| Program 1.1 – Chronic Disease – Early Detection and Prevention | |
|---|---|
| Indicator: | Participation rates in breast cancer, bowel cancer, and cervical screening programs which have a sound evidence-base and are responsive to new and emerging trends. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Maintain participation in breast cancer, bowel cancer and cervical screening programs. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The latest data for the BreastScreen Australia program shows an increase in participation (including in regional and very remote areas) from 55.7% for 2003–04 to 56.9% in 2005–06 for the target group of women aged 50 to 69 years. Early analysis of available data for bowel screening indicates that the participation rate for 2008–09 remains at approximately 40%, consistent with the participation rate reported at June 2008. The suspension of the program for part of the year may influence the participation rate for 2008–09, and into the future. Final data will be available in late 2009. The latest available data for the National Cervical Screening Program shows an increase in the two-year participation rate from 60.6% in 2005 and 2006 to 61.5% in 2006 and 2007 for the target age group of women aged 20 to 69 years. The three-year and five-year participation rates to 2007 were 74.0% and 86.4% respectively. | |
| Indicator: | Establishment of a Preventative Health Care Taskforce and development of a National Preventative Health Care Strategy. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Preventative Health Care Taskforce established by June 2008. National Preventative Health Strategy submitted to Minister by June 2009. |
| Note: This performance indicator was amended in the 2008–09 Health and Ageing Portfolio Additional Estimates Statements, to reflect that the National Preventative Health Strategy would be ‘submitted’ to the Minister by June 2009, not ‘established’. | |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The Preventative Health Taskforce was established in April 2008 to provide the Government with advice on addressing chronic disease caused by obesity, tobacco and excessive alcohol consumption. The taskforce developed and submitted a National Preventative Health Strategy to the Minister for Health and Ageing for consideration within the stipulated timeframe. | |
| Indicator: | Implementation of initiatives targeting nutrition, physical activity, obesity, overweight and injury. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Initiatives implemented in accordance with respective dates and targets. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
The Department implemented a number of initiatives targeting nutrition, physical activity, obesity and overweight in accordance with their respective dates and targets. Examples include:
| |
| Program 1.2 – Communicable Disease Control | |
|---|---|
| Indicator: | Improved knowledge, attitude and behaviours in relation to communicable diseases and associated health risks through targeted health promotion and disease prevention campaigns, including social marketing. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Improvements in knowledge, attitudes and behaviours in relation to disease and health risks. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
The Department improved knowledge, attitudes and behaviours in relation to disease and health risks included by:
| |
| Indicator: | Effective communicable disease prevention and detection in accordance with a sound evidence-base and with responsiveness to new and emerging trends. Measured through notification rates for HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis C, and Sexually Transmissible Infections. |
| Reference Point/Target: | A positive impact on notification rates of HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis C and Sexually Transmissible Infections. |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |
| In 2008–09, the Department implemented national strategies to improve notification rates of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis C and sexually transmissible infections; and funded qualitative research into knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviours, which provides data for evidence-based approaches to education and prevention activities. Whilst notification rates for AIDS, hepatitis C and gonorrhoea have declined, notification rates for HIV and chlamydia have risen (refer to data in Key Facts for 2008–09: Sexually Transmissible Disease Rates Across the Years under Targeted Disease Prevention). | |
| Indicator: | A new national strategic approach that identifies priority actions to reduce the transmission of sexually transmissible and blood borne viral infections developed through an evaluation and review of existing strategies. The new strategy will be endorsed by the Australian Health Ministers’ Conference. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Evaluation and review of existing national strategies, development of a new strategy, and its endorsement by the Australian Health Minsters’ Conference completed by 30 June 2009. |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |
| A final report on the evaluation and review of the existing national strategic framework has been received from the consultant. Acceptance of the final report will complete Stage One of the review proccess. Stage Two of the review commenced in 2008–09, overlapping with Stage One. The requirements for Stage Two were discussed at the inaugural meeting of the Ministerial Advisory Committee on Blood Borne Viruses and Sexually Transmissible Infections, in March 2009. Writing groups for each strategy, consisting of stakeholders and subject matter experts have been formed and have held meetings to progress the writing task. Draft strategies will be presented to the Australian Health Ministers’ Conference in late 2009. | |
| Program 1.3 – Drug Strategy | |
|---|---|
| Indicator: | Reduced community harm caused by the misuse of licit drugs and the use of illicit drugs. Measured by monitoring the number of Australians using tobacco, consuming alcohol at harmful levels and using illicit drugs. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Continued reduction in the population using tobacco or illicit drugs, and/or consuming alcohol at harmful levels. |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |
| The number of Australians aged 14 years or older counted as daily smokers, declined from 3.3 million (21.8%) in 1998 to 2.9 million (16.6%) in 2007. Whilst the proportion of Australians aged 14 years and older regularly drinking at risky levels has remained relatively stable between 2004 and 2007, there has been a small increase. According to 2007 data, 8.6% drank at levels considered risky or high risk for both short-term and long-term harm, compared with 8.3% in 2004. A significant decrease in the regular use of illicit drugs has been observed, falling from 15.3% in 2004 to 13.4% in 2007. While cannabis remains the most commonly used illicit drug in Australia, recent use was seen to decline significantly from 11.3% in 2004 to 9.1% in 2007. The proportion of the population recently using methamphetamines also declined over the same period from 3.2% to 2.3%. These data are sourced from the 2004 and 2007 National Drug Strategy Household Surveys (available at www.aihw.gov.au). | |
| Program 1.4 – Food and Regulatory Policy | |
|---|---|
| Indicator: | Compensate licit importers of Kava affected by the June 2007 ban on Kava, with the intent to reduce community harm caused by misuse of Kava. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Comprehensive ‘buy back’ of Kava from permit holders who have paid for Kava or became bound to pay for Kava, on or before, 25 June 2007. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The kava ‘buy back’ scheme was fully implemented and completed by 13 June 2008. Of the eight kava detainments made by Australian Customs, six importers signed a deed of assignment and release to transfer ownership of the kava to the Commonwealth for destruction. The six importers were paid a total of $48,822.49 (GST inclusive), with the last payment made on the 9 April 2008. The remaining two importers re-exported the detained kava at their own expense. The total cost of the kava ‘buy back’ scheme was $161,565.89 which included a payment made on 13 June 2008 to Australian Customs for kava storage and destruction costs of $112,743.40. No further payments were made after 13 June 2008. | |
| Indicator: | Effective support provided to the Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council. |
| Reference Point/Target: | All meetings conducted. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The Department supported the Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council through the provision of secretariat services by conducting two scheduled meetings of the council and nine meetings of its subcommittees, and holding two national stakeholder communications forums. | |
| Indicator: | Effective input into food standards development. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Input provided into all standard notifications. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The Department provided input to all 29 standard notifications in 2008–09, within set timeframes. | |
| Program 1.5 – Immunisation | |
|---|---|
| Indicator: | The implementation of new immunisation registers and the linking of recently introduced vaccines to existing incentive schemes will continue to support and enhance high immunisation coverage rates across targeted cohorts. The effectiveness of immunisation programs will be evaluated by monitoring notification rates of vaccine preventable diseases. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Increase in immunisation from the previous year. A positive impact on notification rates of vaccine preventable diseases. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The Department introduced the National HPV Register in June 2008 which, as at 30 June 2009, had received 2.6 million notifications. This initiative has seen 84.8% (approximately 18,400) of invited general practitioners opting to record administered doses of Gardasil® on the register. Immunisation rates in 2008–09 continued to be high, with the national average rate of immunisation being almost 93% at two years of age (this compares with 92.8% in 2007–08). | |
| Program 1.6 – Public Health | |
|---|---|
| Indicator: | Skilled public health workforce is available to address critical threats of public health and safety. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Increased public health workforce capacity including the number of Indigenous Australian students and academics. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
The Department helped increase public health workforce capacity in Australia through initiatives such as:
| |
| Indicator: | Health economic evaluations of investments in disease prevention and health promotion undertaken. |
| Reference Point/Target: | All programs scheduled for evaluation are assessed. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| In 2008-09, the Department, as part of the evaluation of Breastscreen Australia, undertook an economic evaluation and modelling study. No other major programs funded under the National Public Health Program were due for evaluation in 2008-09. | |
| Output Group 1 – Policy Advice | |
|---|---|
| Indicator: | Quality, relevant and timely advice for Australian Government decision-making measured by ministerial satisfaction. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Ministerial satisfaction. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| Ministers were satisfied with the quality, relevance and timeliness of advice provided for Australian Government decision-making. | |
| Indicator: | Production of relevant and timely evidence-based policy research. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Relevant evidence-based policy research produced in a timely manner. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The Department provided high quality and timely evidence-based policy research to support the development of the new National Partnership Agreement on Preventive Health. The Department also investigated options for addressing overweight and obesity, smoking and excessive alcohol consumption (including binge drinking) in order to design the interventions funded through the National Partnership Agreement. | |
| Output Group 2 – Program Management | |
|---|---|
| Indicator: | Administered budget predictions are met and actual expenses vary less than 0.5% from budgeted expenses measured by comparison of actual expenses against budget. |
| Reference Point/Target: | 0.5% variance from budgeted expenses. |
| Result: Indicator not met. | |
| The actual Administered expenses for Outcome 1 were 1.6% below budgeted expenses. This was primarily due to delays in contracted program deliverables and longer than expected negotiations for a number of funding agreements. | |
| Indicator: | Stakeholders participate in program development through a range of avenues, such as surveys, conferences, meetings, and submissions on departmental discussion papers. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Stakeholders participate in program development. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
The Department offered a wide range of stakeholders the opportunity to participate in policy and program development. For example, the Department:
| |
| Output Group 2 – Program Management | |
|---|---|
| Indicator: | Evaluations and appeals of decisions in relation to:
|
| Reference Point/Target: | 100% of evaluations are made within legislated timeframes. 100% of appeals of decisions are considered within legislated timeframes. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The Therapeutic Goods Administration completed: 414 (100%) Category 1 and 1,174 (100%) Category 3 evaluations for prescription medicines within legislated timeframes (255 and 45 working days, respectively); no Category 2 evaluations; and 103 (100%) Design Examination Conformity Assessments for medical devices within the 255 day legislative timeframe. As a result of the business process improvements implemented to deal with the application backlog for medical devices in 2007–08, significant efficiencies have been gained and processing times for the inclusion of medical devices on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods are now within timeframes agreed between the Administration and industry. The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator evaluated 352 (100%) applications received in 2008–09 within the statutory timeframes. The Gene Technology Regulator accredited six organisations and certified 242 physical containment facilities. The Regulator also issued 14 licences for dealings not involving intentional release of genetically modified organisms into the environment, 13 licences for dealings involving intentional release of genetically modified organisms into the environment, and variations to 83 previously issued licences. | |
2006–07 | 2007–08 | 2008–09 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category 1 | 406 | 438 | 445 |
| Category 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Category 3 | 966 | 1,203 | 1,197 |
Source: Data extract from Strategic Integrated Management Environment System – Prescription Medicines Subsystem.
Category 1 refers to an application to register a new prescription medicine or change to a medicine not meeting the requirements for Category 2 or Category 3 applications.
Category 2 refers to an application to register a prescription medicine where two independent evaluation reports from acceptable countries are available.
Category 3 refers to an application involving changes to the quality data of medicines already registered and not involving clinical, non-clinical or bioequivalence data.
| Indicator: | Assessments and responses to appeals of decisions in relation to industrial chemicals are made within legislated timeframes. |
| Reference Point/Target: | 100% of appeals of decisions are considered within legislated timeframes. 96% of New Chemicals assessments considered within legislated timeframes and 100% adherence to legislated timeframes for Existing Chemicals. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| There were no appeals in 2008–09. Ninety-six per cent (217) of New Chemicals assessments were considered within legislated timeframes; and 100% (2) adhered to legislated timeframes for Existing Chemicals. | |
| Indicator: | Licensing and surveillance audits of Australian and overseas manufacturers are performed within target timeframes. |
| Reference Point/Target: | 100% of audits of Australian manufacturers and 90% of audits of overseas manufacturers are performed within target timeframes. |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |
| The Therapeutic Goods Administration performed 435 audits during 2008–09, with 374 (86%) performed within the target timeframe. This compares with 410 audits in 2007–08, of which 395 (96.3%) were performed within target timeframes. There were no overdue audits at the end of 2008–09. A risk assessment is undertaken for all overdue audits. | |
| Indicator: | Efficient post-marketing surveillance testing of therapeutic goods measured by the number tested. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Minimum of 800 products tested. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| In 2008–09, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, through its Office of Laboratories and Scientific Services, tested 1,024 products consisting of 2,300 samples. In addition, the Therapeutic Goods Administration completed protocol release evaluations for 745 batches of biological medicines. This compares with 818 products and 2,038 samples in 2007–08, and 817 products and 1,739 samples in 2006–07. | |
| Indicator: | Compliance with conditions in licences to undertake dealings with genetically modified organisms. Measured by the percentage of field trials inspected. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Minimum of 20% of field trials inspected. |
| Result: Indicator exceeded. | |
| The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator inspected a total of 59% (28) field trial sites planted to genetically modified crop plants. This compares with 51% of field trials inspected in 2007–08, and 37% in 2006–07. | |
| Indicator: | High level of compliance with the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Reports of alleged breaches are assessed within 10 working days and appropriate response initiated. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| In 2008–09, the Therapeutic Goods Administration received 1,068 alleged offence reports of breaches of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 from stakeholders, including members of the public, industry, local and international law enforcement agencies, and regulatory agencies. This compares with 1,107 reports in 2007–08 and 653 in 2006–07. During the year, the Therapeutic Goods Administration acknowledged receipt, in writing, of all identifiable complaints within ten working days. During this year, 818 of the alleged offence reports were investigated to completion, with 468 formal warnings issued to persons/companies. Ten persons/companies were charged and convicted of 98 criminal offences, and one company and its director were found to be in contravention of civil penalty provisions in the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 by the Federal Court. | |
| Indicator: | High level of compliance with the Gene Technology Act 2000. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Reports of alleged breaches are assessed within ten working days and appropriate response initiated. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| In 2008–09, there was one alleged non-compliance requiring formal investigation and it was concluded that there was no risk to the health and safety of people and the environment and no further action was required. | |
| Indicator: | High level of compliance with the Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Act 1989. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Potential breaches are investigated within 100 working days for 95% of cases. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme compliance team investigated all 30 potential breaches during the year within 100 days of receipt of complaint or identification of the breach (100%). This compares with 46 reports of breaches in 2007–08 and 63 in 2006–07. | |
| Indicator: | Effective communication and consultation with stakeholders measured by stakeholder survey. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Majority of stakeholders satisfied with the Therapeutic Goods Administration’s communication and consultation processes. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
Formal stakeholder consultation undertaken by the Therapeutic Goods Administration included:
| |
Source: Therapeutic Goods Administration online survey, June 2009.
| Indicator: | Timely and thorough consultation with stakeholders on regulatory change in relation to genetically modified organisms. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Seek input from stakeholders on proposed amendments to the Gene Technology Regulations 2001. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator conducted targeted consultation with regulated organisations, the states and territories and Australian Government agencies to inform its review of the Gene Technology Regulations 2001. Submissions received contributed to the development of proposed amendments to the regulations. | |
| Indicator: | Timely and appropriate consultation with all stakeholders in relation to industrial chemicals. |
| Reference Point/Target: | All relevant stakeholders (community, governments and industry) consulted. |
| Result: Indicator substantially met. | |
| The National Industrial and Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme’s Industry Government Consultative Committee, Community Engagement Forum and Technical Advisory groups on confidential listing of chemicals on the national inventory met throughout the year. Multi-stakeholder advisory groups were established for major activities such as the implementation of the review of the existing chemical assessment program, which met as required. The National Industrial and Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme also established an Industry Engagement Group to provide a forum for ongoing technical issues, particularly in relation to the notification and assessment requirements for chemicals not yet in the national inventory and available for use in Australia. The National Industrial and Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme’s States and Territories Memorandum of Understanding Group did not meet as its membership and terms of reference were under review. | |
| Indicator: | Influential role in international assessments, regulatory approaches, and methodologies for incorporation, as appropriate, into Australian industrial chemicals assessment and management systems. |
| Reference Point/Target: | Active participation in international harmonisation activities and progression of bilateral relationships. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
The National Industrial and Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme was an active participant in several groups of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s chemicals program. This involved:
| |
| Indicator: | Facilitate cooperation and harmonisation in the implementation of regulation of genetically modified organisms. |
| Reference Point/Target: | High degree of cooperation with relevant regulatory agencies. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator facilitated cooperation and harmonisation through activities such as:
| |
| Indicator: | National Industrial and Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme cost recovery activities undertaken in accordance with the Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Act 1989. |
| Reference Point/Target: | 100% adherence to legislated and departmental requirements. |
| Result: Indicator met. | |
| The National Industrial and Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme complied with all (100%) legislated and departmental requirements during 2008–09. | |
(A) Budget Estimate 2008–09 $’000 | (B) Actual 2008–09 $’000 | Variation (Column B minus Column A) $’000 | Budget Estimate 2009–10 $’000 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program 1.1: Chronic Disease - Early Detection and Prevention | ||||
| Administered Items | ||||
| 40,979 | 46,881 | 5,902 | 45,024 |
| Departmental Outputs | ||||
| 7,391 | 7,163 | (228) | 6,823 |
| 304 | 313 | 9 | 312 |
| Subtotal for Program 1.1 | 48,674 | 54,357 | 5,683 | 52,159 |
| Program 1.2: Communicable Disease Control | ||||
| Administered Items | ||||
| 21,589 | 20,856 | (733) | 22,328 |
| 2,366 | 2,364 | (2) | - |
| Departmental Outputs | ||||
| 3,990 | 3,866 | (124) | 3,683 |
| 164 | 169 | 5 | 168 |
| Subtotal for Program 1.2 | 28,109 | 27,255 | (854) | 26,179 |
| Program 1.3: Drug Strategy | ||||
| Administered Items | ||||
| 138,065 | 131,657 | (6,408) | 121,471 |
| 64,024 | 59,222 | (4,802) | - |
| Departmental Outputs | ||||
| 25,163 | 24,388 | (775) | 22,812 |
| 1,037 | 1,065 | 28 | 1,151 |
| Subtotal for Program 1.3 | 228,289 | 216,332 | (11,957) | 145,434 |
| Program 1.4: Food and Regulatory Policy | ||||
| Administered Items | ||||
| 584 | 50 | (534) | 579 |
| Departmental Outputs | ||||
| 11,190 | 11,101 | (89) | 10,037 |
| (11,123) | (11,035) | 88 | (9,972) |
| 3 | 3 | - | 3 |
| ||||
| 8,047 | 7,919 | (128) | 8,240 |
| 9,504 | 8,731 | (773) | 9,266 |
| 100,442 | 92,457 | (7,985) | 102,232 |
| Subtotal for Program 1.4 | 118,647 | 109,226 | (9,421) | 120,385 |
| Program 1.5: Immunisation | ||||
| Administered Items | ||||
| 33,493 | 31,538 | (1,955) | 25,105 |
| 8,200 | 8,179 | (21) | - |
| Special Appropriations | ||||
| 412,566 | 410,678 | (1,888) | 3,850 |
| Departmental Outputs | ||||
| 5,613 | 5,440 | (173) | 5,182 |
| 231 | 238 | 7 | 237 |
| Subtotal for Program 1.5 | 460,103 | 456,073 | (4,030) | 34,374 |
| Program 1.6: Public Health | ||||
| Administered Items | ||||
| 73,329 | 67,506 | (5,823) | 78,144 |
| 173,916 | 174,127 | 211 | - |
| Departmental Outputs | ||||
| 11,512 | 11,157 | (355) | 10,628 |
| 474 | 488 | 14 | 485 |
| Subtotal for Program 1.6 | 259,231 | 253,278 | (5,953) | 89,257 |
| Total Resources for Outcome 1 | 1,143,053 | 1,116,521 | (26,532) | 467,788 |
| Outcome 1 Resources by Departmental Output Group | ||||
| Department of Health and Ageing | ||||
| 21,259 | 22,279 | 1,020 | 21,301 |
| 152,683 | 141,183 | (11,500) | 150,405 |
| Total Departmental Resources | 173,943 | 163,462 | (10,481) | 171,706 |
| Average Staffing Level (Number) | 1,030 | 1,030 | - | 1,020 |
When accessing large documents (over 500 KB in size), it is recommended that the following procedure be used:
Attempting to open large documents within the browser window (by left-clicking)
may inhibit your ability to continue browsing while the document is
opening and/or lead to system problems.
To view PDF (Portable Document Format) documents, you will need to have a PDF reader installed on your computer. A number of PDF readers are available through the Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) Web Guide website.
Produced by the Portfolio Strategies Division, Australian
Government Department of Health and Ageing.
URL: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/annrpt/publishing.nsf/Content/annual-report-0809-toc~0809-2~0809-2-3~0809-2-3-1
If you would like to know more or give us your comments contact: annrep@health.gov.au