You are in:
A reduction in the incidence and consequence of hearing loss, including through research and prevention activities, and access to hearing services and devices for eligible people.
1 Further information can be found at www.health.gov.au/hear or on telephone 1800 500 726 or telephone typewriter (TTY) 1800 500 496.
2 Available at www.psychology.ecu.edu.au/staff/cv/chang_p.php.
| Improve the Quality of Hearing Services | |
|---|---|
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Regular stakeholder participation in program development occurs through a range of avenues such as surveys, committees, meetings, and submissions in departmental discussion papers. Stakeholders are also supported under the program through access to a call centre, and written communication and publications to provide information about the program. The 2009 Client Satisfaction Survey is due to be published by February 2010. |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |
| In 2009-10, the department consulted with clients, the hearing services industry, hearing services and medical professional bodies and consumer representative organisations in relation to the clinical pathway proposals, the Minimum Hearing Loss Threshold and practitioner registration matters, through meetings, electronic bulletins and invitations for feedback. A specific information technology forum for service providers, which met regularly, was also established to look at information technology issues and further system improvements. The Client Satisfaction Survey was reviewed for purpose and content, leading to the development of a new survey instrument. As a result of this activity, the conduct of the survey was delayed until June 2010. | |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2009-10 Actual: | -0.8% |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| The Australian Government Hearing Services program is a demand driven program. In 2009-10, the variance between actual expenses and budgeted expenses was -0.8 per cent. The variance reflects the demand driven nature of the program. | |||
| Improve the Quality of Hearing Services | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of sites registered to provide services under the Hearing Services program. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 2,000 | Actual: 2009-10 | 2,131 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| As at 30 June 2010, there were 2,131 sites registered under the Australian Government Hearing Services program. This compares with 2,037 sites in 2008-09 and 1,963 sites in 2007-08. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of people receiving hearing services. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 572,224 | Actual: 2009-10 | 568,293 |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| A total of 568,293 clients accessed Voucher and Community Service Obligations services in 2009-10. This compares with 541,883 clients in 2008-09 and 498,555 clients in 2007-08. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of clients accessing rehabilitation services. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 2,270 | Actual: 2009-10 | 3,154 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The number of clients accessing rehabilitation services in 2009-10 was 3,154. This exceeds the expected rate by 884 services and is a result of promoting the services to the service providers. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | The percentage of contracted service providers audited to ensure the quality of service provision and compliance with legislation. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 20% | 2009-10 Actual: | 17% |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| During 2009-10, the department moved from cyclical audits to targeted risk-based audits. Consequently, the 2009-10 target was substantially met with 17 per cent of contracted service providers audited. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | The number and percentage of qualified practitioners reviewed and/or monitored to ensure the quality of service provision and compliance with legislation. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 269 (20%) | 2009-10 Actual: | 450 (34%) |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2009-10, 450 qualified practitioners were reviewed, representing 34 per cent of all qualified practitioners. This compares with 385 practitioner audits undertaken in 2008-09. | |||
| Improve the Quality of Hearing Services | |
|---|---|
| Qualitative Indicator: | Consultation with providers regarding their direct experiences in the delivery of rehabilitation services, and their assessment of the level of confidence with which they deliver these services, will provide a qualitative measure of how well providers are delivering this service. This will be matched with feedback from consumers obtained through client surveys. |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |
| The department completed consultations with service providers to collect feedback and provide advice on the delivery of rehabilitation services. While, as a result of this activity the uptake in Rehabilitation Plus increased, uptake is still low and the program will be reviewed in 2010-11. | |
| Improve the Quality of Hearing Services | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Indicator: | Average number of working days taken to issue vouchers to eligible clients. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 14 | 2009-10 Actual: | 17.7 |
| Result: Indicator not met. | |||
| Due to the increases in the number of voucher requests received and the number of calls made to the Hearing Services Client Contact Line, the average processing time was more than the target of 14 days. The average processing time peaked at 38 working days in March 2010. The department managed to reduce the average processing time to 8.5 days by June 2010. The rate of increase for voucher requests in 2009-10 was 13.7 per cent. This trend continues from 2008-09 and 2007-08 where, in both years, this indicator was not met. In 2009-10, the department commenced a review of its administrative processes and as a result, redirected resources to applications processing to enable it to better meet published targets. |
|||
| Quantitative Indicator: | Increased usage of hearing devices for the Rehabilitation Plus population compared with clients who have not received these services (commences July 2009). | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 60% | 2009-10 Actual: | 57% |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||
| Use of hearing devices for the Rehabilitation Plus population was not as high as estimated. A survey of providers’ views and perceptions on Rehabilitation Plus will be undertaken in 2010-11. Trend data cannot be reported for this indicator as it was a new indicator for the 2009-10 Portfolio Budget Statements. |
|||
| Quantitative Indicator: | Maintain or increase the percentage of fitted clients who use their device(s) for 5 or more hours per day. |
||
| 2009-10 Target: | 56% | 2009-10 Actual: | 63% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| The results of the annual client survey, undertaken in June 2010 indicated that approximately 291,392 clients (63 per cent of fitted voucher clients) were using their devices for more than five hours per day. This measure indicates the proportion of fitted clients who gain a significant benefit from their devices, but is not comparable with the indicator of the usage of hearing devices for the Rehabilitation Plus population, as it includes a wider population of clients using their devices over a longer period. | |||
| (A) Budget Estimate 2009-10 $’000 |
(B) Actual 2009-10 $’000 | Variation (Column B minus Column A) $’000 |
Budget Estimate 2010-11 $’000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program 7.1: Hearing Services | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 345,477 | 342,691 | ( 2,786) | 357,766 |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 9,224 | 9,792 | 568 | 7,809 |
| Revenues from other sources | 140 | 192 | 52 | 147 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense1 | - | - | - | 184 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 5 | 5 | - |
| Total for Program 7.1 | 354,841 | 352,680 | ( 2,161) | 365,906 |
| Outcome 7 Totals by appropriation type | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 345,477 | 342,691 | ( 2,786) | 357,766 |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 9,224 | 9,792 | 568 | 7,809 |
| Revenues from other sources | 140 | 192 | 52 | 147 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense1 | - | - | - | 184 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 5 | 5 | - |
| Total Expenses for Outcome 7 | 354,841 | 352,680 | ( 2,161) | 365,906 |
| Average Staffing Level (Number) | 67 | 68 | 1 | 63 |
1 Reflects the change to net cash appropriation framework implemented from 2010-11.
Produced by the Portfolio Strategies Division, Australian
Government Department of Health and Ageing.
URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/annrpt/publishing.nsf/Content/annual-report-0910-toc~0910-2~0910-2-3~0910-2-3-7
If you would like to know more or give us your comments contact: annrep@health.gov.au