You are in:
Access to quality and affordable aged care and carer support services for older people, including through subsidies and grants, industry assistance, training and regulation of the aged care sector.
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Regular stakeholder participation in program development through avenues such as surveys, conferences, meetings, and submissions on departmental discussion papers measured by the extent to which the department works with the Aged Care Assessment Program (ACAP) Officials (the peak Australian, state and territory government level committee that oversees the operation of the program), and the department’s hosting of the 2010 Aged Care Assessment Program National Conference. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| In 2009-10, the department worked collaboratively with Aged Care Assessment Program Officials to develop policy and program improvements with a focus on improving the timeliness, consistency and quality of assessments conducted by Aged Care Assessment Teams. The department also hosted the National Aged Care Assessment Program Conference at the Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre on 20-21 May 2010. The conference provided approximately 600 representatives from across Australia with an opportunity to share their expertise, explore new ideas and review best practice. The theme of the conference was: Respect, Recognition and Responsibilities, with guest speakers including the Hon Justine Elliot MP, Minister for Ageing; Dr Anna Howe, Consultant Gerontologist; Merle Mitchell, Community Advocate; and many others. Presentations from the conference are available online.1 |
|
1 Accessible at www.health.gov.au/acats.
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2009-10 Actual: | -23.3% |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| The National ACAP conference in May 2010 was conducted for a significantly lower cost than originally estimated. | |||
| Equitable Access to Assessments of the Care Needs of Frail Older People | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of all complete assessments which were performed by the Aged Care Assessment Teams on clients in the target population. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 85% | 2009-10 Actual: | 92.3% |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2009-10, projected figures based on the 1 July to 31 December 2009 data indicate that 92.3 per cent of all complete assessments undertaken by Aged Care Assessment Teams were for the target population. South Australia had the highest proportion of assessments from the target population with 93.6 per cent, while the Northern Territory the lowest with 87.7 per cent. All states and territories are projected to meet the 2009-10 target of 85 per cent. The data was for the period 1 July 2009 to 31 December 2009. Final data for 2009-10 will be available in the ACAP MDS Annual Report 2009-2010 in March 2011 and will be published on the department’s website www.health.gov.au/acats |
|||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of Aged Care Assessment Team delegates who have successfully completed the knowledge assessment component of the delegation training. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 100% | 2009-10 Actual: | 80.4% |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| In April 2009, the department introduced a new national training resource for Aged Care Assessment Team delegates using a range of training formats, including an online learning management system. Take-up of this training by delegates has been gradually increasing since April 2009. In 2009-10, 80.4 per cent of delegates successfully completed the knowledge assessment component of the delegation training. The department will require that states and territories ensure all Aged Care Assessment Team delegates complete this training in 2010-11. |
|||
| Qualitative Indicator: | All states and territories have improved timeliness of assessments of older people in community, residential, and hospital settings. This will be measured using the data collated at the National Data Repository on the Aged Care Assessment Program Minimum Data Set. Each state and territory government is required to provide data on each Aged Care Assessment Team in accordance with the requirements set out in the National Partnership Agreement and relevant department guidelines on the Aged Care Assessment Program Minimum Data Set. Based on the information from the Minimum Data Set, baseline targets for Aged Care Assessment Teams will be established in 2009-10. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| All states and territories provide data on each Aged Care Assessment Team. Baseline targets for the performance of each Aged Care Assessment Team are established using the Aged Care Assessment Program Minimum Data Set. The requirement for timely assessments of older people in all settings (community, residential and hospital) will be measured in line with the key performance indicators in the Aged Care Assessment Program Implementation Plan. | |
| Equitable Access to Assessments of the Care Needs of Frail Older People | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Indicator: | Percentage of older people in the target population prioritised as being at the highest level of need for assessment seen within 48 hours of referral. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 85% | 2009-10 Actual: | Data not available until December 2010 |
| Result: Cannot be reported. | |||
| In 2008-09, 80.9 per cent of the highest priority older people were assessed within 48 hours of referral. The target of 85 per cent was only met by New South Wales (86.0 per cent), Victoria (90.5 per cent), the Northern Territory (86.4 per cent) and the Australian Capital Territory (95.7 per cent). The target was not met by South Australia (68.0 per cent), Tasmania (75.7 per cent) and Queensland (84.3 per cent).
The data was extracted on 17 June 2010 from the Ageing and Aged Care Data Warehouse and is for the period of 2008-09. Data will be revised when 2009-10 data is available in December 2010 and may alter the information in the graph. |
|||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Regular stakeholder participation in program development, through surveys, conferences, meetings, and submissions on departmental discussion papers. This will be measured by the extent to which the department works with the Aged Care Workforce Committee as the primary stakeholder forum for aged care workforce and training policy discussions. The Aged Care Workforce Committee advises the Australian Government on aged care workforce challenges, issues and trends. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| In 2009-10, the Aged Care Workforce Committee formally met three times and provided feedback and advice out of session. The department provided regular updates to the Aged Care Workforce Committee on workforce programs. The Aged Care Workforce Committee facilitates partnerships and discussion between the aged care sector and the workforce education and training industry. In 2009-10, the committee provided advice to identify national workforce goals and took part in discussions regarding workforce training models, including future directions. |
|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2009-10 Actual: | -4.9% |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| In 2009-10, the department had an underspend for this deliverable due largely to the lower than expected take-up of the Bringing Nurses Back to the Workforce program. | |||
| Improving Quality of Care by Improving the Skills of the Workforce | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of training places funded for aged care workers. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 8,200 | 2009-10 Actual: | 9,028 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2009–10, the department entered into arrangements with registered training organisations to deliver more than 9,000 training places across its aged care workforce programs through regular competitive funding rounds. These programs aim to increase the skills of aged care workers in eligible residential and community aged care services, including those in rural and remote Australia that face additional workforce challenges. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of scholarships funded for aged care nurses. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 445 | 2009-10 Actual: | 716 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2009-10, the department, through the Royal College of Nursing Australia, delivered 716 aged care nursing scholarships. The scholarships were awarded for undergraduate and postgraduate studies to support the aged care sector to attract and retain nurses and to improve the clinical skills of aged care nurses. These scholarships were targeted at workers with an interest, aptitude and employment history in aged care, to maximise retention in the sector. | |||
| Qualitative Indicator: | The quality of each project under the Encouraging Best Practice in Residential Aged Care program will be evaluated through an ongoing national evaluation framework. |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |
| A national evaluation is underway and is considering all Round 1 and Round 2 projects as well as the effectiveness of the program overall. Evaluation progress reports have been received throughout 2009-10, and a final report will be received following the completion of Round 2 projects in November 2010. | |
| Improving Quality of Care by Improving the Skills of the Workforce | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Indicator: | Improve the skills of aged care workers to deliver high quality care. Measured by the percentage of aged care worker training places taken up. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 100% | 2009-10 Actual: | 100% + additional places |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| In 2009–10, the department entered into arrangements with registered training organisations to deliver more than 9,000 training places across its Aged Care Workforce programs. This was higher than anticipated. The places awarded included 4,037 short course training places, 4,044 accredited Certificate training places, and 947 enrolled nurse and medication management training places. | |||
| Quantitative Indicator: | Improve the skills of aged care nurses. Measured by the percentage of scholarships taken up. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 100% | 2009-10 Actual: | 100% + additional scholarships |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| During 2009-10, the department offered 716 aged care nursing scholarships, comprising 354 undergraduate and 362 postgraduate scholarships. More scholarships were offered than anticipated, and provided aged care workers with the opportunity to become registered nurses or to further develop their clinical skills to deliver quality care. | |||
| Quantitative Indicator: | Number of nurses returning to the aged care workforce. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 300 | 2009-10 Actual: | 83 |
| Result: Indicator not met. | |||
| In 2009-10, 83 nurses returned to work in residential aged care and were assessed as being eligible to receive cash bonuses under the Bringing Nurses Back to the Workforce program. The take-up of this initiative was slower than anticipated and therefore, in 2010-11 funds from this program were redirected as part of a restructure of aged care workforce programs. This will support broader nursing initiatives to encourage nurses to work in aged care. | |||
2 Available at www.agedcareaustralia.gov.au and 1800 500 853, or 1800 555 677 (TTY).
3 Available at www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/ageing-resid-care-fin-data.htm.
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Regular stakeholder participation in program development, through avenues such as surveys, conferences, stakeholder consultation forums, and submissions on departmental discussion papers. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| In 2009-10, there were two meetings of the Ageing Consultative Committee and two meetings of the Aged Care Funding Instrument Industry Reference Group. The department undertook a comprehensive review of the Aged Care Funding Instrument, and considered 98 formal submissions from industry. The department will report the results of the review to Government in early 2010-11. An independent review of the Aged Care Complaints Investigation Scheme was conducted in 2009-10. The reviewers consulted with aged care recipients, their families and carers, the aged care industry, the Ageing Consultative Committee, and other stakeholders on ways to improve the scheme. A total of 119 submissions were received in response to the review. Further consultation will occur during 2010-11 and these consultations will inform the implementation of enhancements to the scheme. |
|
| Information Services for Consumers and Industry | |
|---|---|
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Development of a web-based source of information for consumers on the quality of aged care homes in 2009-10. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| To help consumers assess the quality of homes, the department updated the website each week to show compliance action taken against aged care homes and/or providers of those services. | |
| Maintaining Quality by Taking Action on Consumer Feedback | |
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Timely investigation of concerns raised about the care or services provided in Australian Government subsidised aged care homes indicated by factors such as consumer satisfaction with the Aged Care Complaints Investigation Scheme. |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |
| In 2009-10, the department investigated 8,055 complaints and distributed approximately 16,000 satisfaction surveys to complainants, aged care homes and/or the providers of those services. Feedback showed 76.1 per cent of complainants were either highly satisfied or satisfied that staff of the scheme responded to their complaint in a timely manner, although the independent review identified that high case loads contributed to a lack of timeliness in some investigations. |
|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2009-10 Actual: | -0.6% |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| Minor underspend is a result of small variations in demand and cost. | |||
| Information Services for Consumers and Industry | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of calls made to the Aged Care Information Line. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 104,500 | 2009-10 Actual: | 103,341 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The March 2008 residential fee changes and the introduction of the Aged Care Funding Instrument resulted in an average rise in queries of about four per cent over the two previous financial years. The variance of one per cent in 2009-10 is a natural decrease, as information on fees continues to reach ageing and aged care consumers, care providers and health professionals. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Average number of searches per month on the Aged Care Australia website in the Home Finder section. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 12,500 | 2009-10 Actual: | 21,519 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2009-10, the continuing trend of a 90 per cent or greater increase in Home Finder searches indicates that online resources are becoming more accessible and better known. Website addresses and information line telephone numbers are now prominent in contact information, driving a move to greater choice in information channels. The Aged Care Home Finder is an online search facility that enables people to look for Australian Government-funded aged care homes that meet their particular needs. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Average number of searches per month on the Aged Care Australia website in the Community Care section. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 1,600 | 2009-10 Actual: | 3,220 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The significant number of searches each month for 2009-10 reflects the increased use of this online resource to assist consumers in making informed decisions. | |||
| Information and Support for Care Recipients and Carers | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centres client episodes (current funding arrangements end in 2010-11). | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 200,000 | 2009-10 Actual: | 209,028 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| This number represents the number of times that carers were assisted by a Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centre. It includes telephone calls, emails, facsimiles and visits to a centre. A carer may have been helped more than once in this period. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of searches on the Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centre website. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 246,000 | 2009-10 Actual: | 155,700 |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| The target of 246,000 was based on incorrect data. Searches on the Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centre website in 2007-08 were 201,810, and in 2008-09 were 209,301. Fluctuations in numbers accessing the website can occur for a number of reasons, including the level of promotional activity undertaken by the centres. The department does not direct the range and level of promotional activity that centres undertake from year to year. The overall level of information provided to carers in 2009-10 has been maintained through the items distributed under the Carer Information Support Program which increased from 276,000 in 2008-09 to 374,695 in 2009-10. | |||
| Qualitative Indicator: | Program effectiveness is determined through consultation with key stakeholders, including consumers and industry. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The Ageing Consultative Committee and the Aged Care Funding Instrument Industry Reference Group both met according to committee governance arrangements. The Aged Care Funding Instrument Technical Working Group (a sub-committee of the Aged Care Funding Instrument Industry Reference Group) met more regularly to discuss technical issues arising from the review and was instrumental in advising the department on technical issues related to care and the care needs of residents in Residential Aged Care Facilities. |
|
| Maintaining Quality by Taking Action on Consumer Feedback | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Indicator: | Percentage of people contacting the Aged Care Complaints Investigation Scheme who are satisfied with the effectiveness of the investigation process. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 75% | 2009-10 Actual: | 79.2% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| In 2009-10, the department investigated 8,055 complaints and distributed approximately 16,000 satisfaction surveys to complainants, aged care homes and/or the providers of those services. Feedback showed that 79.2 per cent of consumers who completed the survey were either highly satisfied or satisfied overall with the way the scheme handled their complaint. However, the independent review identified options to improve the scheme which are being considered. |
|||
| Quantitative Indicator: | Percentage of client feedback expressing satisfaction with the services delivered under the National Aged Care Advocacy Program. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 80% | 2009-10 Actual: | 94.8% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| During 2009-10, National Aged Care Advocacy Program organisations achieved a range of between 71 per cent and 100 per cent satisfaction for the Advocacy Assistance Surveys and between 73 per cent and 100 per cent for the Education Session Surveys. | |||
4 Available at www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/hacc-mds.htm.
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Timely production of evidence-based policy research: A range of improvement and reform work will be funded through the various community care programs and will be informed by research where required. Approaches to this work will include consumer research, literature reviews, evaluation of field trials and demonstration projects. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| During 2009-10, the department evaluated a trial involving the establishment of access points which are designed to provide consumers with a range of aged care information from the one place. The results are still being assessed. During the year, the department held discussions, primarily with providers of community care, with a view to developing a trial of an electronic platform to support improved assessments of care eligibility. | |
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Regular stakeholder participation in program development will continue through avenues such as surveys, conferences, meetings, and submissions on departmental discussion papers. In addition Community Care Program initiatives are reviewed and improved as required. Where such work is underway, the department consults with a range of stakeholders through formal and informal mechanisms, which include cross-Government committees, other committees, working groups, consumer research activities, census processes and trials. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department held biannual meetings with state and territory representatives to discuss a range of community care issues including program management and the collection of data. The outcomes of these meetings were taken into consideration when planning the delivery of aged care services to particular states and territories as well as special needs groups identified under the Aged Care Act 1997. | |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2009-10 Actual: | -0.8% |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| The variation can be attributed to some projects with state and territory governments being put on hold while the Council of Australian Governments considered the roles and responsibilities of the Australian Government and state and territory governments in the delivery of community care programs in April 2010. | |||
| Care for People in the Community | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Estimated number of Community Aged Care Packages allocated. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 43,128 | 2009-10 Actual: | 42,728 |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| As at 30 June 2010, there were 42,728 Community Aged Care Packages allocated nationally. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of Home and Community Care Services provided to eligible5 clients in the community. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 2.076 million | 2009-10 Actual: | 2.146 million |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| Home and Community Care services are provided by state and territory governments with funding shared between the states and territories, and the Australian Government. | |||
| Respite and Carers | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of respite services provided to eligible clients in the community. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 84,000 | 2009-10 Actual: | 143,387 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2009-10, some 143,387 carers were provided with assistance through the National Respite for Carers Program. This figure includes 37,076 carers assisted with respite through respite services; 100,273 carers assisted to receive respite through Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centres and 6,038 carers who received counselling services. This is an increase of 12 per cent from 2008-09. Respite services funded under the National Respite for Carers Program provided approximately 5,120,588 hours of respite in 2009-10. This was delivered through over 650 respite services in a variety of settings, including day respite in community settings, in the home and in respite cottages. |
|||
| Targeted Initiatives to Maintain Independent, Active and Healthy Lives | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Provision of information and support through the National Continence Helpline. Measured by the number of calls received. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 20,000 | 2009-10 Actual: | 25,754 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| This deliverable was exceeded due to the introduction of the new Continence Aids Payment Scheme and a significant increase in the level of support offered to the public through the National Continence Helpline. It is notable that not only did the volume of calls increase for the helpline, the range of advice and assistance required was expanded to better communicate and educate the public on the new scheme. Helpline data showed:
|
|||
| Indigenous Community Care Workforce Development | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Total number of paid positions for Indigenous workers in community care. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≥600 | 2009-10 Actual: | >700 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department funded more than 700 permanent part-time positions in community aged care services nationally. Funding for these positions includes award wages and access to superannuation and leave entitlements. The department developed and implemented training initiatives and other workforce supports to improve the retention of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander workers in these positions. | |||
5 Eligibility for services is outlined in the National Program Guidelines for the Home and Community Care Program 2007.
| Care for People in the Community | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Indicator: | Increase in the number of eligible care recipients provided with Community Aged Care Packages, as measured by the percentage increase to the previous financial year’s allocations. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 8.2% | 2009-10 Actual: | 0.1% |
| Result: Indicator not met. | |||
| The 2009-10 Aged Care Approvals Round was still being assessed at 30 June 2010; therefore it has not been possible to take Community Aged Care Package growth stemming from this process into account in the number allocated in 2009-10. In 2009-10, there were an additional 34 Community Aged Care Packages allocated nationally. This represents a 0.1 per cent increase from 2008-09. | |||
| Targeted Initiatives to Maintain Independent, Active and Healthy Lives | |||
| Quantitative Indicator: | Increase in the number of calls received through the National Continence Managed Helpline, as measured by the percentage increase on 18,000 calls to the helpline. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 5% | 2009-10 Actual: | 15.7% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| This indicator was exceeded due to the introduction of the new Continence Aids Payment Scheme and a significant increase in the level of support offered to the public through the National Continence Helpline. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Regular stakeholder participation in program development, through such avenues as surveys, conferences, meetings, and submissions on departmental discussion papers. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| In 2009-10, the organisations funded under the Partners in Culturally Appropriate Care program continued to be regularly engaged through teleconferences and an annual face-to-face meeting to assist in managing challenges and opportunities in assisting approved providers to provide culturally appropriate care. Work on improving support to provide culturally appropriate care will continue in 2010-11 through this network. | |
| Culturally Appropriate Aged Care Services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People | |
|---|---|
| Qualitative Deliverable: | The timely allocation and expenditure of funding provided to aged care providers delivering care under the Flexible Aged Care program. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department provided funding of more than $23 million to 29 services funded through the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care Program. This program provides flexible, culturally appropriate aged care services to older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, close to their homes and community. | |
| Qualitative Deliverable: | The timely implementation of the Peer and Professional Support program aimed at providing Indigenous aged care service providers with access to professional advice on care management, governance and financial management and support to aged care staff. |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |
| The department commenced implementation of the support program by running an open tender process to select a panel of suitably qualified organisations to provide professional support services. The panel of support organisations will be appointed in 2010-11 to enable aged care service providers in remote areas, and those providing care to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians to access advice on care management, governance and financial management, and locum support. | |
| Qualitative Deliverable: | The introduction of an independent quality framework which will set standards for the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care Program. |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |
| Through the Indigenous aged care plan, the department is developing an independent quality framework to set standards for the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flexible Aged Care Program. The framework will include standards for health and personal care, safety and physical environment, culturally appropriate lifestyle and effective management and governance. During 2009, community consultations took place enabling the communities to meet and share their views. Following these meetings, a Consultation Package outlining the draft Quality Framework was developed for further comment from the communities before commencing a pilot program. |
|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2009-10 Actual: | -1.8% |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| A minor underspend as projects were delayed due to bad weather and lack of access to tradespeople. | |||
| Culturally Appropriate Aged Care | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of nationally funded projects and services catering for many language groups. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | >70 | 2009-10 Actual: | 75 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| The department funded 75 projects nationally to provide culturally and linguistically diverse communities with increased access to aged care services and information. Examples of projects include the provision of language specific resources and acting as a conduit between service providers and the community. | |||
| Culturally Appropriate Aged Care Services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of flexible places available for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 700 | 2009-10 Actual: | 653 |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| In 2009-10, more than 650 flexible places for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were funded; 30 new places have been allocated, and are expected to be operational in late 2011-12. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of projects undertaken to provide culturally appropriate aged care services to older Indigenous Australians. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 10 | 2009-10 Actual: | 65 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| During 2009-10, the department provided funding for over 65 projects to support culturally appropriate aged care services to older Indigenous Australians. The initial target was based on a small number of larger grants being provided instead of a larger number of grants allocated for smaller projects. These projects resulted in a greater number of services receiving grants to improve the quality of aged care services in the form of essential equipment and minor building upgrades. | |||
| Culturally Appropriate Aged Care | |
|---|---|
| Qualitative Indicator: | People from culturally and linguistically diverse communities have increased access to aged care services and information through targeted projects. This will be measured against the nature and extent of information currently available. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The number and nature of funded projects is dependent on the number and quality of applications received by the department. As a result of a competitive funding round held in 2009, the department funded 75 projects in 2009-10, compared to 77 in 2008-09. In 2009-10, 30 language groups were represented, compared to 27 in 2008-09. The overall result was increased access to aged care services and information for the community. | |
| Culturally Appropriate Aged Care | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Indicator: | Proportion of aged care recipients from culturally and linguistically diverse communities accessing culturally appropriate residential care and community based care. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≥95% | 2009-10 Actual: | N/A |
| Result: Cannot be reported. | |||
| Data for this performance indicator is currently not available. Although the department collects information about clients from culturally and linguistically diverse communities, no appropriate measure or proxy measure was able to be identified for this indicator. The department will continue to develop such a measure in 2010-11. | |||
6 Access Economics (August 2009), Keeping Dementia Front of Mind: Incidence and Prevalence 2009-2050, Access Economics, Canberra, p13.
7 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2007) Dementia in Australia: National Data Analysis and Development, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.
8 Telephone 1800 100 500.
9 Number of calls received for six months were extrapolated for the 2009-10 period. It is expected that the target of 28,000 will be exceeded by 6,584 calls with a total of 34,584 calls for the year.
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Regular stakeholder participation in program development, through avenues such as surveys, conferences, meetings, and submissions on departmental discussion papers. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| In 2009-10, the department was represented at the quarterly meetings of the Dementia Collaborative Research Centres Coordinating Committee, meetings of its Advisory Committee and each centre’s Steering Committee meetings. The department also attended the annual National Dementia Research Forum. Through these processes, the department contributed to setting the centres’ research priorities and work plans, assessed and commented on their research proposals, and commented on the centres’ draft reports, journal articles, conference presentations, publications, guidelines, tools and other project outcomes. The department also worked closely with the National Health and Medical Research Council to implement and manage the Dementia Research Grants program. This involved ongoing monitoring of the eight grant projects which commenced in 2007 and the 17 grant projects which commenced in 2009. |
|
| University Studies and Dementia Training | |
|---|---|
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Access to training and career pathways for health professionals and aged care workers. Measured by information received in progress reports required as funding agreement deliverables. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| Dementia Training Study Centres continue to provide education and training opportunities to dementia care providers including allied, medical, and nursing practitioners through the provision of scholarships, work based placements, guest lectures, professional development and curriculum development activities. Major difficulties for this project include: implementing dementia specific content into tertiary curricula, meeting the needs of the diverse and varied dementia care sector – from undergraduate students to specialist medical practitioners; and meeting the needs of stakeholders in regional, rural and remote areas. To mitigate these risks, the department is developing a proposal for a national coordination model and focusing on activities that will strengthen the uptake of these programs into clinical practice. |
|
| Dementia Behaviour Management Support | |
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Access to clinical advice for aged and community care workers, and carers of people with dementia, where the behaviour of the person with dementia is impacting on their care. Measured by information received in progress reports required as funding agreement deliverables. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| In 2009-10, the department worked closely with all eight Dementia Behaviour Management Advisory Service providers to ensure timely delivery of biannual progress reports and funding agreement deliverables. Target groups accessing the program increased, with the 24 hour a day telephone support service receiving a total of 15,007 calls from 1 April 2008 until 30 June 2010. Most of the reports were received on time. The current providers now have well established infrastructure, staffing and processes in place to meet the requirements of the program. The direct engagement of current providers until 2013 will ensure continuity and stability in the program and reduce potential disruption of services to clients. As part of negotiations with these organisations, the department will review the models of service delivery, data collection and the operation of the program in each jurisdiction to ensure local needs are effectively addressed. |
|
| Dementia Education and Information | |
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Access to information, counselling and support for people with dementia, their carers and families. Measured by information received in progress reports required as funding agreement deliverables. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department funds 36 of the 54 Commonwealth Respite and Carelink Centres to provide 40 education and training programs to carers of people living with dementia. Carers of people living with dementia are provided with, or linked to, a wide range of skill enhancement activities to assist them to care for the person with dementia. In addition, Alzheimer’s Australia is funded to provide information, counselling and support for people with dementia, their carers and families. Organisations are required to provide regular progress reports on activities. Alzheimer’s Australia provides statistical data in biannual reports on its information, counselling and support services. | |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2009-10 Actual: | -6.8% |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| Delays in finalising the national evaluation of the Dementia Initiative led to delays in implementing changes to the education and training program. There was also an underspend in the Dementia Behaviour Management Advisory Service. | |||
| Dementia Research | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of research projects undertaken. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 85 | 2009-10 Actual: | 128 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| Dementia Collaborative Research Centres had 115 projects underway at the end of 2009-10, of which 104 were research oriented. In addition, the National Health and Medical Research Council managed 25 research projects through the Dementia Research Grants Program. The program is focused on the practical application of evidence-based research in the areas of early intervention, risk reduction, assessment and treatment, care and service, and epidemiology and population health. |
|||
| Dementia Training | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of training places available to aged care workers. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 4,800 | 2009-10 Actual: | 5,425 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2009-10, the department entered into arrangements with registered training organisations to provide accredited dementia training to 4,800 residential and community aged care workers, however training was able to be delivered to 5,425 workers. | |||
| Dementia Behaviour Management Support | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of Behaviour Management Advisory Services funded. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 8 | 2009-10 Actual: | 8 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| Under existing arrangements, the department funded eight organisations, established in each state and territory, with the following models: Model A: Non-Government Auspice – Central Service: this model was implemented in the Australian Capital Territory, Western Australia, South Australia and Queensland. In each jurisdiction the relevant agency is Alzheimer’s Australia with the services being delivered from the capital city of each jurisdiction. Model B: Non-Government Auspice – Central service with Out-Posted Staff: this model was implemented in the Northern Territory where the auspice is Frontier Services and in Victoria where the auspice is St Vincent’s Hospital. Model C: Government Auspice – Central Service with Out-Posted Staff: This model was implemented in New South Wales and Tasmania. The auspice in each jurisdiction was the state health department and the Dementia Behaviour Management Advisory Services have been located within the Older Persons Mental Health Units. Both models have staff located within these units in regional areas. |
|||
| Qualitative Indicator: | An independent evaluation of the Dementia Initiative is due to report by 30 June 2009 and includes an evaluation of dementia projects both individually and as a whole. It also provides ongoing evaluation advice to organisations funded to undertake the individual projects. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The department received the final report of the independent evaluation of the Dementia Initiative in November 2009. The report identified that the Dementia Initiative has made a substantial contribution to support people living with dementia and their carers and that the early successes of the initiative could be built on and consolidated through lessons learning in the initiative. In 2009-10, the National Evaluation of the Dementia Initiative was completed. In line with the report findings, the department extended the scope of the Dementia Care Essentials training program to include training for both dementia specific units under the Certificate III and Certificate IV in Aged Care. |
|
| Dementia Research | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Indicator: | Percentage of research projects undertaken collaboratively. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 90% | 2009-10 Actual: | 100% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| All Dementia Collaborative Research Centres and Dementia Research Grant projects involve collaboration between researchers and with external entities such as service providers, academic institutions, consumers, government agencies and non-government organisations. In 2009-10, existing collaborations with Australian and overseas researchers in the dementia field were strengthened and opportunities for new collaborations were explored. | |||
| Dementia Training | |||
| Quantitative Indicator: | Improving the skills of aged care workers – measured by the percentage of training places taken up. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 100% | 2009-10 Actual: | 100% plus additional places offered |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| In 2009-10, participation in the program was higher than anticipated due to a larger number of aged care workers requesting training than originally planned. As a result, 625 additional training places were offered in addition to the 4,800 places planned for 2009-10. | |||
| Dementia Education and Information | |||
| Quantitative Indicator: | Number of calls to the National Dementia Helpline. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 28,000 | 2009-10 Actual: | 34,584 (estimated) |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| Data has not been received for the full period. This is expected by 30 September 2010. However the department, through the National Dementia Helpline, addressed a total of 17,292 calls for the period 1 July 2009 to 31 December 2009. This is 24 per cent above the target of 14,000 for the same period. The growth in demand for calls to the National Dementia Helpline will continue and represents a significant challenge in terms of ongoing capacity. Additional funding was provided in 2009-10 to assist in meeting growth in demand. |
|||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Regular stakeholder participation in program development through formal and informal mechanisms, which include cross-Government and other committees, evaluations and reviews, working groups, consumer research, census processes and trials. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| In 2009-10, the department consulted broadly across the health and ageing sectors on the Dementia Initiative, including the evaluation of the Dementia Initiative. The department has regular meetings with stakeholders, including the Minister’s Dementia Advisory Group, annual workshops with providers under the specific elements of the initiative, and ongoing dialogue with the state and territory governments to inform progress in relation to the National Framework for Action on Dementia. | |
| Flexible Care to Meet the Needs and Preferences of Older People | |
|---|---|
| Qualitative Deliverable: | The department reviews Flexible Aged Care Program initiatives to improve their quality and determine their effectiveness in meeting the needs of older people experiencing symptoms of dementia, and its results will be available in the 2009-10 financial year. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department received the final report of the independent evaluation of the Dementia Initiative in November 2009. The report identified that the Dementia Initiative has made a substantial contribution to support people living with dementia and their carers and that the early successes of the initiative could be built on and consolidated through lessons learned in the initiative. | |
| Community Care Packages for People with Complex Needs | |
| Qualitative Deliverable: | An independent evaluation of the Dementia Initiative is due to report by 30 June 2009 and includes an evaluation of all dementia projects both individually and as a whole, and also provides ongoing evaluation advice to organisations funded to undertake the individual projects. This evaluation includes the Extended Aged Care at Home Dementia program. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department received the final report of the independent evaluation of the Dementia Initiative in November 2009. The report identified that the Dementia Initiative has made a substantial contribution to support people living with dementia and their carers and that the early successes of the initiative could be built on and consolidated through lessons learned in the initiative. | |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2009-10 Actual: | 0.6% |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| A payment for July 2010 was processed in June 2010 and has subsequently resulted in an increase for the 2009-10 financial year. | |||
| Flexible Care to Meet the Needs and Preferences of Older Australians | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of operational flexible aged care places in Multipurpose Services. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 2,817 | 2009-10 Actual: | 3,120 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2009-10, the Multipurpose Service Program increased the availability of aged care in rural and remote communities. The department allocated 14 Multipurpose Service places which were made operational by the state and territory governments. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Allocation of additional transition care places. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 470 | 2009-10 Actual: | 470 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2009-10, the department worked with state and territory health departments to make the 470 new transition care places operational. This brought the total number of operational transition care places nationally to 2,698 (2,000 existing and 698 additional transition care places). | |||
| Community Care Packages for People with Complex Needs | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Estimated numbers of Extended Aged Care at Home places. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 5,117 | 2009-10 Actual: | 5,584 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| More Extended Aged Care at Home places were allocated in the 2008-09 Aged Care Approvals Round than originally planned. These packages will help support older Australians to remain at home by providing practical and clinical care in the community. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Estimated numbers of Extended Aged Care at Home Dementia places. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 2,438 | 2009-10 Actual: | 2,583 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| More Extended Aged Care at Home Dementia places were allocated in the 2008-09 Aged Care Approvals Round than originally planned. These packages will help support older Australians to remain at home by providing practical and clinical care in the community. | |||
| Flexible Care to Meet the Needs and Preferences of Older Australians | |
|---|---|
| Qualitative Indicator: | The target percentage of people whose functional capacity improves during a transition care episode is 60 per cent. This will be measured by Transition Care service providers who will assess clients using the Modified Barthel Index at the start and finish of the Transition Care episode. The variance between the start and finish scores is the measurement of functional improvement. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| In 2009-10, 60 per cent of people who received transition care gained functional improvement, as assessed using the Modified Barthel Index, which includes assessment of activities of daily living such as personal hygiene, feeding and independent movement, on discharge from the Transition Care Program, compared with their functional capacity score on entry to the Transition Care Program. | |
| Qualitative Indicator: | The target percentage of people who return home after their transition care episode with or without community care support is 45 per cent. This will be measured by Transition Care service providers who complete a Medicare Australia claim form citing the client’s ‘discharge destination’. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| In 2009-10, 50 per cent of people who received transition care returned home either with or without community care support, rather than needing residential aged care services. Community care support includes Home and Community Care services, Community Aged Care Packages, Extended Aged Care at Home or Extended Aged Care at Home Dementia packages. | |
| Flexible Care to Meet the Needs and Preferences of Older Australians | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Indicator: | More clients accessing increasing numbers of operational transition care places. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≤2,698 | 2009-10 Actual: | 2,698 |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| An additional 470 transition care places were made operational in 2009-10, bringing the total number of operational places to 2,698. | |||
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Regular stakeholder participation in program development, through avenues such as surveys, conferences, meetings, and submissions on departmental discussion papers. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| In 2009-10, there were two meetings of the Ageing Consultative Committee and two meetings of the Aged Care Funding Instrument Industry Reference Group. | |
| Aged Care for Older Indigenous Australians | |
|---|---|
| Qualitative Deliverable: | The timely allocation and expenditure of capital funding provided to eligible aged care providers delivering care to older Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| In 2009-10, the department supported aged care providers to provide Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities with culturally appropriate aged care through the provision of support for building infrastructure and capital works. The department progressed staff accommodation to assist in engaging and retaining staff in three flexible aged care services in the Northern Territory, South Australia and Queensland, together with two other services in Victoria and Western Australia and two in Queensland. Capital maintenance and upgrade work was also initiated in all 11 Flexible Aged Care Services in the Northern Territory. | |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2009-10 Actual: | 2.2% |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| The actual average cost per operational aged care place was higher than originally estimated. The department aimed for broad sector coverage and a high volume of reviews to support the sector’s understanding of the new funding instrument. |
|||
| Equitable Access | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of residential aged care places made available in the annual Aged Care Approvals Round. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 9,182 | 2009-10 Actual: | 8,140 |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| The places made available in the 2009-10 Aged Care Approvals Round will ensure that the overall target ratio of 113 aged care places per 1,000 people aged 70 or over will be achieved in 2011, and that the balance of 48 high care and 65 low care is also achieved in 2011. This will be done through allowing greater flexibility in the balance between community and residential places. For the 2009-10 Aged Care Approvals Round, the target level for the provision of high level community care provision increased from four to five places, with the target level for high level residential care in 2011 to be 43 (rather than 44) places per 1,000. |
|||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Total value of zero real interest loans provided to aged care providers to build in locations where they may not have previously been prepared to invest (funding ends in 2009-10). | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | $150m | 2009-10 Actual: | Aged Care Approvals Round ongoing at 30 June 2010 |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| The second round of the Zero Real Interest Loans program was advertised as part of the 2009-10 Aged Care Approvals Round. Aged care providers were able to apply for a minimum of $150 million in loans to build or expand residential aged care services in areas of high need. As at 30 June 2010, the round was still being assessed. | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of residential aged care places offered with zero real interest loans (funding ends in 2009-10). | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 1,250 | 2009-10 Actual: | Aged Care Approvals Round ongoing at 30 June 2010 |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| The second round of the Zero Real Interest Loans program was advertised as part of the 2009-10 Aged Care Approvals Round. Aged care providers were able to apply for a minimum of 1,250 places to build or expand residential aged care services in areas of high need. As at 30 June 2010, the round was still being assessed. | |||
| Aged Care for Older Indigenous Australians | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of projects undertaken to provide culturally appropriate aged care services to older Indigenous Australians. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 5 | 2009-10 Actual: | 13 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2009-10, the department undertook 13 projects to help deliver culturally appropriate aged care services to older Indigenous Australians. Activities supported under the Remote and Indigenous Service Support Program included assistance for aged care providers to access professional services, including: registered nurses; implementation of care assessment tools; the development of an Indigenous Aged Care Design Guide; and projects to facilitate recruitment and retention in remote areas through improvements to staff accommodation. | |||
| Residential Support and Accreditation | |||
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of unannounced visits per aged care home per year conducted by the Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≥1 | 2009-10 Actual: | 1.29 |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2009-10, the Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency conducted 3,570 unannounced site visits to homes which equates to 1.29 visits per home. The agency conducts unannounced visits to homes to ensure homes are meeting the Accreditation Standards at all times. | |||
| Aged Care for Older Indigenous Australians | |
|---|---|
| Qualitative Indicator: | The timely allocation of funds to support eligible services to undertake essential capital works to upgrade or expand. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| In 2009-10, the department facilitated the timely allocation of funds to support eligible services to undertake essential capital works to upgrade or expand. The department progressed essential capital works maintenance and priority upgrades in 11 Flexible Aged Care Services in the Northern Territory. A range of projects were also progressed in eligible services throughout Australia, including upgrades and rebuilds to kitchens and improved provisions for fire safety and occupational health and safety. | |
| Residential Support and Accreditation | |
| Qualitative Indicator: | Enhancements to the accreditation process are developed in consultation with key stakeholders, including consumers of residential aged care services and the aged care industry. This will be measured by reporting on the consultation process undertaken by the department in reviewing the accreditation process. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The department published a discussion paper on the review of the accreditation process on its website in May 2009 and advertised a call for submissions in the national media. A total of 147 submissions were received from a range of stakeholders, including the aged care industry, consumers and health professionals. Following the analysis of these submissions, the department consulted with members of the Ageing Consultative Committee and held a teleconference with peak consumer groups. Further consultations will occur during 2010-11 and these consultations will inform the implementation of enhancements to the accreditation process arising from the review. | |
| Equitable Access | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Indicator: | Provision of operational residential aged care places. Measured by the number of residential aged care places per 1,000 people aged 70 years or over. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≤88 | 2009-10 Actual: | 86.8 |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |||
| As at 30 June 2010, there were 86.8 operational aged care places per 1,000 persons aged 70 and over. That is 98.6 per cent of the target. The operational ratio is subject to a range of influences, including changes in population, the level of uptake of places and the time that it takes to bring new places on line. While the release of places takes these factors into consideration, in any given year, the result can vary from the target. Over each of the last four years, the target operational ratio for residential places has been substantially met, with only slight variation:
|
|||
| Quantitative Indicator: | Increase in the proportion of residential aged care places that become operational within two years of being allocated. Measured by the percentage of places allocated in the Aged Care Approvals Round. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | > 21% | 2009-10 Actual: | 24% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| Twenty four per cent of residential aged care places allocated in the 2007 Aged Care Approvals Round became operational within two years of allocation. | |||
| Aged Care for Older Indigenous Australians | |||
| Quantitative Indicator: | Improved capacity, buildings and equipment in remote Indigenous aged care services. Measured by the amount of grants allocated to eligible aged care services. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | $2.7 million | 2009-10 Actual: | $2.7 million |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| In 2009-10, the department worked to improve the capacity, buildings and equipment in remote Indigenous aged care services. The department provided 24 grants in remote and Indigenous aged care services across Australia. The funded projects included essential capital works maintenance and priority upgrades in the 11 Flexible Aged Care Services in the Northern Territory. A range of other projects were also progressed in eligible services throughout Australia, including upgrades and rebuilds to kitchens, improved provisions for fire safety and occupational health and safety, the provision of replacement equipment and installation of fire protection devices to increase the safety of traditional open fire usage. | |||
| (A) Budget Estimate 2009-10 $’000 |
(B) Actual 2009-10 $’000 |
Variation (Column B minus Column A) $’000 |
Budget Estimate 2010-11 $’000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program 4.1: Aged Care Assessment | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 1,143 | 877 | ( 266) | 1,161 |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 5,077 | 5,236 | 159 | 5,596 |
| Revenues from other sources | 76 | 93 | 17 | 80 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense1 | - | - | - | 168 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 2 | 2 | - |
| Total for Program 4.1 | 6,296 | 6,208 | ( 88) | 7,005 |
| Program 4.2: Aged Care Workforce | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 55,940 | 53,204 | ( 2,736) | 67,686 |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 6,548 | 7,264 | 716 | 7,218 |
| Revenues from other sources | 99 | 129 | 30 | 103 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense1 | - | - | - | 217 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 3 | 3 | - |
| Total for Program 4.2 | 62,587 | 60,600 | ( 1,987) | 75,224 |
| Program 4.3: Ageing Information and Support | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 38,457 | 38,210 | ( 247) | 43,329 |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 56,162 | 60,581 | 4,419 | 61,906 |
| Revenues from other sources | 846 | 1,077 | 231 | 885 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense1 | - | - | - | 1,858 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 27 | 27 | - |
| Total for Program 4.3 | 95,465 | 99,895 | 4,430 | 107,978 |
| Program 4.4: Community Care | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 324,682 | 317,191 | ( 7,491) | 293,538 |
| Special appropriations |
|
|
|
|
| Aged Care Act 1997 – Community Care Subsidies | 508,191 | 508,733 | 542 | 583,973 |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 36,066 | 37,748 | 1,682 | 39,754 |
| Revenues from other sources | 543 | 671 | 128 | 568 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense1 | - | - | - | 1,193 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 17 | 17 | - |
| Total for Program 4.4 | 869,482 | 864,360 | ( 5,122) | 919,026 |
| Program 4.5: Culturally Appropriate Aged Care | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 30,173 | 29,638 | ( 535) | 31,842 |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 7,688 | 3,950 | ( 3,738) | 8,474 |
| Revenues from other sources | 116 | 70 | ( 46) | 121 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense1 | - | - | - | 254 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 2 | 2 | - |
| Total for Program 4.5 | 37,977 | 33,660 | ( 4,317) | 40,691 |
| Program 4.6: Dementia | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 30,784 | 28,706 | ( 2,078) | 31,278 |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 4,078 | 4,035 | ( 43) | 4,495 |
| Revenues from other sources | 61 | 72 | 11 | 64 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense1 | - | - | - | 135 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 2 | 2 | - |
| Total for Program 4.6 | 34,923 | 32,815 | ( 2,108) | 35,972 |
| Program 4.7: Flexible Aged Care | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Special appropriations |
|
|
|
|
| Aged Care Act 1997 - Flexible Care Subsidies | 517,842 | 520,753 | 2,911 | 724,513 |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 6,366 | 6,540 | 174 | 7,017 |
| Revenues from other sources | 96 | 116 | 20 | 100 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense1 | - | - | - | 211 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 3 | 3 | - |
| Total for Program 4.7 | 524,304 | 527,412 | 3,108 | 731,841 |
| Program 4.8: Residential Care | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 65,610 | 73,884 | 8,274 | 89,449 |
| Special appropriations |
|
|
|
|
| Aged Care Act 1997 – Residential Care Subsidies | 5,896,807 | 6,027,657 | 130,850 | 6,239,441 |
| Aged Care (Bond Security) Act 2006 | 15,900 | 25,149 | 9,249 | - |
| Unfunded Expenses – zero interest loans concessional loan discount | 16,329 | - | ( 16,329) | 128,408 |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 50,556 | 47,854 | ( 2,702) | 55,725 |
| Revenues from other sources | 761 | 851 | 90 | 797 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense1 | - | - | - | 1,672 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 21 | 21 | - |
| Total for Program 4.8 | 6,045,963 | 6,175,416 | 129,453 | 6,515,492 |
| Outcome 4 Totals by appropriation type | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 546,789 | 541,710 | ( 5,079) | 558,283 |
| Special appropriations | 6,938,740 | 7,082,292 | 143,552 | 7,547,927 |
| Unfunded expenses | 16,329 | - | ( 16,329) | 128,408 |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 172,541 | 173,208 | 667 | 190,185 |
| Revenues from other sources | 2,598 | 3,079 | 481 | 2,718 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense1 | - | - | - | 5,708 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 77 | 77 | - |
| Total expenses for Outcome 4 | 7,676,997 | 7,800,366 | 123,369 | 8,433,229 |
| Average Staffing Level (Number) | 1,149 | 1,142 | ( 7) | 1,273 |
1 Reflects the change to net cash appropriation framework implemented from 2010-11.
Produced by the Portfolio Strategies Division, Australian
Government Department of Health and Ageing.
URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/annrpt/publishing.nsf/Content/annual-report-0910-toc~0910-2~0910-2-3~0910-2-3-4
If you would like to know more or give us your comments contact: annrep@health.gov.au