support and continuing professional development for health professionals in rural and remote communities. The program also provides a coordinated approach to issues of professional isolation. In 2010, 12 project grants and 23 individual grants were approved under Stream One for medical specialists and 15 project grants and five individual grants were approved under Stream Two for allied health professionals, nurses, general practitioners and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Workers.
| Quantitative KPI: | Number of GPs supported to maintain procedural skills under the Rural Procedural Grants program. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 1,780 | 2010-11 Actual: | 1,633 |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||
| The figure is based on unique participants. Doctors access both the emergency training component and procedural GP up-skilling. The Rural Procedural Grants program reached 91.7% of its target and achieved a 5.2% increase in the number of unique participants from 2009-10. Activity will continue to raise the profile of this program. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Produce relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department continued to provide timely evidence-based policy research and advice through a number of avenues in 2010-11. | |
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues. |
|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholders participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| In 2010-11, the department consulted with stakeholders to develop the new funding agreements, ongoing operational issues, capital works, reporting and outcomes. Participating universities were consulted on the merger of the Rural Clinical Schools and Rural Undergraduate Support and Coordination Programs to form the Rural Clinical Training and Support Program.
The department also worked with a number of stakeholders associated with the delivery of programs for rural doctors, including: Rural Health Workforce Australia and Rural Workforce Agencies; General Practice Education and Training; the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners; the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine; and Medicare Australia. | |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2010-11 Actual: | 2.1% |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| Program 12.1 was overspent by 2.1%. This was due to movements in demand driven sub-programs, under the Rural Workforce Program, resulting in a net overspend. | |||
The department worked with states and territories and the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency to support the introduction of the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme (NRAS) for health professions which came into effect on 1 July 2010. NRAS currently includes ten health professions: medicine, nursing and midwifery, pharmacy, physiotherapy, psychology, osteopathy, chiropractic, optometry, podiatry and dental care (including dentists, dental hygienists, dental therapists and dental prosthetists). An additional four professions (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health practitioners, Chinese medicine, medical radiation practice and occupational therapy) will be included in the NRAS from 1 July 2012.
The department worked with Health Workforce Australia (HWA) on the implementation of health workforce planning and reform activities throughout 2010-11. HWA is an initiative of the Council of Australian Governments and was established to meet the future challenges of providing a health workforce that responds to the needs of the Australian community. HWA operates across the health and education sectors to address Australia’s critical health workforce planning, training and reform priorities. HWA will facilitate more effective and integrated clinical training for health professionals, provide effective and accurate information and advice to guide health workforce policy and planning, and promote, support and evaluate health workforce reform.
Overseas trained doctors and foreign graduates of an accredited medical school are generally subject to ten years of restricted practice under Section 19AB of the Health Insurance Act 1973. Through the scaling incentive, overseas trained doctors and foreign graduates of an accredited medical school can now reduce the ten year moratorium if they practise in a regional, rural or remote location. Since the commencement of the incentive on 1 July 2010, an average 1,991 doctors are receiving the benefit each month.
In 2010-11, the department in conjunction with Medicare Australia, implemented an IT system to identify, track and scale eligible participants and apply a scaling incentive. The department has used fact sheets, conference packages, a dedicated website 122 and email enquiry line, to inform participants of the available incentives.
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of overseas trained doctors to reduce ‘return of service’ obligations through the Scaling of Rural Workforce programs incentive. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 6,450 | 2010-11 Actual: | 2,147123 | ||
| Result: Indicator not met. | |||||
| Service records are assessed each month and scaling benefits applied for doctors who were eligible for the incentive during that period. In 2010-11, 100% of eligible doctors received an incentive for their work in regional or remote Australia. Scaling is not applied for overseas trained doctors who practise in major cities or who do not meet the eligibility criteria. | |||||
| Quantitative KPI: | Increased number of suitably qualified overseas trained doctors.124 | ||||
| 2010-11 Target: | 104 | 2010-11 Actual: | 98 | ||
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||||
| In 2010-11, 98 overseas trained doctors were recruited under the International Recruitment Strategy. The program reached 94% of its target which was an increase of 92% on the previous year. | |||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander outreach workers who have commenced orientation or training programs.125 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Target: | 90% | 2010-11 Actual: | 79% |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| Eighty-four of 107 Outreach Workers received orientation. This was due to some Outreach Workers being recruited later in the financial year and therefore not all were in a position to receive orientation by 30 June 2011. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Produce relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner. | |||
| Result: Deliverable met. | ||||
| The department commissioned the National Centre for Social Applications of Geographical Information Systems to study the impact of the independent remoteness classification system, the Australian Standard Geographic Classification – Remoteness Areas, on the various measures under the Rural Health Workforce Strategy. | ||||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues. | |||
| 2010-11 Reference Point: | Stakeholders participated in program development through avenues such as regular consultative committees, conferences, stakeholder engagement forums, surveys, submissions on departmental discussion papers and meetings. | |||
| Result: Deliverable met. | ||||
| In 2010-11, the department worked with a number of stakeholders associated with the delivery of incentives for rural doctors, including Rural Health Workforce Australia and Medicare Australia. | ||||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | |||
| 2010-11 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2010-11 Actual: | -0.6% | |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | ||||
| Program 12.2 was underspent by 0.6%. The programs contributing to the underspend were the Personal Care Workers Program, which requires further negotiation with stakeholders before implementation; and the Rural Education Infrastructure Development Program, where extended negotiation with stakeholders resulted in some slippage. | ||||
(A) Budget Estimate1 2010-11 $’000 | (B) Actual 2010-11 $’000 | Variation (Column B minus Column A) $’000 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Program 12.1: Rural Workforce | |||
| |||
| 250,090 | 255,418 | 5,328 |
| |||
| 12,047 | 11,944 | (103) |
| 240 | 213 | (27) |
| 325 | 387 | 62 |
| - | 1 | 1 |
| Total for Program 12.1 | 262,702 | 267,963 | 5,261 |
| Program 12.2: Workforce | |||
| |||
| 451,829 | 449,298 | (2,531) |
| |||
| 13,086 | 12,974 | (112) |
| 261 | 231 | (30) |
| 353 | 421 | 68 |
| - | 1 | 1 |
| Total for Program 12.2 | 465,529 | 462,925 | (2,604) |
| Outcome 12 Totals by appropriation type | |||
| |||
| 701,919 | 704,716 | 2,797 |
| |||
| 25,133 | 24,918 | (215) |
| 501 | 444 | (57) |
| 678 | 808 | 130 |
| - | 2 | 2 |
| Total expenses for Outcome 12 | 728,231 | 730,888 | 2,657 |
| Average Staffing Level (Number) | 184 | 187 | 3 |
1 Budgeted appropriations taken from the 2011-12 Health and Ageing Portfolio Budget Statements and re-aligned to the 2010-11 outcome structure. | |||
114 By transitioning to the GP component under the General Practice Rural Incentives Program.
115 The ‘number of days per year locum relief’ for rural obstetricians includes multi-site placements.
116 The ‘number of days per year locum relief’ for rural specialist obstetricians, GP obstetricians and GP anaesthetists includes multi-site placements.
117 The three components are: the Specialist Obstetrician Locum Scheme; the GP Anaesthetist Locum Scheme; and the Rural GP Locum Scheme.
118 Australian National University, Deakin University, Flinders University, James Cook University, Monash University, University of Adelaide, University of Melbourne, University of Notre Dame Australia, University of Newcastle, University of New South Wales, University of Queensland, University of Sydney, University of Tasmania, University of Western Sydney, University of Wollongong.
119 Flinders University (Alice Springs and Warrnambool), James Cook University, Monash University, University of Melbourne, University of Newcastle, University of South Australia, University of Sydney (Broken Hill and Lismore), University of Tasmania, University of Western Australia.
120 University of Melbourne, University of Sydney, University of Western Australia, University of Queensland, Griffith University, University of Adelaide.
121 The average placement time is four weeks.
122 Available at: www.doctorconnect.gov.au
123 This figure is an estimate and is based on the month (March 2011) when the highest number of doctors received a benefit. Scaling is applied for each month of eligible services. Therefore, doctors may be eligible one month and not the next. In 2010-11, an average 1,991 doctors received the benefit each month. It is not possible to show a yearly figure.
124 Overseas trained doctors working in outer metropolitan, rural and remote districts of workforce shortage.
When accessing large documents (over 500 KB in size), it is recommended that the following procedure be used:
Attempting to open large documents within the browser window (by left-clicking)
may inhibit your ability to continue browsing while the document is
opening and/or lead to system problems.
To view PDF (Portable Document Format) documents, you will need to have a PDF reader installed on your computer. A number of PDF readers are available through the Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) Web Guide website.
Produced by the Portfolio Strategies Division, Australian
Government Department of Health and Ageing.
URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/annrpt/publishing.nsf/Content/annual-report-1011-toc~1011part2~1011part2.4~1011outcome12
If you would like to know more or give us your comments contact: annrep@health.gov.au