You are in:
Improved access to public hospitals, acute care services and public dental services, including through targeted strategies, and payments to State and Territory Governments.
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Regular stakeholder participation in program development: Working collaboratively with the authority, state and territory governments, and sector representatives including non-government and clinical organisations, in relation to organ and tissue donation policy and activities. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department provided advice and support to the Australian Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Authority on issues associated with the implementation of the national reform package. The department worked collaboratively with state and territory governments and sector representatives to agree a new four-year funding and performance framework, to be implemented from 2010-11, to support the National Cord Blood Collection Network. The new arrangements are intended to strengthen reporting of transplant outcomes and implementation of government policy on cord blood collection strategies and targets. |
|
| Improving Australians’ Access to Organ and Tissue Transplants | |
|---|---|
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Provision of strategic and practical policy advice based on analysis and research of national and international best practice organ and tissue donation experiences. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| In 2009-10, the department continued to provide high quality, relevant and timely advice to ministers on organ and tissue donation policy issues. The department also provided support, strategic direction and advice on policy issues to the Australian Organ and Tissue and Transplantation Authority to assist it in implementing the national reform package. | |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2009-10 Actual: | -0.1% |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| In 2009-10, the department’s administered expenses for Blood and Organ Services were 0.1 per cent less than the revised budget, which is within the set target range. Variations in estimates are largely due to the use of some blood products being less than projected by states and territories in early 2009. During 2010-11 the department will work with states and territories and the National Blood Authority to improve mechanisms for estimating blood and blood products for future demand. |
|||
| Improving Australians’ Access to Organ and Tissue Transplants | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Number of banked cord blood units (funding ceases 30 June 2010). | ||
2009-10 Target:
|
2,379 129 |
2009-10 Actual:
|
2,225 62 |
| Result: Deliverable substantially met. | |||
| In 2009-10, the National Cord Blood Collection Network collected, processed, banked and released high quality stem cell units derived from umbilical cord blood for transplant into patients with blood related malignant and immune disorders. The network released 34 cord blood units for transplantation in Australian patients and 83 units for international patients. Total cord blood units banked were close to target despite collection staff shortages at one cord blood bank. Collections from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were below target. A review of the collection strategies for this and minority ethnic groups is planned for 2010-11. In April 2010, Health Ministers agreed to continue funding the National Cord Blood Collection Network until 2013-14. |
|||
| Improving Australians’ Access to Organ and Tissue Transplants | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Indicator: | Percentage of eligible Australians in need of a bone marrow, cord blood or peripheral stem cell transplant who are able to access appropriate treatment. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 100% | 2009-10 Actual: | 100% |
| Result: Indicator met. | |||
| All eligible Australians in need of a transplant have been able to access suitably matched bone marrow, cord blood or peripheral blood stem cells for transplantation. The department has historically met this indicator. |
|||
1 This measure was announced in the Budget in May 2009, as part of a package on maternity services reforms (see Outcome 5.3). Funding for this measure is included in Outcome 13.2.
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Timely production of evidence-based policy research through: Analysis of data provided through the Medical Indemnity National Collection and published in reports by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. This data, along with the Australian Government Actuary’s annual report on the cost of the Australian Government’s Run-off Cover Scheme for medical indemnity insurers and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission’s medical indemnity monitoring report, will be used by the department to analyse the effectiveness of the arrangements and as a base for further policy development. This indicator will be measured by timely provision of policy advice in response to emerging trends. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| Policy advice on emerging trends in the medical indemnity industry was provided to the government in a timely manner based on analysis and monitoring of qualitative data on medical indemnity trends and issues. | |
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Regular stakeholder participation in program development, through avenues such as conferences and regular meetings. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department worked closely with Medicare Australia, the Australian Government Actuary and medical indemnity insurers to ensure that the medical indemnity program continued to meet its policy objectives. | |
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2009-10 Actual: | -74.4% |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| While the deliverable was not met, the program objectives were substantially met. Medical Indemnity programs only respond to finalised claims when they are lodged by Medical Indemnity insurers. Total claims have been less than estimated by the Australian Government Actuary. Any remaining actuarially estimated liabilities are carried forward. | |||
| Keeping Premiums Affordable | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of eligible applicants receiving a premium subsidy. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 100% | 2009-10 Actual: | 100% |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |||
| All eligible doctors who applied for a premium subsidy received it. | |||
| Keeping Premiums Affordable | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Indicator: | Number of doctors that receive a premium subsidy support under the Premium Support Scheme. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 3,468 | 2009-10 Actual: | 2,443 |
| Result: Indicator not met. | |||
| This is a reduction from the 2,556 doctors who received a premium subsidy in 2008-09. A reduction in the number of doctors receiving a premium subsidy under the Premium Support Scheme generally indicates that medical indemnity premiums are more affordable. | |||
2 Available at www.myhospitals.gov.au.
3 The National Health and Hospital Reform Commission’s final report A Healthier Future for all Australians was part of the major health reform undertaken in 2009-10. For further information on health reform, please refer to the Secretary’s Review.
4 International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification, Seventh Edition.
5 Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Group (AR-DRG), available at: www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/Casemix-1.
6 Available at www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/sooph10.
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Timely production of evidence-based policy research: Data provided through the Public Hospitals and Information Program will be analysed and published in reports by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, the COAG Reform Council, the Report on Government Services, and the State of Our Public Hospitals report. The states and territories will be able to use this information to improve health service delivery. The data will also inform the Australian Government about where resources are most effectively targeted. Analysis by the department of data provided as part of The Heads of Agreement for the management, operation and funding of the Mersey Community Hospital with the Tasmanian Government will seek to improve health services in the north-west region of Tasmania. The data will also inform the Australian Government as to whether Tasmania is meeting its obligations to continue to provide the agreed core clinical activities at the hospital. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| On 30 June 2010, the department published the seventh State of Our Public Hospitals June 2010.7 The 2010 report, presented public hospital performance in 2008-09 with comparisons of private hospitals and chapters on hospital use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and on hospital maternity services. Regular data has been provided by the Tasmanian Government on the operation of the Mersey Community Hospital and the services provided. The hospital continues to provide all of the core services that are outlined in the agreement. The agreement also provides for the expansion of services provided at the hospital. Services have been expanded in the areas of endoscopy, elective cataract surgery and urology. |
|
| Qualitative Deliverable: | Regular stakeholder participation in program development, through such avenues as regular meetings and conferences. In addition: the department will consult with the states and territories and private sector, which are key stakeholders in program development and data production, seeking collaboration across all levels of government and with input from appropriate health care experts. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| The department worked with consumers, industry and all state and territory governments towards improving the provision of acute care hospital services and dental services by ensuring that policy directions reflect, where appropriate, the broader concerns of the health sector. Consultation was achieved through the annual Australian Health Care Agreement Data Meeting; regular National Partnership Agreement Implementation Steering Committee and its working groups; the Emergency Department/Activity Based Funding and Subacute Care Measurement Working Group; and monthly Elective Surgery Waiting List Reduction Plan Working Group. Quarterly working groups conducted through the Private Hospital Working Group and the Hospital Casemix Protocols, represented by states and territories and key stakeholders from the private sector, to negotiate private hospital data changes, change management rules and streamline operational activities. |
|
| Improving Health Care Services in North-West Tasmania | |
|---|---|
| Qualitative Deliverable: | A North West Health Services Network Advisory Group has been established by the Tasmanian Government to meet the obligation in the Mersey Community Hospital Agreement to enable consumers and other stakeholders to provide input into the direction and development of health services for the Mersey Community Hospital and the north-west region of Tasmania. |
| Result: Deliverable met. | |
| In 2009-10, the department participated in quarterly meetings of the North West Health Services Network Advisory Group. | |
7 Available at www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/sooph10.
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage of variance between actual and budgeted expenses. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | ≤0.5% | 2009-10 Actual: | -4.1% |
| Result: Deliverable not met. | |||
| All program deliverables were substantially met in 2009-10, although some delays in implementation occurred due to the expansion of health reform strategies under the National Health and Hospitals Network Agreement. The Hospital Accountability and Performance Program and some aspects of activity-based funding were affected. However, overall agreed timeframes are still expected to be met. | |||
| Reform of and Access to Public Hospital Services | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Deliverable: | Percentage expansion of state and territory subacute service provision. | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 5% | 2009-10 Actual: | Data will be available by December 2010 |
| Result: Deliverable cannot be reported. | |||
| Data to determine whether this deliverable was met or not met will not be available until December 2010. In their published progress reports covering the first six months of the National Partnership Agreement on Health and Hospital Workforce Reform, all states and territories reported that overall, implementation is on track against their plans and against the agreed annual service growth targets. | |||
| Improving Health Care Services in North-West Tasmania | |
|---|---|
| Qualitative Indicator: | The provision of safe and sustainable hospital services for the people in the north-west region of Tasmania can be measured by the ongoing effective management and operation of the Mersey Community Hospital. Under the agreement between the Australian Government and the Tasmanian Government, Tasmania is funded to manage and operate the Mersey Community Hospital. The effectiveness of this agreement will be measured by the ongoing provision of the services specified in the agreement. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The Mersey Community Hospital continues to operate in accordance with the agreement between the Australian Government and the Tasmanian Government to ensure that people in the north-west region of Tasmania have access to safe, appropriate and sustainable health care services. The hospital continues to provide all of the core services that are outlined in the agreement and the agreement also provides for expansion of the range of services provided at the hospital. Services have been expanded in the areas of endoscopy, elective cataract surgery and urology. | |
| Improving Access to Public Dental Services | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantitative Indicator: | Number of additional public dental visits delivered by the states and territories above agreed baseline. Measured by a reduction in state and territory public dental waiting list for priority groups assisted (Commencement date subject to Senate decision). | ||
| 2009-10 Target: | 166,5008 | 2009-10 Actual: | Nil |
| Result: Indicator not met. | |||
| The planned closure of the Medicare Chronic Disease Dental Scheme did not proceed in 2009-10. The Senate did not support the closure and the government was unable to put in place the necessary subordinate legislation to close the scheme, with the consequence that funding for the Commonwealth Dental Health Program is not presently available. | |||
8 Data caveat: A target of 1 million additional visits has been set over 36 months, but year-by-year breakdowns are subject to negotiations with individual jurisdictions.
| (A) Budget Estimate 2009-10 $’000 | (B) Actual 2009-10 $’000 |
Variation (Column B minus Column A) $’000 |
Budget Estimate 2010-11 $’000 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program 13.1: Blood and Organ Donation Services | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 9,784 | 9,370 | ( 414) | 13,554 |
| Special appropriations |
|
|
|
|
| National Health Act 1953 – Blood Fractionation, Products and Blood Related Products – to National Blood Authority | 548,056 | 548,056 | - | 613,409 |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 5,926 | 6,093 | 167 | 8,729 |
| Revenues from other sources | 315 | 245 | ( 70) | 320 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense1 | - | - | - | 129 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 3 | 3 | - |
| Total for Program 13.1 | 564,081 | 563,767 | ( 314) | 636,141 |
| Program 13.2: Medical Indemnity | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 250 | 247 | ( 3) | 157 |
| Special appropriations |
|
|
|
|
| Medical Indemnity Act 2002 | 100,900 | 26,215 | ( 74,685) | 115,409 |
| Unfunded Expenses2 | 2,200 | - | ( 2,200) | - |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 2,959 | 3,269 | 310 | 4,358 |
| Revenues from other sources | 157 | 132 | ( 25) | 160 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense1 | - | - | - | 65 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 2 | 2 | - |
| Total for Program 13.2 | 106,466 | 29,865 | ( 76,601) | 120,149 |
| Program 13.3: Public Hospitals and Information | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 82,027 | 78,643 | ( 3,384) | 121,779 |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 17,018 | 17,553 | 535 | 25,732 |
| Revenues from other sources | 919 | 706 | ( 213) | 932 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense | - | - | - | 377 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 8 | 8 | - |
| Total for Program 13.3 | 99,964 | 96,910 | ( 3,054) | 148,820 |
| Outcome 13 Totals by appropriation type | ||||
| Administered Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 92,061 | 88,260 | ( 3,801) | 135,490 |
| Special appropriations | 648,956 | 574,271 | ( 74,685) | 728,818 |
| Unfunded Expenses | 2,200 | - | ( 2,200) | - |
| Departmental Expenses | ||||
| Ordinary Annual Services (Annual Appropriation Bill 1) | 25,903 | 26,915 | 1,012 | 38,819 |
| Revenues from other sources | 1,391 | 1,083 | ( 308) | 1,412 |
| Unfunded depreciation expense1 | - | - | - | 571 |
| Operating loss / (surplus) | - | 13 | 13 | - |
| Total Expenses for Outcome 13 | 770,511 | 690,542 | ( 79,969) | 905,110 |
| Average Staffing Level (Number) | 172 | 172 | - | 221 |
1 Reflects the change to net cash appropriation framework implemented from 2010-11.
Produced by the Portfolio Strategies Division, Australian
Government Department of Health and Ageing.
URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/annrpt/publishing.nsf/Content/annual-report-0910-toc~0910-2~0910-2-3~0910-2-3-13
If you would like to know more or give us your comments contact: annrep@health.gov.au